Today’s MT digest highlights a field pushing beyond surface-level fluency toward models that better align meaning, knowledge, and uncertainty across languages. A recurring theme is richer multilingual representation: from cross-lingual pre-training and dataset design to the challenge of capturing idiomatic, non-literal meaning across both languages and modalities. Another is reliability under pressure, with several works probing how calibration breaks, hallucinations emerge, and retrieval-augmented systems can self-correct to produce more faithful outputs.

Bridging Linguistic Gaps: Cross-Lingual Mapping in Pre-Training and Dataset for Enhanced Multilingual LLM Performance

Multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with cross-lingual tasks due to data imbalances between high-resource and low-resource languages, as well as monolingual bias in pre-training. Existing methods, such as bilingual fine-tuning and contrastive alignment, can improve cross-lingual performance, but they often require extensive parallel data or suffer from instability. To address these challenges, we introduce a Cross-Lingual Mapping Task during the pre-training phase, which enhances cross-lingual alignment without compromising monolingual fluency. Our approach bi-directionally maps languages within the LLM embedding space, improving both language generation and comprehension. We further propose a Language Alignment Coefficient to robustly quantify cross-lingual consistency, even in limited-data scenarios. Experimental results on machine translation (MT), cross-lingual natural language understanding (CLNLU), and cross-lingual question answering (CLQA) show that our model achieves gains of up to 11.9 BLEU points in MT, 6.72 points in CLQA BERTScore-Precision, and more than 5% in CLNLU accuracy over strong multilingual baselines. These findings highlight the potential of incorporating cross-lingual objectives into pre-training to improve multilingual LLMs.

Calibration Collapse Under Sycophancy Fine-Tuning: How Reward Hacking Breaks Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs

Modern large language models (LLMs) are increasingly fine-tuned via reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) or related reward optimisation schemes. While such procedures improve perceived helpfulness, we investigate whether sycophantic reward signals degrade calibration -- a property essential for reliable uncertainty quantification. We fine-tune Qwen3-8B under three regimes: no fine-tuning (base), neutral supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on TriviaQA, and sycophancy-inducing Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) that rewards agreement with planted wrong answers. Evaluating on $1{,}000$ MMLU items across five subject domains with bootstrap confidence intervals and permutation testing, we find that \textbf{sycophantic GRPO produces consistent directional calibration degradation} -- ECE rises by $+0.006$ relative to the base model and MCE increases by $+0.010$ relative to neutral SFT -- though the effect does not reach statistical significance ($p = 0.41$) at this training budget. Post-hoc matrix scaling applied to all three models reduces ECE by $40$--$64\%$ and improves accuracy by $1.5$--$3.0$ percentage points. However, the sycophantic model retains the highest post-scaling ECE relative to the neutral SFT control ($0.042$ vs. $0.037$), suggesting that reward-induced miscalibration leaves a structured residual even after affine correction. These findings establish a methodology for evaluating the calibration impact of reward hacking and motivate calibration-aware training objectives.

When Meaning Isn't Literal: Exploring Idiomatic Meaning Across Languages and Modalities

Idiomatic reasoning, deeply intertwined with metaphor and culture, remains a blind spot for contemporary language models, whose progress skews toward surface-level lexical and semantic cues. For instance, the Bengali idiom \textit{\foreignlanguage{bengali}{\char"0986\char"0999\char"09CD\char"0997\char"09C1 \char"09B0 \char"09AB\char"09B2 \char"099F\char"0995}} (angur fol tok, grapes are sour''): it encodes denial-driven rationalization, yet naive models latch onto the literal fox-and-grape imagery. Addressing this oversight, we presentMediom,'' a multilingual, multimodal idiom corpus of 3,533 Hindi, Bengali, and Thai idioms, each paired with gold-standard explanations, cross-lingual translations, and carefully aligned text--image representations. We benchmark both large language models (textual reasoning) and vision-language models (figurative disambiguation) on Mediom, exposing systematic failures in metaphor comprehension. To mitigate these gaps, we propose ``HIDE,'' a Hinting-based Idiom Explanation framework that leverages error-feedback retrieval and targeted diagnostic cues for iterative reasoning refinement. Collectively, Mediom and HIDE establish a rigorous test bed and methodology for culturally grounded, multimodal idiom understanding embedded with reasoning hints in next-generation AI systems.

Lost in Diffusion: Uncovering Hallucination Patterns and Failure Modes in Diffusion Large Language Models

While Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm comparable to autoregressive (AR) models, their faithfulness, specifically regarding hallucination, remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we present the first controlled comparative study to evaluate hallucination patterns in dLLMs. Our results demonstrate that current dLLMs exhibit a higher propensity for hallucination than AR counterparts controlled for architecture, scale, and pre-training weights. Furthermore, an analysis of inference-time compute reveals divergent dynamics: while quasi-autoregressive generation suffers from early saturation, non-sequential decoding unlocks potential for continuous refinement. Finally, we identify distinct failure modes unique to the diffusion process, including premature termination, incomplete denoising, and context intrusion. Our findings underscore that although dLLMs have narrowed the performance gap on general tasks, their distinct hallucination mechanisms pose a critical challenge to model reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZeroLoss-Lab/Lost-in-Diffusion

Self-Correcting RAG: Enhancing Faithfulness via MMKP Context Selection and NLI-Guided MCTS

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) substantially extends the knowledge boundary of large language models. However, it still faces two major challenges when handling complex reasoning tasks: low context utilization and frequent hallucinations. To address these issues, we propose Self-Correcting RAG, a unified framework that reformulates retrieval and generation as constrained optimization and path planning. On the input side, we move beyond traditional greedy retrieval and, for the first time, formalize context selection as a multi-dimensional multiple-choice knapsack problem (MMKP), thereby maximizing information density and removing redundancy under a strict token budget. On the output side, we introduce a natural language inference (NLI)-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) mechanism, which leverages test-time compute to dynamically explore reasoning trajectories and validate the faithfulness of generated answers. Experiments on six multi-hop question answering and fact-checking datasets demonstrate that our method significantly improves reasoning accuracy on complex queries while effectively reducing hallucinations, outperforming strong existing baselines.Our code is available at https://github.com/xjiacs/Self-Correcting-RAG .