July 15, 2026

AI is coming for our brains, our jobs, and our creative output, but the real fight isn't about technology — it's about who owns the data, the platforms, and the very definition of intelligence itself.

The Deep End

Brown Professor Exposes AI Cheating: Midterm Averages Halved on In-Person Final

A Brown economics professor suspected widespread AI cheating on a take-home midterm. He changed the final to an in-person exam. Average scores plummeted from 96% to 48%, revealing a stark difference. This case exposes academic integrity challenges and institutional responses to AI-enabled dishonesty, highlighting the need for updated policies in higher education.

Brown University professor Roberto Serrano suspected AI cheating. His take-home midterm scores were unusually high. The average was 96%, compared to a historical 65-80%. He noticed writing styles similar to ChatGPT's output. Many student answers were "convoluted" and "off."

Serrano swiftly changed the final exam to in-person. Over a dozen students then dropped the course. The in-person final exam average dropped to 48.6%. Only a few students matched their midterm performance. This demonstrated a clear link between take-home format and AI use.

Key Takeaways:

• AI tools significantly inflate take-home exam scores, as proven by a Brown professor.
• In-person testing reveals true student comprehension, dropping averages from 96% to 48%.
• Revise assessment strategies to counter AI cheating by prioritizing in-person formats.

Read the full article

The Periphery

AI: Amplifying Human Potential, Not Replacing It Entirely

AI's impact on work remains widely misunderstood. This analysis dissects why AI functions as an amplifying technology, not a replacement. It explains why job replacement fears are largely misplaced. Learn how to adapt your skills for future collaboration with AI systems. This challenges common industry narratives with concrete evidence and historical parallels.

AI sparks both excitement and anxiety in the tech community. Many fear AI will eliminate jobs, but this view often misunderstands AI's true capabilities. Leading researchers argue AI amplifies human potential, rather than replacing it. History shows powerful technologies like electricity reorganized work, they did not eliminate it.

Key Takeaways:

• AI functions as an amplifying technology for human potential, not a direct job replacement.
• Reliability, not just capability, limits AI's real-world deployment in many critical tasks.
• Prioritize skills that complement AI capabilities; focus on decision-making, judgment, and creativity.

Screen Time Erodes Gen Z Cognition: A Policy Crisis, Not Personal Failure

Neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath warns unrestricted school tech use harms cognitive abilities. This generation scores lower on standardized tests. Data shows increased screen time correlates with worse academic performance. This analysis reveals the policy failures behind declining literacy and numeracy, and offers solutions for effective digital tool integration. Over $30 billion was spent on school laptops in 2024.

School laptops were supposed to boost learning. Instead, they eroded cognitive abilities. Neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath reports Gen Z shows lower standardized test scores. Maine's early laptop program failed to improve student outcomes. Unrestricted screen access atrophies learning skills.

Key Takeaways:

• Unrestricted technology in schools correlates with declining cognitive capabilities.
• Gen Z is the first generation to score lower on standardized tests.
• Implement strict screen time policies to foster deeper, sustained learning.

Newsrooms Battle Over AI Ethics, Jobs, and Publisher Control

AI's impact on newsrooms creates internal conflict. Publishers fight AI companies for copyright control. Unions negotiate new AI policies to protect jobs. This analysis shows why news organizations must define their AI future now. It highlights key debates shaping journalism's use of AI tools.

Internal conflicts over AI now expose deep fault lines within newsrooms. Publishers fight tech giants over intellectual property theft. Labor unions demand new policies to protect journalists' livelihoods.

Key Takeaways:

• Publishers pursue lawsuits against AI companies for content licensing and copyright infringement.
• Unions actively embed AI-specific clauses into labor contracts to protect editorial jobs.
• Implement clear internal AI policies through newsroom-wide discussions, not mandates.

AI Consent Platform: Giving Creators Control Over Their Work

RSL Media launches a new platform for creators. It provides clear, machine-readable consent for AI usage. This system outlines specific permissions: allowed, allowed with terms, or prohibited. Major artists like George Clooney and Meryl Streep endorse the initiative. This offers a new standard for creative rights in the AI era.

AI systems currently ingest creative content indiscriminately. Artists therefore face unauthorized use of their work. RSL Media introduces a consent-based solution. It enables creators to define how AI models interact with their intellectual property. This system gives creators explicit control.

Key Takeaways:

• RSL Media offers machine-readable consent for AI usage of creative works.
• Creators specify permissions as allowed, conditional, or prohibited for AI use.
• Implement clear consent mechanisms to protect creative content from unauthorized AI.

The Firehose

AI Development & Impact

• AI Summaries Don't Replace Reading; They Reveal Its Core Function
• AI: The Making Technology, Not Just a Time Saver
• Data Bottlenecks Threaten AGI Acceleration: Are AI Timelines Too Optimistic?
• Intelligence and Economy Merge: A New System Emerges From Firm Decomposition
• AI Writing Startup Marker Secures $13M to Redefine Creative Process
• AI Loop Engineering: Beyond Prompting, Towards Autonomous Agent Choreography
• AI Coding Tools Widen Skill Gaps for Developers
• Internet Father Vint Cerf Retires: AI Agents Demand New Protocols

Publisher Strategy & Audience

• New Publishing Models: Ecosystems, Newsletters, and Post-Traffic Strategies
• Audience Ownership: Why Publishers Must Ditch Platforms and Build Direct
• Publishers Build Direct Audience Relationships: Reduce Platform Dependency Now
• Fortune's Email Gamble: Direct Reader Relationships Outperform Algorithms
• News Readers Pay for Local Coverage, Not Just Ad-Supported Clicks

Media Content & Distribution

• NYT Prioritizes Video Content to Capture Evolving News Consumption
• Local News Captures World Cup Audiences, Boosts Community Trust
• YouTube Success: Master Subscribers, Suggested, Search, and Shorts
• Print Magazine Powers YouTube News Brand to Record Revenue

Worth Exploring

• Car Ownership: The Hidden Financial Drain and Social Cost
• Dropbox Becomes AI Skill Server, Expanding Access Beyond Developers
• Automated Deployments Slash Time from Code to Live Site

The Unintended Consequence

Emotions Are Reactive: Drive Action From Body, Not Feelings

Emotions signal current states; they do not initiate action. Procrastination often frames emotional readiness as a prerequisite for physical tasks. This perspective traps individuals in inaction cycles. We analyze how physical movement and social connection are real drivers for behavior change. Learn to harness your body and community for tangible progress, rather than waiting for feelings to align.

Attempting to change emotions to drive action is like pleading with a cart. Complex feelings respond to situations; they do not create forward momentum. People often expect to feel "inspired" or "calm" before starting tasks. This leads to chronic procrastination, trapping individuals in inaction loops.

Instead, focus on physical action and community connection. Your body and social interactions are the true "horses" that pull the cart forward. Change your physical environment or connect with others. This shifts your emotional state after action, not before it. Use emotions as feedback, not as a starting gun.

Key Takeaways:

• Emotions are reactive signals, not initiators of physical action or change.
• Procrastination often stems from awaiting emotional readiness before doing a task.
• Initiate change by moving your body or engaging with your community.

Read the Full Story