Year 2, Week 9
Feb 21-27, 2026 - ready, steady
Hello friends,
I know it’s a rough opening, but we stand on the precipice of more war. I’m talking specifically about Iran, where the UK has withdrawn its embassy staff in anticipation of an attack by the US. In preparation for retaliatory attacks, American embassy employees were advised to leave Israel today.1 And right now, the administration and our military leadership are engaged in extremely public histrionics over any limitation on its use of AI for mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weaponry.
When I launched this project, I wrote a note to myself, saying that I wanted it to be,
“a way to keep a handle on what’s happening without drowning in the churn…. to validate grief and rage without getting entirely swamped in it… a steady voice in the storm.”
So this was Year 2, Week 9. Steady as we go, yeah?
What happened in science & higher ed
Ellie Aghayeva, the Columbia student that ICE lied their way into campus housing to detain yesterday morning, has been released. Campus security cameras recorded the agents pretending to search for a missing child. What’s unusual about this case is not the lie, sadly, but how quickly the university president, mayor, other officials spoke out and took action to intervene - and how quickly Aghayeva was set free.2 New York governor Kathy Hochul has proposed a bill she says would keep ICE out of dorms and schools. But law enforcement agents are already required to secure a judicial warrant or judicial subpoena to enter Columbia university housing, classrooms, and other areas that are not public access. Do you know what your institution’s policies and protocols are about ICE?
Last week, NIH director Jay Bhattacharya also became acting head of the CDC, in a move that is tantamount to public health malpractice. STAT has an excellent analysis of why filling the CDC director role is so fraught.3 He replaces Jim O’Neill, who will be nominated to direct the NSF, despite the fact that he does not have a PhD, MD, or engineering degree. This week, the Senate HELP4 Committee held its confirmation hearing for Surgeon General nominee Casey Means.5 The Surgeon General is the country’s primary spokesperson and advisor on health issues. Their work can be socially transformative, like the 1964 warning on cigarettes, or the 1986 report on AIDS. Our next Surgeon General is walking into multiple public health disasters,6 including raging outbreaks of measles, which is a likely harbinger of other vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks.7 Means refuses to actually endorse measles vaccination and does not hold an active medical license. She is, however, a MAHA influencer who earns hundreds of thousands of dollars promoting longevity supplements.
On Wednesday, after a month of malfunction-related delays on the launchpad, NASA sent the Artemis rocket back to the hangar for repairs. On Thursday, the agency’s safety advisory panel released its annual report, which highlighted repeated warnings about elevated risk for upcoming Artemis missions due to overly ambitious timelines and multiple contingencies related to unproven SpaceX and BlueOrigin equipment. Since then, we’ve already seen abrupt changes to the mission plans, but creating even more aggressive schedules.8 While we’re talking about NASA, I have not been able to find any new updates on the latest funding pause that OMB placed on scientific missions earlier this month.9 We are now well past the ten-day window for the temporary hold.
And what’s next
I recently came across a fantastic thread from Molly Crockett that introduced me to the term epistemic vigilance. It describes the way we protect ourselves against being misled, and it has two necessary subcomponents: scrutiny of the content itself and scrutiny of the person offering you the content. She writes, “When I get info from another person I can ask: how does the content relate to their expertise? Their lived experience? Their interests and biases?”
Her thread is specifically about how we think about LLMs, and why we must fundamentally treat the products of agents like Claude differently - no matter how carefully we scrutinize the content they produce. She’s also published on how LLMs create an illusion of understanding that is particularly insidious in research contexts. That paper closes with the reminder that knowledge production “is a fundamentally social practice that is shaped by the norms of its institutions.”
Right now, those norms are changing radically - and not for the better. I had already been planning to write about how NSF is retooling its priorities to be all about AI and quantum computing. I think it is entirely reasonable to hypothesize that the disruptions in the GRFP10 are linked to new budget priorities that subsume everything else.
It’s the same pattern over and over again - unqualified people in positions of power are diverting all the resources into executive priorities that simply do not align with the best interests of the vast majority. It would be tedious11 if it wasn’t so dangerous.
I will leave you with some questions tonight, rather than my usual exhortations: What do we do once the pattern is clear? What are the perks of realizing that the chaos is all-too-predictable? And how might asking those questions help process the next onslaught of news?
Liz
As ever, thanks for reading & thinking with me. Meeting the Moment will always be free, but if you want to contribute, you can ⤵️
If this email was forwarded to you, hi! 👋 Every Friday night, I write a briefing on the week’s news that feel most important to those of us who care about science and higher education. If you like what you see ⤵️
you can get this delivered weekly
There’s also the fact that Pakistan’s defense minister declared open war on Afghanistan earlier this week. I won’t dignify the garbage about “taking over” Cuba with more than this footnote. ↩
If you were just wondering about it like I was, we’re just two weeks shy of one year since Mahmoud Khalil was arrested at his Columbia university apartment. ↩
I will always read a Helen Branswell byline and recommend you do too. She’s @HelenBranswell on Bluesky. ↩
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions ↩
Here’s the full video and transcript on CSPAN. I first wrote about Means in Week 16 (May 2025). Her confirmation hearing was initially scheduled for September but was postponed until now by the birth of her son. ↩
Don’t miss the latest cover of the Lancet - seeing it felt historic to me. But I’m not forgetting how long it took them to retract the Wakefield study, and that they published it in the first place. ↩
Because measles is so incredibly infectious, we see it first. That indicates falling vaccine coverage, which means vulnerability to other diseases, like whooping cough (pertussis), meningitis, polio, and more. ↩
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman is framing this as a return to Apollo-era speed. Connecting a few dots here is helpful: Isaacman has led two private missions with SpaceX. His close relationship with Elon Musk was the subject of contention in his confirmation hearing in December. The White House withdrew their initial nomination of Isaacman upon “thorough review” of Isaacman’s “prior associations” before renominating him. Putting aside Musk’s direct culpability for the waste and devastation created by DOGE, exactly why we are trusting any kind of scheduling to the man who merits an entire article tracking all his empty promises about technology… is a question that’s beyond me. ↩
NB: this is after Congress rejected the proposed White House budget cuts targeting these same missions. ↩
Graduate Research Fellowship Program - see my explanation from earlier this month ↩
“To this day, the far right’s ability to win converts is due to its radical emphasis on aesthetics at the expense of all convictions. Its aim above all is to excite, to not be boring. The irony is that this strategy reliably yields work of unusual tedium” - if you’re in the mood for a longer read, try this essay on Thomas Mann and the Temptations of Fascism. ↩
