What a person looks like influences our connection with them. We all know this from our interactions with people of different attractiveness. Clearly, what a person looks like does matter.
Why should it then be so surprising or considered a bad thing if people feel more comfortable around people who look phenotypically like themselves?
We already see this in how most people in multi-racial societies couple. People innately like people who look phenotypically like themselves. That is the human default.
This is why we can suspect that anyone who couples exclusively inter-racially likely has an undiagnosed/undiscovered form of mental illness (it's a big departure from what's normal to the average human).
Important: there are 2 different but related terms being used in this piece: 'inter-racial' and 'inter-phenotypic'. But because phenotype itself is determined by genotype (if certain features are not expressed phenotypically, they are still there, just recessive), they are in practice functionally the same thing.
But coupling inter-racially in the first place shouldn't be allowed to be a thing at all. Because of its several undesirable consequences. Primarily: creating 'hybrid' children via inter-racial coupling increases the number of human groups, and since our societies are complex systems, increasing the number of variation of one of the variables is unnecessarily increasing the complexity of the entire system.
One tangible way in which this complexity-increase shows up in the lives of the people involved is the loneliness these hybrid people feel their entire lives: they are never totally accepted by either group from which they come (unusual creatures no one's sure how to interact with).
In the past, the question of the identity of hybrid kids and who they coupled with didn't matter much because: i. There weren't that many of them in the first place for anything to need to change. ii. There weren't many options for what could happen. They simply lived normal lives. A little lonelier than most people maybe, but they interbred back into one of the sides from which they came.
Unfortunately, our world has changed in very big ways.
Our contemporary world is a world that allows maximal individual freedom to seek maximal satisfaction of any wants, interests or obsessions. It is a world in which people can choose to claim to be of the opposite sex or even a cat if they so desire. It is a world that allows people to make life-changing decisions not based on what is rigorously reasonable, but simply what they 'feel' like. It is a world that expands and maximizes an obsession with individual identity.
If this means, in a world of maximal individual freedom, that offspring from the same interracial couplings come together to become their own racial group, and too inter-racially couple, every coupling with a different racial group creates a new hybrid 'race'. The entire thing eventually devolves into an interracial inception.
The entire world would eventually become like sub-Saharan Africa where there are thousands of ethnic groups with different interests who can hardly agree on anything. And therefore chaos reins. Do we really want that for the entire world, but with a thousand different races?
"lol. that could could never happen. there would be lots of things they would have in common (most things even), and very little differences"
Yeahh. Ever been to Africa? Aren't they mostly the same Niger-Congo and Bantu people? Don't they in fact have most things in common? Can you phenotypically tell an Igbo person from a Yoruba person or from an Akan person? That's right. You can't. Can those different ethnic groups agree on anything nonetheless within even the same country?
The problem of interracial coupling is a new problem in our world: a result of technological advancement.
It used to be a lot harder for people of different racial groups to meet and mix. Easier means of telecommunication and transportation which has resulted in the existing globalist world is what has entirely changed what's possible.
But should we blindly allow anything technological possible to happen, or should we make human decisions about the influences that we allow new technology to have on us and the trajectory of our world?
Remember, the fundamental problem is of a complex-systems increase, and my theoretic run-through is only one several possibilities. There are tons of others that cannot be predicted. Choosing against unnecessarily increasing the complexity of the system seems like the obviously safer decision.
The only realistic solution is to prohibit miscegenation very early right now when we still have reasonable control of the situation. Otherwise, the interracialception looms.