Yesterday, I saw a video on the topic of AI witch hunts, and why it’s a problem. It was by a neurodivergent creator named Ches Is Hyperfixating (and shoutout to her for creating a thoughtful take on this situation!).
In the video, she talked about how writers are being accused of using AI no matter what they do. Regardless of whether they’ve ever touched an AI tool or not, they’re facing accusations from suspicious readers who claim they can easily spot AI text. It’s creating a great deal of stress and reputational damages for authors, to the point where one of them sued a reader for libel from a false accusation.
Ches brought up an important point: most people aren’t that good at detecting AI writing, and there’s very little nuance in the judgment. Often, people lump someone using AI for grammar help, brainstorming, or research into the same category as someone sharing a completely AI-generated work, but those are actually two very different things.
Today, I’d like to go deeper into this topic, because I’ve been thinking about it for a while. I’d like to share my thoughts on where we can improve in dealing with AI and the way we see it in creative work.