Segment 1 — The Cold Open

Segment 2 — Why It Costs What It Costs Today

Aviation fuel today is produced at enormous scale in refineries that were built and optimized over decades for crude oil. The infrastructure already exists, the certification pathways are settled, and the capital has long been amortized, so the delivered price of fossil kerosene reflects little more than the cost of crude plus modest processing margins. Sustainable alternatives start without that legacy base. Most current SAF comes from hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids plants that were retrofitted from existing biodiesel or renewable diesel units. Those facilities remain small, typically handling only hundreds of thousands of gallons per day rather than the tens of millions common in petroleum refineries. Feedstock collection adds another layer: used cooking oil and animal fats must be gathered from thousands of dispersed restaurants and rendering plants, then cleaned, transported, and tested for contaminants before conversion. Hydrogen supply is usually drawn from natural-gas steam reforming rather than low-cost electrolysis, and the resulting renewable diesel or jet fraction must still pass the same stringent ASTM certification that fossil fuel meets automatically. Capital markets price the risk of these first-of-a-kind or second-of-a-kind plants at high hurdle rates, so financing costs compound through multi-year permitting and construction schedules. Airlines cannot simply pass a three-fold fuel price increase to passengers on long-haul routes where fuel already represents 20 to 30 percent of operating cost; the market therefore caps how much SAF they will offtake at premium prices. The result is a self-reinforcing loop in which limited demand keeps plants subscale, subscale plants keep unit costs high, and high unit costs keep demand limited.

The conventional path also locks in certain process choices that were sensible only when the goal was to prove technical feasibility rather than minimize cost at scale. Retrofitting a biodiesel hydrotreater means the reactor pressure, catalyst beds, and distillation cuts were already sized for road diesel rather than the narrower jet-range fraction, so extra separation steps and recycle loops become permanent fixtures. Each added valve, heat exchanger, and quality-assurance station carries its own capital charge and operating labor, yet none of those charges appear in the raw-material ledger. Because the plants are few and the offtake contracts are short, operators cannot spread the cost of spare parts inventories or specialized maintenance crews across enough volume to bring unit labor down. Regulatory reviews for each new feedstock source or catalyst formulation add calendar time that itself becomes capitalized interest, further widening the gap between what the chemistry could cost and what the first buyers actually pay.

Segment 3 — The Magic Wand Number & The Idiot Index

A rough magic-wand estimate begins with the major inputs. For a HEFA pathway the dominant feedstock is waste lipid material whose delivered price sits well below the cost of virgin vegetable oil; a rough commodity value for collected used cooking oil hovers around 30 to 50 cents per pound before processing. Converting that lipid to jet-range hydrocarbons consumes hydrogen whose cost depends on the source; merchant hydrogen from natural gas today runs on the order of one to two dollars per kilogram. The finished SAF molecule itself contains roughly 0.12 kilograms of hydrogen per kilogram of fuel, so the hydrogen component alone contributes perhaps 15 to 25 cents per gallon at current merchant prices. Adding the lipid feedstock share and minor process chemicals yields a combined raw-material floor somewhere in the range of 80 cents to one dollar and twenty cents per gallon before any energy or capital is applied. Delivered fossil jet fuel has recently traded between roughly two dollars and three dollars per gallon at major hubs. Dividing those two figures produces an Idiot Index between roughly two and four for the HEFA route when hydrogen is sourced cheaply. The index climbs sharply for power-to-liquid routes that rely on direct-air-capture carbon dioxide. Captured CO2 from today’s DAC pilots carries costs reported in the hundreds of dollars per ton; synthesizing a gallon of jet fuel requires on the order of 3.2 kilograms of carbon, so the CO2 alone can add several dollars before electrolysis hydrogen and synthesis steps are counted. In that pathway the raw-material floor sits several times higher and the Idiot Index stretches into double digits. The gap between either floor and today’s market price lives in several concrete stages. Small plant scale inflates capital recovery per gallon because the same reactor vessels, compressors, and distillation columns must be paid for with far fewer gallons. Fragmented feedstock logistics add trucking, storage, and quality-control steps that integrated oil refineries largely avoid. Certification and offtake contracts carry legal and delay costs that further raise the effective price. For DAC-based fuels the energy penalty of separating dilute atmospheric carbon dioxide dominates the thermodynamics long before any reactor chemistry begins.

Consider the arithmetic of scale more closely. A 200,000-gallon-per-day HEFA unit might carry capital charges of 40 to 60 cents per gallon simply to recover its installed cost over a ten-year life at a 12 percent return. Doubling capacity to 2 million gallons per day does not double the reactor volume or the number of distillation trays; many pieces of equipment scale with the two-thirds power of throughput, so the same capital recovery can fall below 15 cents per gallon. That single change moves the Idiot Index noticeably closer to the material floor without altering the chemistry. The same logic applies to hydrogen supply. When electrolysis is sized for a single small plant, the electrolyzer stack, power electronics, and water-treatment system sit idle whenever the SAF unit is down for catalyst regeneration. A purpose-built facility co-located with a multi-hundred-megawatt wind or solar array can run the electrolyzers at higher capacity factor, spreading their capital cost across more kilograms of hydrogen and thereby trimming another 10 to 20 cents from the finished gallon before any reactor chemistry occurs.

Segment 4 — The First-Principles Opportunity

A redesign would first target scale by building purpose-built HEFA or alcohol-to-jet facilities sized for millions of gallons per day rather than retrofitting existing biodiesel units. That move requires secure, multi-year feedstock contracts or vertical integration into collection networks so the plant can run at high utilization. Second, it would site co-located electrolysis powered by dedicated low-cost renewables so hydrogen cost falls toward the electricity-price floor rather than merchant-reformer prices. Third, it would standardize modular reactor and separation packages that can be replicated across multiple sites, cutting engineering and permitting time per installation. For power-to-liquid routes the priority sequence shifts: cheaper direct-air-capture contactors and lower-temperature regeneration cycles must be proven before the carbon cost drops enough to matter. Policy that prices long-term offtake or supplies low-cost capital for first-mover plants can compress the financing premium that currently inflates every gallon. The hard limits remain real. Waste-lipid volumes are finite and already competed for by road diesel and petrochemical uses; crop-based feedstocks collide with land-use constraints. Direct-air-capture routes carry unavoidable thermodynamic work to concentrate CO2 from 400 parts per million, and that work must ultimately be supplied by low-carbon electricity whose own cost curve still has distance to travel. Airlines will absorb only a modest premium before routes or fleets are adjusted, so any cost reduction must still land inside a narrow band above fossil kerosene.

One concrete objection is that larger plants simply concentrate feedstock risk. If a single facility draws from a regional network of renderers and restaurants, a disease outbreak or sudden export surge in animal fats can starve the reactor. The counter-move is therefore not merely bigger tanks but diversified intake: parallel lines that can accept both waste lipids and, when economics allow, sugars or alcohols from fermentation. That flexibility adds some piping and valve cost, yet the added capital is small compared with the revenue stability gained from keeping the plant online year-round.

Segment 5 — The Lesson

One principle is that the largest cost pools often hide in the interfaces between steps—collection logistics, certification queues, and financing spreads—rather than inside any single reactor. Another is that a fuel’s magic-wand floor is set by the cheapest abundant source of its constituent atoms and the energy required to rearrange them, not by the price tag on the first plants that happen to be built. Tomorrow and every day after, the show will examine either a concrete case where this kind of reasoning already cut cost or an industry still waiting for it. The first visible signal that someone is attempting the latter on sustainable jet fuel would be a multi-million-gallon, purpose-built facility backed by long-term feedstock and offtake contracts at a disclosed price well below today’s SAF averages.

💬 Reply to this email — Patrick reads every one.

Share: X · LinkedIn · WhatsApp

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here — it's free.