ESCA Legal Newsletter

Archives
Log in
Subscribe
July 31, 2026

Marked by ESCA Legal - July 31, 2026

Live! Casino brings its promotional supplier into a Louis Vuitton trademark fight, while Impossible Foods faces a new trial on punitive damages.

Marked. - Issue 035

Live! Casino brings its promotional supplier into a Louis Vuitton trademark fight, while Impossible Foods faces a new trial on punitive damages. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
Issue No. 035
July 31, 2026
New York
ESCA Legal
 
 
Marked.
The IP Briefing · by ESCA Legal
 

TOP STORY: Live! Casino Brings Its Louis Vuitton Bag Supplier Into Trademark Fight

Live! Casino Maryland and its parent company filed a third-party complaint against promotional vendor Power Promotions, seeking to shift liability arising from Louis Vuitton's trademark lawsuit over luxury-themed giveaway bags.
§The casino operators say they paid $167,162 for Lux Monogram bags that were distributed during an April customer promotion.
§Louis Vuitton alleges that the bags copied elements of its Monogram design, including flower motifs, while replacing the LV initials with the word Live!
§The casino alleges that Power Promotions was responsible for vetting the merchandise for intellectual property compliance.
§The third-party complaint seeks indemnification, contribution, damages for alleged contract and warranty breaches, and reimbursement of litigation costs.
Continue reading →
§ ESCA Takeaway
Brand disputes often extend beyond the initial infringement claim. This issue follows a promotional merchandise case moving into vendor indemnity and a trademark verdict entering a new damages phase.
 
More IP Stories
 
§ Trademark · Update

Impossible Foods Faces New Trial on Trademark Damages

A California federal judge ordered a new trial on punitive damages in the trademark dispute between Impossible Foods and lifestyle brand Impossible X.
§A March jury awarded Impossible X and founder Joel Runyon $1.5 million in compensatory damages and $1.75 million in punitive damages.
§The jury found that Impossible Foods infringed marks used by the lifestyle business.
§The post-trial order requires the punitive damages question to be tried again.
§The dispute concerns competing uses of the IMPOSSIBLE name across consumer products and lifestyle branding.
Why it matters
Trademark liability and the amount of damages can follow different procedural paths. A jury verdict may establish infringement while post-trial review changes how punitive damages are evaluated and ultimately awarded.
Continue reading →
 
Share on LinkedIn in
Share on X X
 
 
Not subscribed? Sign up for future editions of Marked by ESCA Legal.
ESCA Legal
55 Broadway 3FL #430
New York, NY 10006
www.esca.legal
Unsubscribe · Archive
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Published by ESCA Legal. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Attorney advertising; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Don't miss what's next. Subscribe to ESCA Legal Newsletter:
← Newer Marked by ESCA Legal - August 3, 2026 Older → Marked by ESCA Legal - July 29, 2026
Powered by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.