One True Prompt — Issue 217
Here are 10 prompts you can use today. Each one is ready to copy and paste into ChatGPT or Claude. Try at least one.
Prompt: Turn a confusing health diagnosis into clear, trustworthy next steps
Copy and paste this:
You are a calm, evidence-based health explainer helping a 67-year-old named Robert understand his new diagnosis.
Robert’s situation:
- Age: 67
- Lives in: Columbus, Ohio
- Background: Retired electrician, still drives, walks his dog daily, does light gardening
- Recent doctor visit: His primary care doctor told him he has “mild osteoarthritis in both knees”
- Current concerns: Worried this means he’ll lose his mobility, unsure what to read online, overwhelmed by conflicting advice about supplements and “miracle cures”
Do the following:
1. Explain in plain, reassuring language what “mild osteoarthritis in both knees” usually means for someone like Robert who can still walk, drive, and garden.
- Use short sentences.
- Avoid medical jargon or, if you must use it, explain it in everyday words.
- Keep the explanation to 4 - 5 short paragraphs.
2. List 6 - 8 reliable *types* of information sources he should look for when researching his condition (for example, “major hospital websites,” “national arthritis organizations,” “government health agencies”), and 3 - 4 types he should treat with extra caution (for example, “miracle cure blogs,” “celebrity health channels”).
- Do not give specific website names; describe the categories.
- For each type, explain *why* it is more or less trustworthy in simple language.
3. Create a simple “3-step check” he can apply to any new article or video about osteoarthritis before believing or sharing it:
- Step 1: Source check
- Step 2: Evidence check
- Step 3: Emotion check
For each step, give 3 - 4 concrete questions he can ask himself in plain language (e.g., “Who is behind this information?” “Are they trying to sell me something?” “Do they mention side effects?”).
4. End with a short, 8 - 10 sentence “doctor conversation guide” Robert can take to his next appointment. It should:
- List 6 - 8 specific questions he can ask his doctor (about pain, movement, exercise, medications, and what to avoid).
- Be written as a script he could almost read out loud.
- Focus on safety, realistic expectations, and staying active as long as possible.
Write everything in straightforward language suitable for a thoughtful, non-technical 67-year-old man.
Use case: Robert, 67, just heard “mild osteoarthritis in both knees” and went home to Google it. He (or his daughter Laura) pastes this prompt into AI to get a clear explanation, a way to judge online information, and practical questions for his next doctor visit.
Expected result: A calm explanation of his diagnosis; a clear list of trustworthy vs. questionable sources; a simple 3-step “BS filter” for health content; and a ready-to-use list of questions/scripts for his next appointment.
Pro tip: Swap Robert’s details (age, city, condition) with your own situation to get a personalized explanation and question list for *your* health issue (for example, “Type 2 diabetes,” “sleep apnea,” or “early-stage breast cancer”).
Prompt: Build a 90-day learning plan to understand AI (without becoming a tech expert)
Copy and paste this:
You are a patient learning coach helping a 58-year-old named Denise create a 90-day plan to understand AI well enough to follow the news, ask good questions, and use it at work.
Denise’s situation:
- Age: 58
- Job: HR manager at a mid-sized manufacturing company in Milwaukee
- Tech comfort: Uses email, Excel, and PowerPoint; nervous about “AI replacing jobs”
- Time available: 30 - 40 minutes per day, 4 days per week
- Goal: Understand AI in plain language and learn 3 - 4 practical ways to use it in her HR work (writing job descriptions, summarizing surveys, drafting policies).
Do the following:
1. In 4 short paragraphs, explain at a “curious non-technical adult” level:
- What AI is (in everyday terms, no math).
- What “large language model” means.
- The main strengths and main limitations of tools like ChatGPT and Claude.
- Why people talk about both “opportunities” and “risks” with AI.
2. Design a 90-day learning plan for Denise with:
- 3 “identity statements” (e.g., “I’m the kind of person who asks AI to explain things in simple language”) tailored to her situation.
- 4 learning themes: “Basic concepts,” “Using AI for personal life,” “Using AI for HR work,” “Understanding risks and ethics.”
- For each theme, list 5 - 7 specific learning activities (like “Ask AI to explain bias in hiring and then summarize it in my own words,” “Use AI to draft a job description for a quality control supervisor”).
3. Create a week-by-week schedule:
- Weeks 1 - 4: Gentle introduction and basic concepts.
- Weeks 5 - 8: Practical everyday and HR uses.
- Weeks 9 - 12: Risks, ethics, and building her own “AI rules” at work.
For each week, list 4 specific 30 - 40 minute “sessions” labeled Session 1, Session 2, etc., with clear instructions for what Denise should *ask AI* or *do* in that session.
4. Design a simple tracking sheet Denise could keep on paper:
- Columns: Date, Session focus, What I did, What I learned, One question I still have.
- Brief instructions for how to use it once per session.
5. End with a short “confidence check-in” for Day 30, Day 60, and Day 90:
- For each date, list 5 - 7 questions she can ask herself to see her progress (for example, “Can I explain AI in plain language to a coworker?” “Have I tried AI on at least 3 HR tasks?”).
Write everything in clear, everyday language for a 58-year-old professional who is thoughtful but not technical.
Use case: Denise, 58, keeps hearing about AI in HR conferences and in the news. She pastes this prompt into AI to get a concrete 3-month learning plan she can follow in short sessions, without turning into a programmer.
Expected result: A plain-language explanation of AI; a structured 90-day plan; detailed weekly “sessions” she can follow; a simple tracking sheet layout; and self-check questions to see her progress.
Pro tip: Change Denise’s job and goals (for example, “55-year-old accountant who wants to use AI for tax research” or “62-year-old nurse manager who wants to understand AI in healthcare”) to get a tailored plan for your profession.
Prompt: Compare different sources on a medical treatment (without getting lost)
Copy and paste this:
You are an objective medical information organizer helping a 64-year-old named Sandra compare different sources about intermittent fasting for weight loss and blood sugar control.
Sandra’s situation:
- Age: 64
- Health background: Overweight, prediabetes, mild high blood pressure
- Lives in: Phoenix, Arizona
- She has read about intermittent fasting (especially “16:8 fasting”) but found conflicting information.
Do the following:
1. Imagine Sandra has read articles from three types of sources:
- A major hospital website.
- A well-known university health newsletter.
- A popular fitness blog run by a personal trainer.
Without naming specific institutions, create a comparison table with these columns:
- Source type
- Overall stance (cautious, enthusiastic, neutral)
- Claimed benefits
- Mentioned risks/downsides
- Who they say it is MOST appropriate for
- Who they say should be cautious or avoid it.
2. For each source type, list 4 - 6 example *claims* they might make about intermittent fasting (both benefits and risks).
- For each claim, mark it as:
- “Strong evidence”
- “Some early evidence”
- or “Mostly speculation / expert opinion”
Based on what a careful, evidence-based doctor would likely say today.
3. Create a clear, plain-language explanation for Sandra (3 - 4 paragraphs) about:
- Why different sources sound so different.
- Which types of claims she should treat as “interesting but not yet proven.”
- How to notice when someone might be exaggerating benefits or downplaying risks.
4. Write a short script (6 - 8 sentences) Sandra could use to talk with her doctor about intermittent fasting.
- Include 6 - 8 specific questions she can ask (about safety with prediabetes, medication timing, realistic expectations, and signs it might not be right for her).
- Make the tone respectful and focused on safety and informed decision-making.
Write everything in simple, calm language suitable for a 64-year-old woman who reads health articles but is not a scientist.
Use case: Sandra has been reading about intermittent fasting and doesn’t know who to trust. She pastes this prompt into AI to get a clear comparison of different source types, a sense of how strong the evidence is, and a script for talking with her doctor.
Expected result: A comparison table of major hospital, university, and fitness blog perspectives; labeled claims with rough evidence strength; a plain-language explanation of why information conflicts; and a ready-to-use doctor conversation script.
Pro tip: Swap “intermittent fasting” with another treatment you’re considering (for example, “knee replacement surgery,” “CBD for chronic pain,” “statins for high cholesterol”) to get a similar structured comparison and doctor script.
Prompt: Create three levels of explanation for a tricky economic idea (inflation)
Copy and paste this:
You are an economics explainer helping a 60-year-old named Martin understand inflation well enough to follow the news and talk with his adult children.
Martin’s situation:
- Age: 60
- Lives in: Atlanta, Georgia
- Background: Runs a small plumbing business, worries about rising prices and retirement savings.
- Real-life examples: Groceries, rent for his workshop, gas for his vans.
Do the following:
1. Explain inflation to Martin like he’s 12 years old, using everyday examples:
- Talk about groceries (for example, the price of a carton of eggs going from $2.50 to $3.50 over several years).
- Talk about rent (for example, his workshop rent increasing by $150 a month).
- Talk about gas (for example, filling up a work van costing more).
- Use short sentences and simple words.
- Keep it to 3 - 4 short paragraphs.
2. Explain inflation again at a “high school student” level:
- Add concepts like interest rates, central banks (without naming specific ones), and supply and demand.
- Give simple examples of “too much money chasing too few goods.”
- Keep it to 4 - 5 short paragraphs.
3. Explain inflation a third time at an “adult who reads the news” level:
- Include:
- What causes inflation in broad terms.
- Why central banks raise or lower interest rates.
- The idea of “wage-price spiral” in plain language.
- The difference between “temporary price spikes” and “persistent inflation.”
- Use everyday language, but don’t avoid complexity; just explain it clearly.
- 4 - 6 short paragraphs.
4. After these three explanations, ask Martin 6 - 8 short, simple questions to check his understanding.
- Make them multiple-choice or very short answer.
- Cover the key points from each level.
5. Create an answer key:
- Briefly explain the correct answer to each question in one sentence.
Write everything in direct, clear language suitable for a non-technical small business owner.
Use case: Martin sees “inflation” in headlines and hears conflicting opinions from friends and TV commentators. He pastes this prompt into AI to get three step-by-step explanations, building from very simple to more advanced, plus a small quiz to see if it clicked.
Expected result: Three increasingly detailed explanations of inflation; a short quiz tailored to his examples; and an answer key that reinforces the main ideas.
Pro tip: Replace “inflation” with other confusing economic topics (for example, “mortgage interest rates,” “index funds,” or “Social Security trust fund”) to get a similar three-level explanation and understanding check.
Prompt: Design a realistic reading plan to finally finish a serious nonfiction book
Copy and paste this:
You are a reading coach helping a 52-year-old named Karen create a plan to finish a serious nonfiction book she has been putting off.
Karen’s situation:
- Age: 52
- Job: High school history teacher in Denver
- Book: “Thinking, Fast and Slow” by Daniel Kahneman
- History: Has started the book twice, gets lost in the details, and stops around page 120.
- Time: 25 - 35 minutes per evening, Monday - Thursday.
Do the following:
1. Briefly (in 2 - 3 paragraphs) describe the main themes of “Thinking, Fast and Slow” in plain language suited for a thoughtful non-psychologist.
- Focus on the basic ideas of two kinds of thinking (“fast” and “slow”) and why they matter in everyday decisions.
2. Create a 6-week reading plan for Karen:
- Break the book into manageable chunks by section (you don’t need exact page numbers; use section names and rough sizes).
- For each week, list:
- What sections she will read.
- Approximate total reading time (based on 4 evenings of 25 - 35 minutes).
- One “focus question” to keep in mind while reading.
3. For each of the 4 evenings per week, suggest:
- A short warm-up ritual (for example, “Put phone in another room, make tea, set a 30-minute timer”).
- 1 - 2 questions she can ask herself after reading that night and write down in a notebook (for example, “Where did I see ‘fast thinking’ at school today?”).
4. Create a simple “summary habit” for the end of each week:
- 10 - 15 minutes to write a one-paragraph summary of the week’s reading.
- 3 bullet points: “One idea,” “One example from my life,” “One question I still have.”
5. At the end, design a “completion reflection” for when she finishes the book:
- 8 - 10 questions to help her connect the book’s ideas to:
- Her teaching.
- Her own decisions (money, health, relationships).
- How she talks to students about thinking and bias.
Write everything in calm, practical language for an experienced teacher in her 50s.
Use case: Karen bought a serious book, keeps meaning to read it, but never makes it through. She pastes this prompt into AI to get a realistic 6-week reading plan with nightly routines and reflection questions that make the ideas stick.
Expected result: A clear overview of the book’s main themes; a week-by-week reading schedule; simple nightly and weekly reflection habits; and deeper questions to connect the book to her teaching and life.
Pro tip: Swap the book details with the nonfiction book you’ve been avoiding (for example, “The Body Keeps the Score,” “Atomic Habits,” or a biography) to get a tailored reading and reflection plan for that specific book.
Prompt: Turn scattered online research about a big purchase into a clear comparison
Copy and paste this:
You are a practical decision helper for a 63-year-old named James who is researching what kind of vehicle to buy for retirement.
James’s situation:
- Age: 63
- Lives in: Raleigh, North Carolina
- Current car: 11-year-old sedan with 165,000 miles.
- Use: Local driving, occasional road trips to visit grandchildren 4 hours away.
- Concerns: Reliability, comfort for long drives, fuel costs, and not overcomplicating things with too much tech.
Do the following:
1. Create a comparison table for 4 specific vehicle “profiles” (do not list brand names; describe the types). Use columns:
- Type (for example, “well-known Japanese hybrid SUV from a brand known for reliability”).
- Estimated price range new.
- Strengths for someone like James.
- Potential downsides or trade-offs.
Vehicle profiles to include:
- A compact hybrid SUV known for reliability.
- A mid-size gasoline sedan focused on comfort.
- A plug-in hybrid SUV suitable for mixed city/highway driving.
- A small fully electric car mainly for local driving.
2. For each profile, list:
- 6 - 8 concrete questions James should research or ask at the dealership (about range, reliability, maintenance costs, charging, comfort, and long-trip practicality).
- 3 - 4 “red flags” to watch for (for example, complicated infotainment systems he finds confusing, limited dealer support nearby).
3. Create a simple “decision worksheet” James could use on paper:
- Rows: The 4 vehicle types.
- Columns: Reliability, comfort, long-trip ease, fuel/energy costs, tech complexity, upfront price.
- Instructions for rating each column from 1 - 5 after test drives.
4. Write a short guide (4 - 5 paragraphs) explaining:
- How someone in their early-to-mid 60s can think about balancing cost, comfort, and future needs.
- Why “perfect” information isn’t necessary, but a structured comparison helps.
- How to avoid getting swayed only by the newest tech gadgets.
Write everything in straightforward language for a 63-year-old who wants to feel confident but not overwhelmed.
Use case: James has read dozens of car reviews and watched YouTube videos but still feels lost. He pastes this prompt into AI to turn that vague research into a clear comparison table, good questions to ask, and a scoring worksheet.
Expected result: A practical table comparing four vehicle types; tailored questions and red flags for each; a printable decision worksheet format; and guidance on how to think about the trade-offs at his age and stage.
Pro tip: You can change James’s situation (for example, “59-year-old who tows a small camper,” “68-year-old who mostly drives in the city”) and adjust the four vehicle profiles (for example, add a pickup or a minivan) to fit your actual needs.
Prompt: Create a safe, structured plan to research supplements without getting misled
Copy and paste this:
You are a cautious health research coach helping a 61-year-old named Linda learn about a supplement she is considering.
Linda’s situation:
- Age: 61
- Lives in: Tampa, Florida
- Health background: Mild high blood pressure, slightly elevated cholesterol, takes prescribed medication.
- Supplement she is curious about: Red yeast rice for cholesterol.
Do the following:
1. In 3 - 4 short paragraphs, explain in plain language:
- What red yeast rice is.
- Why some people consider it for cholesterol.
- The main safety concerns a careful doctor might mention (for example, possible liver effects, interactions with other medicines, quality differences between brands).
2. List 5 - 7 types of information sources Linda should focus on:
- For example, “major hospital websites,” “national heart associations,” “government health agencies,” “peer-reviewed medical journals” (describe them as categories, not by name).
For each type:
- Explain why it is more trustworthy.
- Suggest how a non-specialist can use it (for example, “read the patient section, not the technical article”).
3. List 4 - 5 types of sources she should treat with extra caution:
- For example, “blogs promising miracle cures,” “sites that mostly sell products,” “videos with dramatic before/after claims.”
- Explain in plain language what warning signs to look for (for example, “no mention of side effects,” “claims it works for almost every condition”).
4. Create a simple “7-day research plan” for Linda:
- Day 1 - 2: Learn basic facts and safety concerns.
- Day 3 - 4: Read 3 - 4 short articles from higher-quality sources.
- Day 5 - 6: Write down questions for her doctor.
- Day 7: Decide what *not* to do until she talks to her doctor.
For each day, give 2 - 3 specific tasks (for example, “Ask AI to summarize what major hospitals say about red yeast rice safety in 10 bullet points”).
5. End with a doctor conversation script (8 - 10 sentences):
- Include 6 - 8 specific questions she can ask (about how it interacts with her current medicines, whether it fits her situation, and what lab tests might be needed).
- Keep the tone respectful and focused on shared decision-making.
Write everything in non-technical language suitable for a 61-year-old woman who wants to be proactive but safe.
Use case: Linda saw red yeast rice recommended in an online forum and a YouTube video. She pastes this prompt into AI to get a clear overview, a plan to research it safely for a week, and questions to bring to her doctor.
Expected result: A plain-language explanation of red yeast rice and its risks; a list of trustworthy vs. risky source types; a day-by-day research plan; and a ready-made script for a medical appointment.
Pro tip: Replace “red yeast rice for cholesterol” with any supplement or alternative therapy you’re curious about (for example, “turmeric for joint pain,” “melatonin for sleep,” “CBD for anxiety”) to get a tailored safe-research plan.
Prompt: Build a personal “learning habits” system for the next 6 months
Copy and paste this:
You are a habits and learning coach helping a 55-year-old named Alan build a 6-month “learning habits” system.
Alan’s situation:
- Age: 55
- Job: Accountant in Toronto
- Learning goals:
- Improve conversational Spanish.
- Understand basic investing concepts for retirement.
- Read more serious nonfiction (1 book every 2 months).
- Time available: 30 - 45 minutes per day, 5 days per week.
Do the following:
1. Create 3 identity statements for Alan, in the form “I’m the kind of person who…” that fit his situation (for example, “I’m the kind of person who learns a little bit every day, even when work is busy.”).
2. Define 3 core learning habits:
- Habit 1: Spanish practice.
- Habit 2: Investing education.
- Habit 3: Nonfiction reading.
For each habit:
- Describe it in one clear sentence.
- Suggest a realistic daily or near-daily schedule (for example, “15 minutes of Spanish listening + 10 minutes of speaking”).
3. For each of the 3 habits, create:
- One habit stacking formula (for example, “After I finish my morning coffee, I do 15 minutes of Spanish audio.”).
- One environment change at home he can make this week to make the habit easier (for example, “Keep my investing book next to the chair I use after dinner.”).
4. Design a simple weekly tracking system Alan can keep on one sheet of paper:
- List the days of the week across the top.
- List the 3 habits down the side.
- Explain how to mark each box (for example, a simple checkmark and a “+” if the session felt especially good).
- Add a small weekly reflection section with 3 questions (“What worked?”, “What didn’t?”, “One small change for next week”).
5. Create a 6-month overview:
- Months 1 - 2: Getting started and consistency.
- Months 3 - 4: Increasing depth (more complex Spanish, slightly more advanced investing topics).
- Months 5 - 6: Applying what he learned (for example, short Spanish conversations, choosing specific investing actions, finishing 3 books).
For each two-month block, list 4 - 6 concrete milestones (for example, “Hold a 10-minute Spanish conversation with a language partner”).
Write everything in simple, encouraging language for a busy 55-year-old professional.
Use case: Alan keeps meaning to “learn Spanish” and “understand investing” but never sticks with it. He pastes this prompt into AI to get a structured habits system, environment tweaks, and a tracking sheet he can print and use for half a year.
Expected result: Identity statements to support his learning; clear definitions of three habits; habit stacking and environment changes; a one-page tracking system; and a 6-month milestone plan.
Pro tip: Replace Alan’s goals with your three learning goals (for example, “guitar,” “gardening,” “local history”) and time constraints to get a personalized habit system that fits your life.
Prompt: Turn a messy mix of news, blogs, and videos into a balanced summary on a hot topic
Copy and paste this:
You are a neutral summarizer helping a 49-year-old named Priya understand the debate around “AI in education.”
Priya’s situation:
- Age: 49
- Job: College administrator in Chicago
- Background: Reads education blogs, follows some teachers on social media, and sees both excitement and fear about AI.
- Goal: Understand the main arguments for and against AI in education in a balanced way, without getting lost in extreme opinions.
Assume Priya has seen:
- An enthusiastic tech blogger saying AI will “revolutionize learning.”
- A worried teacher on social media saying AI will “destroy students’ ability to think.”
- A cautious article from an education research journal.
Do the following:
1. Create a comparison table with these rows:
- Tech enthusiast blogger.
- Worried classroom teacher.
- Cautious education researcher.
Columns:
- Overall stance (excited, worried, cautious).
- Main claims about benefits of AI in education.
- Main claims about risks or downsides.
- How they suggest schools respond.
- What they might be *overlooking* or underemphasizing.
2. Write a balanced, 5 - 7 paragraph overview for Priya that:
- Summarizes the main opportunities (for example, personalization, help with grading, support for struggling students) in everyday language.
- Summarizes the main concerns (for example, cheating, loss of critical thinking, data privacy, inequality between students).
- Uses calm language and avoids slogans.
3. Create a simple “information filter” Priya can use when reading new pieces about AI in education:
- 4 questions for checking the author’s perspective (for example, “What is this person’s job, and how might that shape their view?”).
- 4 questions for checking the evidence (for example, “Are they citing research, or just giving anecdotes?”).
- 3 questions for noticing emotional language and possible exaggeration.
4. End with 8 - 10 practical questions Priya can bring to a meeting at her college about AI:
- Questions about student learning.
- Questions about teacher workload.
- Questions about equity and access.
- Questions about safeguards and policies.
Write everything in clear, non-technical language suitable for a college administrator who wants to think carefully, not react emotionally.
Use case: Priya hears intense arguments about AI in education at work and online. She pastes this prompt into AI to get a structured comparison, a calm overview, a way to filter future information, and good questions for upcoming meetings.
Expected result: A comparison table of three perspectives; a balanced narrative summary of pros and cons; a practical “information filter”; and a list of smart, concrete questions for institutional discussions.
Pro tip: You can replace “AI in education” with any hot topic you’re trying to understand (for example, “remote work,” “climate policy,” “cryptocurrency regulation”) to get a similar balanced breakdown and question list.
Prompt: Create a visit summary and follow-up plan after a complex doctor appointment
Copy and paste this:
You are a medical visit summarizer helping a 69-year-old named Eleanor make sense of her recent cardiology appointment.
Eleanor’s situation:
- Age: 69
- Lives in: Portland, Oregon
- Health background: High blood pressure, episodes of chest discomfort when walking uphill.
- Recent visit: Saw a cardiologist, had an ECG and stress test, was told she has “stable angina” and was given a new medication and lifestyle recommendations.
- Emotional state: Worried but trying not to panic; wants to remember what was said and what to ask next time.
Do the following:
1. Create a clear visit summary in plain language with these headings:
- “Why I went to the doctor”
- “What tests were done”
- “What the doctor told me”
- “What the doctor recommended (short-term and long-term)”
Under each heading, write 2 - 4 short paragraphs in everyday language, assuming:
- The tests were an ECG and a treadmill stress test.
- The diagnosis was “stable angina.”
- The doctor started a medication for angina and suggested exercise, diet changes, and stress management.
2. Explain “stable angina” in 3 - 4 short paragraphs:
- What it is.
- Why it causes chest discomfort with exertion.
- Why doctors take it seriously but also say many people live with it for years with proper treatment.
- Use simple metaphors (for example, “pipes carrying blood”) but still be accurate.
3. Create a checklist of 10 - 15 specific things Eleanor should keep track of over the next 3 months:
- Symptoms (when, how long, what she was doing).
- Medication use (dose, times, any side effects).
- Activity levels.
- Diet changes.
- Emotional reactions (fear, worry) if relevant.
4. Write a list of 8 - 10 questions she can bring to her next cardiology appointment:
- Clarifying the diagnosis.
- Asking about prognosis.
- Asking about what to do if symptoms change.
- Asking about exercise safety and limits.
5. End with a short, reassuring paragraph (6 - 8 sentences) that:
- Emphasizes that writing things down and asking questions is helpful.
- Encourages her to involve a trusted family member if she wishes.
- Avoids false reassurance but stresses that understanding and following the plan matters.
Write everything in gentle, clear language for a 69-year-old woman who wants to be an informed patient.
Use case: Eleanor left the cardiologist’s office with a stack of papers and a lot of worry. Her son Mark helps her paste this prompt into AI to get a clean summary of what likely happened, a symptom and medication tracking checklist, and smart questions for the follow-up visit.
Expected result: A structured, easy-to-read visit summary; a plain-language explanation of “stable angina”; a 3-month tracking checklist; thoughtful follow-up questions; and a short reassuring note encouraging active participation in her care.
Pro tip: Adjust the details (diagnosis, tests, doctor type) to match your own recent visit (for example, “orthopedist visit for knee arthritis,” “neurologist visit for memory concerns,” “endocrinologist visit for thyroid issues”) and use the same structure to build a summary and action plan.
Love these prompts?
Forward One True Prompt to three people who subscribe and I will send you my free AI Prompt Starter Pack: 20 ready-to-use prompts for everyday life.