Issue 39: Smarter by Thursday
Smarter by Thursday
One practical AI win, every week. No jargon required.
Spring cleaning and giving feedback to a team member may seem like unrelated tasks. One belongs at home with a dust cloth; the other belongs at work in a conversation you may be quietly dreading. But both become easier when you use AI to turn a vague intention into a clear, workable plan - without handing over your judgment.
Try at least one before Sunday. That is the whole assignment.
Use Case 1 of 2
Use Case 1: Spring cleaning using a checklist AI creates
At 9:15 a.m. on Saturday, April 4, Margaret, 62, stood in her kitchen with a cup of coffee in one hand and a cleaning cupboard full of half-used products in the other. She had promised herself she would “finally do the spring cleaning,” but that phrase had become so large and shapeless that she did not know where to begin. Should she wash the windows? Empty the pantry? Clean behind the refrigerator? Change the smoke-alarm batteries? By lunchtime, she had wiped one counter, reorganized three drawers, and felt no closer to finished. Margaret did not need motivation. She needed a sensible list that matched her house, her available time, and her energy.
Here is the exact prompt to use:
Copy and paste this into ChatGPT or Claude:
I want you to create a practical spring-cleaning checklist for my home.
Here are the details: - Home: [for example, two-bedroom apartment / three-bedroom house] - Number of bathrooms: [number] - Floors: [carpet, hardwood, tile, vinyl, or a mixture] - People who live here: [number] - Pets: [yes/no and type] - My available time: [for example, two hours each Saturday for four weekends] - Physical limitations or tasks I should avoid: [describe them, or write “none”] - Areas that most need attention: [list them] - Areas I do not want to deep-clean this season: [list them] - Cleaning supplies I already have: [list them]
Create a checklist divided into four weekly sessions. For each session: 1. Put the tasks in a sensible order. 2. Estimate how long each task will take. 3. Mark each task as essential, useful, or optional. 4. Include ordinary household tasks such as dusting, floors, bathrooms, kitchen surfaces, high-touch surfaces, windows, filters, and checking batteries where appropriate. 5. Include a short list of supplies needed before each session. 6. Avoid recommending dangerous chemical combinations or tasks that require professional equipment. 7. Make the plan realistic for my available time. Do not assume I can clean the entire home in one day.
Use plain language. At the end, give me a “minimum version” containing only the five most worthwhile tasks if I become tired or run out of time.
The strength of this prompt is that it gives AI the information a generic checklist cannot know: the size of the home, the available time, physical limits, priorities, and supplies already on hand. It also asks for order, duration, and priority - not merely a long inventory of chores. Asking for an essential/useful/optional distinction prevents the familiar spring-cleaning trap of treating every task as equally urgent.
Use Case 2 of 2
Use Case 2: Giving feedback to a team member
At 4:40 p.m. on Tuesday, September 29, Daniel, 54, was still looking at a report from Priya, one of the strongest people on his team. The report had arrived two days late, and several figures in the final section did not match the source spreadsheet. Daniel was frustrated, but he also knew Priya had been covering for a colleague who was away. He did not want to send a sharp email in the heat of the moment, nor did he want to soften the issue so much that nothing changed. His real problem was not finding words. It was separating observable facts from assumptions, explaining the effect, and making a clear request without turning a work problem into a personal criticism.
Here is the exact prompt to use:
Copy and paste this into ChatGPT or Claude:
Help me prepare for a private, respectful feedback conversation with a team member.
The situation: - Team member’s name: [name] - Their role: [role] - What happened, with dates and specific observable facts: [describe exactly what you saw or received] - What was expected: [describe the agreed deadline, quality standard, or process] - The impact on the team, client, customer, or project: [describe the consequence] - What I appreciate about this person’s work: [give one or two genuine strengths] - What I want to improve: [state the behavior or result, not a judgment about their personality] - What I am asking them to do differently next time: [specific request] - Relevant context I may be missing: [workload, absence, unclear instructions, or write “unknown”]
Draft: 1. A brief opening that explains my intention and shows respect. 2. A neutral description of the situation and observable behavior. 3. A clear explanation of the impact. 4. A specific request for what should happen next time. 5. Two curious questions that invite their perspective. 6. A calm response if they become defensive. 7. A short closing that confirms the next step.
Use a direct but humane tone. Do not use labels such as “careless,” “unprofessional,” or “bad attitude.” Do not invent facts, motives, or excuses. Distinguish clearly between what I know, what I am assuming, and what I need to ask. Keep the suggested conversation under five minutes before the discussion becomes a two-way conversation.
This prompt works because it gives AI the raw material for useful feedback: the situation, the behavior, the impact, and the requested change. It explicitly bans personality labels, which keeps the conversation focused on something the person can actually improve. Asking for questions and a defensive-response option is also important; good feedback is not a speech you deliver, but the beginning of a conversation.