Issue No. 025
July 8, 2026
New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The IP Briefing · by ESCA Legal
|
|
|
|
| 7-Eleven filed a Northern District of Texas trademark complaint against Nike over a planned Air Max 95 release tied to orange, green, and red stripe branding. |
| § | The complaint was filed on July 1 and is listed as a Lanham Act trademark infringement action. | | § | 7-Eleven is the named plaintiff, with Nike as the named defendant. | | § | The public docket shows a complaint with jury demand, trademark notice materials, exhibits, and a summons request. | | § | The dispute puts a retail color system into a sneaker-design context, where collaboration signals, merch, and launch timing can shape consumer perception. |
|
| Continue reading → |
| § ESCA Takeaway |
| This issue tracks how familiar brand signals move across categories: convenience-store colors on sneakers, luxury names inside beauty licenses, and studio characters inside AI copyright discovery. |
|
|
| More IP Stories |
|
| § Trademark · Update |
|
|
| Coty agreed to return the Gucci Beauty license to Kering about a year early in a transaction valued at roughly $400 million. |
| § | Coty will continue operating Gucci Beauty through at least June 30, 2027, before the accelerated handoff. | | § | The transaction includes a $250 million upfront payment, $150 million due by September 30, 2027, and up to $30 million in performance-based incentives. | | § | The move sets up Gucci Beauty to transition into the broader Kering and L'Oreal luxury-beauty arrangement before the original 2028 expiration. | | § | The license has been one of Coty's major prestige assets since the company acquired Procter & Gamble's beauty brands in 2016. |
|
|
Why it matters
Luxury beauty is often built on licensing as much as product formulation. When a house name changes operators, the contract terms, transition incentives, inventory treatment, and brand-control mechanics become the real IP story.
|
| Continue reading → |
|
QUICK HITS
| § Copyright | Midjourney asked a California federal judge to review a discovery order limiting access to Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. materials about internal generative AI use. [source] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not subscribed? Sign up for future editions of Marked by ESCA Legal.
|
|
|
|
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Published by ESCA Legal. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Attorney advertising; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
|