This state has lofty emissions goals for buildings — is a commission the right choice?
Welcome back to The Planet You Save May Be Your Own. I'm Taylor Kate Brown and this week we're looking at where one state is in their attempt to get fossil fuels out of buildings.
(photo by Ryan Somna on Flickr)
This week's edition is a republished story from Energy News Network about Massachusetts' Commission on Clean Heat. But what's "clean heat"? I've touched on some efforts by local and state governments to block gas hookups in new buildings.
But what goes in its place? What about older buildings? The most common answer is electric heat pumps (which despite their name, can also work as cooling). While Massachusetts has some lofty goal about retrofitting older buildings, as you'll see below, it hasn't moved quickly so far.
Are you interested in knowing what your state is doing about emissions from buildings? Reply to this email.
A reminder: If you’re a regular reader of The Planet You Save and want to support the work I’m doing, consider signing up for a paid subscription. Paid subscribers support the newsletter and ensure it’s a regular part of my work week. As a paid subscriber you’ll also get an additional Resource of the Month email where I share one good resource I’ve found on local climate action and some ideas about how to use it. This month's bonus email is arriving early next week, so sign up before Monday to get it!
As always, sharing this newsletter with friends, family, even acquaintances is highly encouraged — it's the primary way this newsletter grows. They can sign up to get it each week here.
Lack of transparency feeds skepticism of Massachusetts’ clean heat commission
by Sarah Shemkus, Energy News Network
Massachusetts climate advocates are hopeful but not yet convinced that a first-in-the-nation state Commission on Clean Heat will result in adequate policies for transitioning buildings from fossil fuels. Gov. Charlie Baker signed an executive order establishing the commission in September.
In the months that followed, the administration shared little about the process of assembling the panel, declining even to identify its members until the group was sworn in and met for the first time on Jan. 12.
Following the commission’s first closed-door meeting, many advocates are left wary of the group’s makeup, transparency, and timeline.
“I remain hopeful that the commission will use its opportunity to address the climate crisis and push the commonwealth away from more reliance on fossil fuels in equitable ways,” said Amy Boyd, director of policy at the nonprofit Acadia Center. “But I think it may take a lot of work to get there.”
Building use of fossil fuels, for purposes such as heating and cooking, accounts for 27% of Massachusetts’ greenhouse gas emissions and poses a major challenge to the state’s attempts to slash emissions in half by 2030 and go carbon-neutral by 2050.
As part of this process, at the end of 2020, the Baker administration released a decarbonization roadmap outlining strategies for reaching this goal, including tighter building envelopes and widespread adoption of electric heat pumps. Among the goals detailed in the report is a target of retrofitting 100,000 homes with electric heat pumps each year, but a recent Boston Globe investigation found just 461 homes were converted in 2020.
The commission is tasked with helping translate the administration’s strategies into concrete policy ideas that will help accelerate this progress. The panel is expected to meet regularly for several months with the goal of submitting its recommendations to the administration by Nov. 30, shortly before Baker, who is not running for re-election, hands over the reins to a new, incoming governor.
Environmental advocates universally praised the goals of the commission and expressed sometimes precarious optimism that the group could have an important impact on emissions reductions.
“I am hopeful that they can get to work and that they can come up with some really path-breaking recommendations that lead to the decarbonization of that sector,” said Elizabeth Turnbull Henry, president of the Environmental League of Massachusetts.
Still, advocates are keeping a wary eye on the commission’s progress. When Baker announced the formation of the commission, he promised a group that would have a “diversity of experience.” The 21 members revealed in January are drawn from a range of industries and backgrounds, including utilities, building, finance, real estate, housing, urban planning, energy, and technology.
However, some environmental advocates are not sure the promised diversity is there. One member is an expert on green building, another has experience retrofitting houses for greater energy efficiency, and another has long worked on clean energy policy, but these environmentally leaning members are far outnumbered by other interests, advocates worry.
“I’m disappointed to see that the sectors most represented on the commission are business and fossil fuels, rather than consumers, environmental justice communities, or building electrification experts,” Boyd said.
Other advocates expressed concern that a commission could produce great recommendations that just don’t go anywhere. Henry pointed to the Commission on the Future of Transportation, established by Baker in 2018. The group’s December 2018 report included a range of policy suggestions, such as modernizing public transportation, considering congestion pricing, and upgrading the electric grid to support wider adoption of electric vehicles.
At the same time, however, it skirted the question of how to pay for the initiatives outlined and didn’t include any mechanisms for driving action or holding policymakers accountable, Henry said. So this time around, she is hoping the clean heat commission will make questions of funding and implementation central to their work.
“Massachusetts has a long history of grandiose commissions that yield little in terms of actual policy progress,” Henry said. “I am really going to be looking at the quality of the recommendations and the actionability.”
Larry Chretien, executive director of the Green Energy Consumers Alliance, is also concerned about the commission’s commitment to laying out effective policy specifics. Chretien would like to see the group engage deeply with the public, sharing ideas, listening to feedback, and releasing a draft of its recommendations before its November deadline, so it can hear back from stakeholders before making its official report to the administration.
This kind of robust engagement, he said, will help create a plan with strong enough public backing to survive a change of leadership when a new governor takes office in January 2023.
“If they come out with something in November, and the governor-elect doesn’t like it, and there hasn’t been enough public comment, it will have been a wasted year,” Chretien said. For some advocates, the commission’s timeline is dragging out an already lingering process at a time when the climate crisis is ever more urgent.
Ben Hellerstein, state director of Environment Massachusetts, wondered why the state is just now convening the commission, nearly three years after it began working on the climate roadmap in 2019.
Hellerstein would like to see more action right away, rather than another 10 months of meetings and debates.
“We have the technologies to reduce energy waste and heat our buildings with clean electricity, and there are plenty of policy ideas out there,” Hellerstein said. “Studies and commissions are nice, but if we have to choose I'd rather spend less time confirming what we already know, and more time on the action that's urgently needed.”
This article first appeared on Energy News Network and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
More local climate stories
-
Dark days for solar energy customers hoping for Con Ed discounts in New York
-
The Salt River Project faces backlash on proposed Arizona gas plant expansion: 'You're pushing it down their throat'
-
Oil and gas companies face $275K in fines for not reporting methane pollution in New Mexico
-
"As a rancher, I feed people while caring for the land. So why wasn’t I feeding myself?"
-
The census undercounted people of color. Here’s what that means for environmental justice in specific communities
-
Kansas impasse shows green energy opposition has lost steam.