Things that caught my attention
Hello folks. Just a quick notice: I'll likely skip the next QoS because I'm getting some minor surgery done. Nothing life-threatening, but I'll have to slow down for a few days. Nothing to worry about 😃
Quantum #675 had an open rate of 48% and a click rate of 15%, and the most clicked link was this entertaining interactive experience of Claude Opus 4.5 over-engineering a simple request.
·In this issue, you'll find a few interesting goodies, including a brilliant write-up from Robin Linacre, a Civil Service data scientist and regular Quantum presence, of his experience of how data scientists can still work in the age of AI.
Slightly connected is the interesting take that suggests pandas should go extinct (no – not the animals), because of how its inefficiencies create terrible incentives for developers. I wonder if these incentives also work for LLM-written code.
A brilliant article on the Tedium newsletter reports the increase in agent-written e-mails, some of which are spam. On this note, I've started receiving some curiously written pitches for Quantum, recently, and I've been working out some are actually agentic – that doesn't mean that the topic they write about isn't worthy, but this is definitely making me think twice about what I should do with them. On this topic, also look at Dan Hon's most recent recent newsletter.
·One brief thought: I'm increasingly realising how QoS is becoming AI-dominated. At the beginning, I was trying to steer away from AI, making QoS specifically about data. But this specificity can no longer hold true in a world that uses AI for pretty much everything, and I'm no longer sure about where to set the bar.
Your views on this are, as usual, most welcome. Just hit reply!
·To close off this issue, let me remind you that, in this world of hype, bullish and bullshit are only one letter away.
'till next issue,
Giuseppe @puntofisso.bsky.social