Issue No. 008
May 29, 2026
New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The IP Briefing · by ESCA Legal
|
|
|
|
| Taylor Swift's legal team argued in Los Angeles federal court that The Life of a Showgirl is an expressive album title protected by the First Amendment and should not be blocked through a preliminary injunction. Las Vegas performer Maren Wade is seeking to limit Swift's use of the title on album-related merchandise while her trademark case proceeds. |
| § | Wade claims Swift's album title and related merchandise create reverse confusion with Wade's Confessions of a Showgirl brand. | | § | Swift's team argues the album title is an expressive work and that the requested merchandise ban would sweep too broadly. | | § | The court heard argument on the injunction request after Swift and related defendants also moved to dismiss the complaint. | | § | The dispute links music branding, tour and album merchandise, and the boundary between trademark claims and expressive titles. |
|
| Continue reading → |
| § ESCA Takeaway |
| This issue follows brand owners and creators testing how far trademark and copyright control can reach when names, merch, toys, and AI tools collide with public-facing culture. |
|
|
| More IP Stories |
|
| § Trademark · Filed |
|
|
| Pattie Gonia publicly challenged Patagonia's federal trademark lawsuit after the outdoor company sued over use of the Pattie Gonia name and a trademark application tied to apparel and environmental advocacy. Patagonia says it tried to resolve the dispute while protecting a brand it has built for decades. |
| § | Patagonia sued in Los Angeles federal court after the Pattie Gonia brand sought trademark registration connected to clothing and advocacy work. | | § | Pattie Gonia asked Patagonia to drop the case and framed the dispute as a threat to activist work and public identity. | | § | Patagonia says the issue is not the activist persona itself, but commercial use that could affect Patagonia's trademark rights. | | § | The case sits at the intersection of parody-adjacent naming, apparel branding, activism, and trademark enforcement. |
|
|
Why it matters
Trademark fights get harder when the challenged name is also a public persona with a social mission. For consumer brands, the legal question is not only whether enforcement is available, but whether enforcement will be understood as brand protection or brand overreach.
|
| Continue reading → |
|
| § Trademark · Pending |
|
|
| A New Jersey federal judge allowed Kidrobot's trademark lawsuit against Jazwares to continue over Squishmallows HugMees plush toys. Kidrobot claims HugMees infringes rights tied to its HUGME toys, which include licensed characters such as SpongeBob and Lilo and Stitch. |
| § | The court found the case too fact-heavy to dismiss at this stage. | | § | Jazwares argued HUGME is generic, but the court said other words can describe soft or huggable plush toys. | | § | Kidrobot says it began using HUGME before Jazwares' Kelly Toys business began selling HugMees. | | § | The dispute follows other plush toy fights around Squishmallows and lookalike products. |
|
|
Why it matters
Toy branding often turns on simple, emotionally obvious words, which can be hard to own but valuable when a product line takes off. The ruling keeps pressure on plush makers to separate product descriptors from enforceable brand signals.
|
| Continue reading → |
|
QUICK HITS
| § AI Copyright | Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. kept their California copyright case against MiniMax alive after a federal judge rejected the AI company's early dismissal arguments over the Hailuo image and video generator. [source] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not subscribed? Sign up for future editions of Marked by ESCA Legal.
|
|
|
|
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Published by ESCA Legal. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Attorney advertising; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
|