Today’s MT digest highlights a recurring focus on what it really means to evaluate and improve translation systems without relying on idealized assumptions. Across the papers, a common thread is the push toward stronger alignment between evaluation and real-world deployment, whether through source-free assessment, structural constraints, or more reliable automatic validation pipelines.

Another theme is extending MT-adjacent techniques to richer, more structured inputs and harder reasoning settings, from document-level alignment and key-value extraction to multimodal and multi-hop evaluation workflows. Together, these works point to a broader shift toward robustness, scalability, and task-aware metrics that better reflect practical language technology use.

Source-Free MT Evaluation Is Not MT Evaluation

Reference-based metrics remain the standard choice in machine translation evaluation, partly because quality estimation methods often correlate less well with human judgments. As a result, source-free, reference-based evaluation has become the practical norm, even though it is unfaithful to the definition of translation adequacy and unfair to systems whose outputs preserve the source meaning while differing from the reference. This paper argues that adequacy must be judged with respect to the source. A reference is only one possible rendering of the source and may introduce bias, under-specification, or errors. We further argue that source-reference-hypothesis evaluation is fair only when the judge treats the reference as auxiliary evidence rather than as the primary standard. Otherwise, even source-aware evaluation can reduce adequacy to preference towards reference. We show the existing hybrid metrics are highly reliant on reference compared to source. Our argument is not that all automatic MT metrics fail to use the source. Rather, we argue that any evaluation protocol that removes the source, or allows the reference to dominate the source, is structurally incomplete for adequacy evaluation. However, existing MT papers generally prefer reference-based metrics and use QE metrics only when reference is unavailable. We therefore call for QE to be reframed as a primary approach to source-grounded adequacy evaluation, rather than as a fallback motivated by missing references. We further call for hybrid metrics whose designs explicitly prioritize source--hypothesis faithfulness while using references only as complementary evidence.

Identify, Locate, Link: End-to-End Key-Value Extraction from Document Images

Document processing pipelines traditionally cascade optical character recognition (OCR) engines with downstream models for structured information extraction, leading to multi-stage error propagation. We fine-tune SmolDocling, a compact 256M-parameter vision-language model (VLM), to perform end-to-end key-value extraction directly from document images, jointly solving identification, localization, and association in a single pass without OCR preprocessing. We extend DocTags with specialized key, value, region, and link tags, enabling many-to-many relationships in a unified output sequence. To address data limitations, we design an augmentation pipeline combining synthetic form filling and graph-based crops that preserve complete key-value subgraphs. We further introduce a layout-aware evaluation framework extending text matching with spatial bounding box verification. On FUNSD, XFUND, and a large-scale private dataset, our model outperforms larger zero-shot VLM baselines under layout-aware evaluation, while being 27 times smaller than Qwen2.5-VL (7B) and over 5 times faster at inference. The model weights will be released publicly after publication.

COMET: Contrastive Motion-Enhanced Temporal Reasoning for Video Multimodal Large Language Models

Video multimodal large language models have advanced significantly, yet fine-grained motion-temporal understanding remains fragile. The core bottleneck is not only sparse frame sampling, but also the lack of a complete temporal modeling pipeline for explicitly representing frame-to-frame change, enabling appearance-motion interaction, and optimizing temporal direction sensitivity. We propose COMET, a temporally grounded framework that systematically strengthens video MLLMs through explicit temporal representation, appearance-motion fusion, and direction-aware optimization. Architecturally, COMET introduces a temporal motion branch built on Taylor frame differences and injects its motion evidence into the appearance stream via temporal attention bias-enhanced cross-attention. For optimization, COMET combines temporal prior distillation with a forward-reverse TC-GRPO stage that turns temporal order into a direct learning signal and strengthens the model's use of directional motion patterns encoded by the temporal motion branch. The method achieves consistent overall improvements with a pronounced motion-temporal bias: on Qwen3-VL-8B, action-centric tasks (STAR, SSv2) improve by 4.9% on average, temporal reasoning tasks (NExT-QA, CLEVRER, LLaVA-178K) by 2.1% over BL-GRPO, while static perception tasks (PerceptionTest) remain on par. The same gain pattern also transfers to InternVL2.5-8B, indicating that COMET generalizes across model families.

Automating Multi-Hop RAG Evaluation via TRIAD: From Context Extraction to Validated Dataset Generation

Recent advances in LLMs and the adoption of RAG systems in industry have created a need for domain-specific question-answer datasets that can assess RAG performance on proprietary data. Existing datasets, such as HotpotQA, challenge current RAG systems on Wikipedia-based knowledge, but they cannot be transferred directly to domain-specific settings. A comprehensive evaluation of RAG system quality requires both multi-hop queries and unanswerable questions. This paper introduces TRIAD, a three-stage automated dataset generation approach. First, it generates question--answer (QA) pairs for the domain-specific knowledge base of a RAG system. Second, a validator checks each QA-pair in a feedback loop. Third, the QA pairs are extended with relevance-labeled context documents for downstream evaluation. We evaluate this approach against the established MuSiQue and HotpotQA datasets. The results show that the generated dataset exhibits similar performance trends across different RAG setups, while human validation indicates that the questions are suitable for evaluating a domain-specific RAG system. The code used to generate the dataset and all validation results are available in our GitHub repository(https://github.com/lorenzbrehme/triad).

Scaling Unsupervised Word Alignment to Documents via Structural Constraints

Word alignment has traditionally been studied between sentences, but many cross-lingual tasks increasingly require correspondences across full documents. While recent multilingual embedding models can encode long inputs, we show that applying algorithms designed for sentences directly to documents leads to performance degradation. To address this, we introduce CTFAlign, a lightweight, training-free approach for document-level word alignment. CTFAlign applies a coarse-to-fine refinement strategy that restricts the alignment search space to semantically similar regions. Additionally, we introduce MDPAlign, a simpler alternative that constrains alignments by position with a main diagonal prior. Both approaches operate directly on full documents without relying on sentence segmentation or sentence alignment. We evaluate these methods across six language pairs varying in typological distance, resourcedness, and document length. Averaged over three models, CTFAlign reduces word alignment error rate from 0.412 to 0.326. These gains transfer downstream, leading to improvements in document-level translation coverage evaluation and recognition of semantic differences. We release CTFAlign as a Python package and make the code and data to reproduce our experiments publicly available.