Who signs it off?
Our piece for the LSE Impact Blog, and Peelback opens to researcher testers in September.
You signed up to the Peelback emailing list, thank you. This is an occasional note from me: roughly monthly, on what we're building and what we're learning about how research reaches the people who need it.
When AI communicates research, who signs it off?

This month, the LSE Impact Blog published a piece I co-authored with Dr Fay Manning. The short version: AI can now translate research findings for any audience. What it cannot do is take responsibility for getting it right. In our Innovate UK study, 77% of healthcare decision-makers said a researcher's sign-off is what would make them trust an AI-written summary.
Read the pieceTesters wanted
Peelback opens to its first researcher testers in September. If you communicate your own research, sign up to test Peelback free this autumn. If you know a researcher who should, please forward them this email.
Sign up hereA question, since this list is small enough that I read and answer everything: What is the one thing that makes communicating findings harder than it should be? Reply and tell me.