Segment 1 — The Cold Open

In the spring of 1983, Chrysler began advertising its new Dodge Caravan as a “garageable” alternative to the station wagon, built on a truck chassis that qualified for the lighter federal fuel standard. Within a decade the same regulatory distinction had turned the minivan and its taller cousin, the SUV, into the dominant family vehicles on American roads. The law had been written to reduce oil consumption after the 1973 embargo; instead it helped shift the light-vehicle fleet toward larger, thirstier models whose sales share rose from under 20 percent in the early 1980s to more than half by the late 1990s.

Segment 2 — The Good Intention

The 1973–74 Arab oil embargo had cut U.S. supplies by roughly 5 percent and sent gasoline prices from 36 cents to 54 cents a gallon in a single year. In December 1975 President Gerald Ford signed the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, which created Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Lawmakers set an initial target of 27.5 miles per gallon for passenger cars by model year 1985 while leaving light trucks—defined at the time mainly as pickups and cargo vans—on a slower schedule that began around 17.5 mpg. The distinction reflected the view that commercial vehicles served different economic purposes and could not be redesigned as quickly. At the time, fewer than one in five light vehicles sold was a truck, so the loophole appeared modest and manageable.

Segment 3 — The Implementation

NHTSA published the first car standard of 18 mpg for 1978 and raised it in annual steps. Manufacturers responded by downsizing engines, improving transmissions, and shedding weight; average car fuel economy climbed from 13.5 mpg in 1975 to 28.5 mpg by 1988. Light-truck standards rose more slowly, reaching 20.7 mpg by 1996. Early compliance reports showed the car fleet meeting or exceeding targets, and both the Carter and Reagan administrations praised the program for cutting projected oil demand. A handful of analysts inside the Department of Transportation noted that the truck definition rested on vehicle attributes rather than actual use, but the observation did not alter the regulatory text.

Segment 4 — The Unintended Consequences

Automakers quickly realized that any vehicle classified as a light truck could be built to a lower fuel-economy target and still count toward the company’s overall average. In 1983 Chrysler certified the Caravan and Voyager as trucks; General Motors and Ford followed with the Chevrolet Astro and Ford Aerostar. By the late 1980s the same regulatory category was being used for four-door sport-utility vehicles whose passenger compartments were marketed directly to families. Because each additional truck sold relaxed the pressure on the car fleet, manufacturers invested engineering resources in truck platforms and advertising budgets in truck imagery. Between 1980 and 2000 the share of light trucks in total U.S. sales rose from 18 percent to 52 percent. The net effect on fleet-wide fuel economy was measurable: after rising steadily through the 1980s, average miles per gallon for all new light vehicles flattened and then declined slightly in the 1990s even as individual car models became more efficient. Second-order effects compounded the shift. Larger, heavier SUVs changed road design standards, increased the height of headlight beams, and altered the mix of vehicles in fatal crashes. By the time NHTSA began studying the safety consequences in the late 1990s, more than 40 percent of new vehicle registrations were light trucks.

Segment 5 — The Aftermath

Congress attempted to close the gap in the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act by directing NHTSA to set attribute-based standards that varied with vehicle footprint, reducing the incentive to enlarge a vehicle simply to qualify as a truck. The Obama administration later tightened the rules further, projecting a 54.5 mpg fleet average by 2025. Those targets were rolled back in 2020 and then reinstated in 2024, each change producing new compliance modeling rather than a single stable rule. Meanwhile the installed base of SUVs and crossovers continues to dominate sales, and the average curb weight of new vehicles has increased roughly 1,000 pounds since 1980. No subsequent policy has reversed the physical transformation of the U.S. fleet that the original car-truck distinction helped set in motion.

Segment 6 — The Lesson

Regulatory distinctions based on fixed categories invite reclassification rather than genuine redesign. When the cost of meeting a standard differs sharply across categories, market actors will migrate volume toward the lower-cost category even if that migration undercuts the original goal. The CAFE experience suggests that durable policy requires either uniform standards across substitutes or continuous adjustment mechanisms that anticipate redefinition. The same principle appears whenever rules attempt to separate “good” from “bad” versions of economically interchangeable products—electric-vehicle credits, building-energy codes, or emissions trading categories among them. How might today’s emerging rules for autonomous or electric vehicles embed similar category boundaries that future markets will simply walk around?

💬 Reply to this email — Patrick reads every one.

Share: X · LinkedIn · WhatsApp

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here — it's free.