ESCA Legal Newsletter

Archives
Log in
Subscribe
June 5, 2026

Marked by ESCA Legal - June 5, 2026

Fresh IP developments on Louis Vuitton, 2 Live Crew, and Travis Scott.

Marked. - Issue 011

Fresh IP developments on Louis Vuitton, 2 Live Crew, and Travis Scott. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
Issue No. 011
June 5, 2026
New York
ESCA Legal
 
 
Marked.
The IP Briefing · by ESCA Legal
 

TOP STORY: Louis Vuitton Sues Maryland Live! Casino Over Luxury Bag Promotion

Louis Vuitton sued Maryland Live! Casino in Maryland federal court over a casino rewards promotion that allegedly used modified versions of Louis Vuitton's Monogram design on handbags, backpacks, toiletry bags, and other promotional items.
§The complaint targets an April 2026 promotion called The Art of Luxury, which offered casino rewards members bags and accessories using a pattern Louis Vuitton says copied its flower marks and famous Monogram design.
§The casino allegedly replaced the LV lettering with LIVE while using surrounding design elements that Louis Vuitton says falsely linked the promotion to the luxury house.
§Louis Vuitton says it sent a cease and desist letter in April, but the casino later ran a second promotion called Endless Elegance that offered chances to win purportedly genuine Louis Vuitton merchandise.
§The lawsuit seeks an injunction, destruction of the challenged products, corrective advertising, profits, damages, fees, and up to $2 million per counterfeit mark per type of goods.
Continue reading →
§ ESCA Takeaway
This issue tracks how famous brands and artists protect value when logos, catalog rights, and music credits move from marketing campaigns into court records.
 
More IP Stories
 
§ Copyright · Update

2 Live Crew Loses Catalog Termination Win on Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit reversed a 2024 jury verdict that had allowed 2 Live Crew members and heirs to reclaim rights to five albums from Lil Joe Records under copyright termination rules.
§The panel held that Mark Ross's termination interest remained part of his bankruptcy estate because it had not been scheduled, administered, or abandoned after his 2000 Chapter 7 case.
§Without Ross's valid participation, the 2020 termination notice had support from only two of four group interests, one short of the majority required under federal copyright law.
§The court did not decide whether the recordings were works made for hire, the issue the jury had resolved for the group in 2024.
§The opinion leaves open possible next steps tied to Ross's bankruptcy estate, but the current ruling keeps the catalog with Lil Joe Records.
Why it matters
Termination rights are a major artist leverage point, but this ruling shows how old bankruptcy filings can complicate who has authority to pull those rights back. For music catalogs, chain of title can turn on details far outside the recording contract.
Continue reading →
 
§ Copyright · Update

Travis Scott, SZA, and Future Copyright Suit Over Telekinesis Is Dropped

Victory Boyd voluntarily dismissed her copyright lawsuit against Travis Scott, SZA, Future, and related music companies over the song Telekinesis, ending the case with prejudice.
§The joint stipulation dismisses the claims with prejudice, with each side bearing its own costs and waiving appeal rights.
§Boyd had alleged that Telekinesis copied from her unreleased 2019 demo Like the Way It Sounds, which she said was created after Kanye West provided chords and melodies.
§A federal judge had allowed core copyright claims to proceed in March 2026 while trimming other parts of the case.
§Boyd remains credited as a co-writer in the track's streaming metadata, while the dismissal ends her pursuit of additional court relief.
Why it matters
High profile music cases do not always end with a merits ruling or a settlement headline. Voluntary dismissal can still close a major copyright cloud around a hit song while leaving authorship and credit questions largely outside a final court opinion.
Continue reading →
QUICK HITS
§ CopyrightSuno asked a Massachusetts federal court to keep the exact size of its AI music training dataset sealed in UMG and Sony's copyright case, while acknowledging that the labels' filings publicly refer to millions of recordings. [source]
§ CopyrightUdio made a parallel request in Sony Music's copyright case, seeking to redact the total volume of audio files plaintiffs allege were used to train its generative music model. [source]
§ CopyrightSuno announced a $400 million Series D at a $5.4 billion valuation while UMG, Sony, and other rights holders continue pressing copyright claims over AI music training. [source]
§ TrademarkTaylor Swift moved to dismiss Maren Wade's Showgirl trademark suit in California, arguing the complaint does not plausibly show consumer confusion between a Vegas performer brand and a music album title. [source]
 
Share on LinkedIn in
Share on X X
 
 
Not subscribed? Sign up for future editions of Marked by ESCA Legal.
ESCA Legal
55 Broadway 3FL #430
New York, NY 10006
www.esca.legal
Unsubscribe · Archive
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Published by ESCA Legal. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Attorney advertising; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Don't miss what's next. Subscribe to ESCA Legal Newsletter:
← Newer Marked by ESCA Legal - June 8, 2026 Older → Marked by ESCA Legal - June 3, 2026
Powered by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.