Today’s MT research digest highlights work on document-level translation, evaluation, and multimodal translation, alongside a few adjacent studies on reasoning and interpretability. Common threads include improving consistency over longer contexts, strengthening evaluation with better reference signals, and exploring structured or generative approaches that make translation models and related systems easier to understand.

Doc2FRC: Length-Consistent Document-Level Machine Translation via Fixed-Range Chunking

Advanced large language models (LLMs) with long context windows can substantially reduce input truncation in document-level machine translation (DocMT). However, direct Doc2Doc translation remains prone to n-gram repetition and progressive quality degradation. A common remedy is to segment the document into finer-grained chunks. Nonetheless, conventional rule-based chunking approaches fail to handle the length distribution mismatch between training and inference. To address this, we introduce Fixed-Range Chunking (FRC), utilizing dynamic programming to partition documents into chunks within a predefined length interval. By consistently applying FRC during training and inference, the input documents of any length are mapped to the same length distribution, substantially reducing train-test length mismatch. Centered on FRC, we propose a lightweight dual-boundary matching algorithm for chunk alignment, alongside four distinct training strategies. Experimental results show that FRC-based fine-tuning substantially improves 7B LLMs over direct Doc2Doc fine-tuning and outperforms existing DocMT methods on IWSLT2017. We further construct GlobVDoc, a 10-language test set independent of mainstream DocMT training sources, and show that FRC improves out-of-distribution document translation.

Investigating Temporal Motion Features for Pose-to-Text Indian Sign Language Translation

We investigate the effect of pretrained T5 model scale and explicit motion features on pose-to-text Indian Sign Language Translation (SLT) for the WSLP 2026 Shared Task. Pose sequences are projected into the embedding space of T5 through a lightweight pose encoder, with the complete model fine-tuned to generate English text. The shared task data used for this work consists of a test set with 5,334 examples and a validation set with 5,257 examples. We compare T5-small, T5-base, and T5-large, and additionally introduce a motion-augmented variant, T5-small + Motion, that adds explicit frame-to-frame pose differences to the input representation. T5-small achieves the best BLEU and ROUGE scores among the spatial-only models, while T5-large obtains the highest chrF score. Augmenting T5-small with motion features yields the largest single improvement observed in our study, substantially improving BLEU over the spatial-only baseline and making it the strongest model overall on this metric. Our submitted system ranked 5th on the official WSLP 2026 SLT testing leaderboard. The source code and trained models are publicly available on GitHub and HuggingFace.

In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for MT Evaluation

The WMT26 General MT task evaluates systems on 10 language pairs that have no human references (neither translated from scratch nor post-edited from MT output by humans). We describe how we built the pseudo-references for these pairs and six other language pairs (in which some forms of human references are available): seven models translate the 3,277 official documents under up to five prompt conditions, giving a total of 26 system-prompt combinations; then three reference-free quality estimation (QE) models score every candidate; and a per-document selector picks one translation, which GPT-5.5 post-edits where needed. Working without references exposed a failure mode of QE-guided selection: the metrics rank fluent output in the wrong language above correct translations. Adding a confidence-scaled language identification penalty to the score fusion drives the wrong-language count to zero, and the resulting selector still scores better on MetricX than the rank-fusion baseline it replaces. Since no references were available for these pairs while we were building them, we calibrate every selection decision on last year's WMT25 human judgments. The human evaluation, released after construction, shows the cost of getting selection wrong: our references stand with the strongest participating systems when the selector kept a frontier-model candidate, and fall up to 17 ESA points below them when it did not. We release the selection method and the provenance of every reference (https://github.com/surrey-nlp/PseudoRef)

RFCLLM: Evaluating LLMs' Reasoning Ability of Network Protocol State Machines

Mapping textual specifications into formal representations is essential for ensuring the correctness of protocol designs and implementations. LLM-generated mappings, used for networking security or testing, are assumed to capture a perfect understanding of the specification, which may not hold in practice. The goal of this paper is to assess the extent to which LLMs can interpret the specification correctly. We examine the degree to which an LLM's implicit representation of a finite-state transition system-defined via natural language descriptions-aligns with a manually generated ground-truth model. We designed 4 tasks and 1482 task queries for 16 protocols. We evaluated different judge biases, observed the inherent difficulty gaps between tasks, looked into the effect of 4 context types, and the influence of protocol characteristics. Our work contributes to a step toward verifying whether LLMs can really be trusted in FSM (Finite State Machine) reasoning of protocol specifications.

Generative Interpretability via Scalable Neuro-Symbolic Models

As the use of Large Language Models moves from chatbots into agentic systems, where outputs become actions with irreversible consequences on reality, the existing paradigm on AI Interpretability research, post-hoc interpretability, is structurally inadequate for safe and trustworthy model deployment: it explains behavior after the fact but cannot audit or intervene in an inference computation before it commits to an output. We therefore argue for a shift toward \emph{generative interpretability}, an architectural property under which a model's inference pass natively exposes semantically meaningful checkpoints that are human-understandable and amenable to causal intervention. We show the merits of generative interpretability as comparison to other interpretability research paradigms, and propose Neuro-Symbolic Models as a concrete instantiation.