stem.io logo

stem.io

Archives
Log in
Subscribe
August 1, 2026

stem.io: Why can the lizard do it and the strongest person alive cannot?

Read this on the web

On a movie screen, a man in a red suit presses his bare palms flat against a glass skyscraper and walks straight up, forty floors above the street. On the windowsill of that same building, a gecko does the real version, hanging off the smooth glass by its toes. One of those is a special effect. The other is just an animal on a window, and no amount of arm strength will let you copy it. Why can the lizard do it and the strongest person alive cannot?

A gecko's foot splayed flat against a window, its toe pads pressed on the smooth glass, seen from the far side of the pane.

A gecko's foot pressed on the far side of a window pane. Photo: Hian-Kun Tenn / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Why It Works

Start with the answer: the gecko isn't gripping anything. On smooth glass there's nothing to grip. It's sticking, and the glue is a force acting between its foot and the wall at the level of individual molecules.

Every molecule tugs faintly on every other molecule nearby. Bring two surfaces close enough and they feel a weak pull called the van der Waals force. It's the same faint attraction that makes two very flat, very clean panes of glass cling when you press them together. On its own it's tiny. At a single point of contact, it's nothing you would notice.

A gecko's whole trick is to have an absurd number of those points. The underside of each toe is carpeted in millions of microscopic hairs called setae, and each hair frays into hundreds of even finer tips. Spread out, they let a foot that looks flat and dry make molecular contact across a huge hidden area. Add up van der Waals over all of it and you get an animal that can hang its entire weight from a ceiling by its toes.

So the pull a gecko can make depends on contact area: more tips touching, more stick. And that is exactly what keeps you on the ground, because sticky area and body weight do not grow at the same rate. Double the size of anything and its surface area goes up fourfold, but its volume, and so its weight, goes up eightfold. This is the square-cube law: stick scales with area, weight scales with volume, and as size climbs, weight always pulls ahead.

Now blow a gecko up to human size. Its weight races out ahead of the sticky area you could ever pack onto fingertips and toes. The hairs can't keep up. To hold a grown person on van der Waals alone, the pads would have to be ridiculous. One 2016 study figured that a human wanting to walk up a wall gecko-style would need sticky feet around a European shoe size 145, a U.S. size 114. That's most of your legs turned into gecko pad.

Strength has nothing to do with it. You could have a rock climber's forearms and it wouldn't help, because on smooth glass there is nothing to squeeze. The lizard beats you not by being stronger but by being smaller, small enough that its sticky area still outweighs its own body. A gecko is about the biggest an animal can be and still climb glass this way. A person is far past that size, so the weight always wins. That is why Spider-Man's wall-crawling only works on screen.

Show Your Work

The full derivation, in proper notation, lives on the site: read it here.

Try It Yourself

You can make the square-cube law appear on a table in about a minute. Grab a pile of identical cubes: sugar cubes, dice, or square LEGO bricks all work.

  1. Set one cube down alone. It shows 6 faces. Call that one unit of "stick" (surface) and one unit of "weight" (the cube itself).
  2. Build a cube twice as wide: 2 by 2 by 2, so 8 cubes packed together. Count them: 8 units of weight.
  3. Count the faces on the outside of the big block. Six sides, each a 2 by 2 square, so 24 faces. That's 4 units of stick.

Weight went up 8 times. Surface went up only 4. Double the size again and the gap widens. That's the whole reason a scaled-up gecko peels off the wall.

Then watch the force itself: open PhET's Atomic Interactions and pull two atoms apart to see the van der Waals attraction rise and then fade with distance.

Three Links to Read (or Not)

  1. Why Spider-Man can't exist: geckos are the 'size limit' for sticking to walls: The clearest write-up of the scaling argument, and the source of the size-114 shoe. Read it for the punchline that a gecko is close to the biggest an animal can be and still do this.
  2. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae (PNAS, Autumn et al.): The primary paper that pinned the stickiness on van der Waals and ruled out water and surface chemistry. Dense, but skim the abstract to see how you'd even prove which force is doing the work.
  3. Geckos' sticky secret? They hang by toe hairs (Live Science): The half of the story I left out: a gecko has to unstick thousands of times a minute without wasting energy, and this covers how the toe angle switches the grip off. Worth it for the on/off trick alone.

Problem of the Week

Last week's answer: last week a 4.0 kg bowling ball rolled head-on into a 1.0 kg billiard ball at rest, perfectly elastic on a frictionless lane, and we wanted each ball's velocity afterward. The answer: v1p = 3.6 m/s, v2p = 9.6 m/s. Conserving both momentum and kinetic energy in a 1D elastic collision leaves the light ball leaving faster than the heavy ball arrived.

Problem

A sticky material grips a smooth ceiling with a flat adhesive strength of 2.0 newtons for every square centimeter of contact. We'll take that number as given and not ask where it comes from. You mold the stuff into solid cubes. Each cube hangs from the ceiling by its whole top face, pressed flat against it. The material has a density of 1200 kg/m³.

As you make the cubes bigger, the weight climbs faster than the sticky area. Find the largest cube edge length that still holds, right at the point where its weight equals the adhesion on its top face. Take g = 9.80665 m/s².

Nice Catch

Every number in this issue gets checked by an independent verifier that re-derives it from scratch, so the math should hold up: the square-cube counts, the shoe size we cited, the 1.7-meter cube. The words wrapped around those numbers are AI-drafted, though, so an analogy or a claim can still be wrong even when the arithmetic is clean. If something reads off, hit reply and tell me. Next week this space names what broke, the fix, and who caught it.

Same inbox for ideas: if there's something you've always wanted taken apart, reply and tell me what it is. That's where a lot of these issues come from.

Don't miss what's next. Subscribe to stem.io:
← Newer stem.io: How does a speck light up the whole sky? Older → stem.io: Can a ball really leave faster than the foot that kicked it?
Powered by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.