OK, I am FASCINATED that they changed the headline from "...that aren't worth your time" to "...the least popular thriller & mystery picks." Even by that slightly-more-objective standard, the article in nonsense because...the first three picks they mention have Goodreads averages of 3.83, 3.79, and 3.96?! Those are fantastic averages (and far higher than, say, the 3.1 average for the FANTASTIC RBC pick The House in the Pines, which they did not include). It! Makes! No! Sense!
OK, I am FASCINATED that they changed the headline from "...that aren't worth your time" to "...the least popular thriller & mystery picks." Even by that slightly-more-objective standard, the article in nonsense because...the first three picks they mention have Goodreads averages of 3.83, 3.79, and 3.96?! Those are fantastic averages (and far higher than, say, the 3.1 average for the FANTASTIC RBC pick The House in the Pines, which they did not include). It! Makes! No! Sense!