Today’s MT research highlights a growing focus on how we evaluate translation systems, especially when speech, multilingual instruction following, and non-Latin scripts make the task harder to measure fairly. Across these papers, a common theme is that standard benchmarks can miss important real-world behavior, pushing researchers toward more robust evaluation setups, better alignment methods, and analysis tools that reveal where models succeed or fail.

Why We Need Speech to Evaluate Speech Translation

Speech translation models are increasingly capable of preserving speech-specific information (e.g., speaker gender, prosody, and emphasis), yet evaluation metrics remain blind to such phenomena. We meta-evaluate both text- and speech-based quality estimation metrics on two contrastive datasets targeting gender agreement and prosody, and find that both fall short, even when given direct access to the speech signal. We then train SpeechCOMET, a family of quality estimation models with speech encoders, and evaluate a state-of-the-art SpeechLLM as a judge. Both match or exceed text-based COMET on standard quality estimation, but neither consistently assesses speech-specific phenomena. We identify three causes: (1) speech-specific features are not reliably preserved in current encoders, (2) models tend to ignore the speech source signal, and (3) quality estimation training data contains too few relevant examples. We release all models and code, and argue that progress requires dedicated speech-specific training data and models that genuinely condition on speech.

IFMTBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multilingual Translation Instruction Following

Modern translation workflows demand more than semantic equivalence. Users routinely require models to preserve JSON or HTML schemas, honor curated glossaries, disambiguate with provided context, and match prescribed registers, often several at once. Conventional metrics such as BLEU and xCOMET capture semantic fidelity but provide little signal on constraint adherence, while general instruction following benchmarks ignore the cross-lingual nature of translation. We introduce \bench, a benchmark for multilingual translation instruction following covering seven languages, with 4,506 single-constraint and 2,838 multi-constraint items spanning six constraint dimensions and five compositional patterns with instructions issued in all seven languages. Constraints are split into a gating subset verified by deterministic checkers and a continuous subset scored by a rubric-based LLM judge, combined under a multiplicative rule that resists reward hacking. Evaluating 15 models reveals systematic gaps that prior protocols miss: Instruction following scales with size more sharply than translation quality, glossary and structured-format constraints dominate the difficulty gradient, and general instruction following rankings correlate only weakly with translation behavior. Our benchmark are available at https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/Hy-MT2/tree/main/IFMTBench.

Text-Preserving Lossy Text Compression: A Study of Strategic Deletion and LLM Reconstruction

Traditional lossless text compression preserves every byte, but its gains on natural language are often modest in realistic operating regimes. We study \emph{lossy semantic text compression}, where the encoder strategically deletes parts of the text and a large language model (LLM) reconstructs the original content from the retained skeleton. We benchmark a progression of deletion strategies, including uniform step deletion, word-length-guided deletion (WordLen), word-frequency-guided deletion (WordFreq), LP-optimized deletion (Opt), entropy-based deletion using GPT-2 surprisal, and hybrid methods that combine frequency and surprisal signals. Evaluation on the BBC News dataset across retention rates $\r_{keep} \in [0.1,0.9]$ shows three main findings. First, WordFreq is a strong low-cost baseline: despite using only a static frequency lookup, it remains competitive with much more expensive semantic methods while being far faster at the encoder. Second, semantic and hybrid methods provide their clearest gains at mild-to-moderate compression, whereas word-frequency deletion is often more robust at the lowest retention rates. Third, QLoRA fine-tuning yields a strong local decoder that is competitive with Gemini 2.0 Flash and is often strongest in decoder-only comparisons. Additional English and Chinese experiments show that the overall framework transfers across domains, while the best deletion rule remains dataset-dependent.

Breaking the Script Barrier: Enabling Automatic Alignment for PoS-based ASR Error Analysis in Non-Latin Scripts

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems are commonly evaluated using aggregate metrics such as Word Error Rate (WER), which do not capture the linguistic structure of errors. Fine-grained analysis, such as Part-of-Speech (PoS)-wise error characterization, requires accurate alignment between ASR hypotheses and reference transcriptions. However, existing alignment tools are often unreliable for languages written in non-Latin scripts. In this work, we address this gap by proposing a robust, automated, language-agnostic alignment mechanism applicable across ASR architectures and across languages written in both Latin and non-Latin scripts. This enables consistent alignment of hypotheses, references, and evaluation sequences, forming the basis for downstream linguistic analysis. Building on this, we employ standard PoS taggers to perform scalable and reproducible PoS-wise error analysis. Notably, we perform alignment and downstream ASR error analysis across three major segmented writing systems, namely, Abugida (Tamil, Hindi, Kannada), Alphabetic (English, Russian, Greek), and Abjad (Arabic). We further demonstrate how such error information can be leveraged during ASR training to improve metrics such as WER.

Challenges in Explaining Pretrained Clinical Text Classifiers

Explaining the predictions of neural models in clinical NLP remains a significant challenge, especially for complex tasks involving long, unstructured medical texts. While post-hoc methods like LIME and SHAP are widely used, they often fall short when applied to clinical narratives. In this paper, we identify core limitations of token-level and perturbation-based explanation techniques through targeted demonstra- tions on a hospital length-of-stay prediction task. Our findings reveal issues such as overemphasis on non-informative tokens, instability in at- tributions, and high-confidence predictions for incoherent input variants. These results underscore the need for explanation strategies that are clin- ically meaningful, semantically grounded, and robust to linguistic noise.