Recent Miracles Of God 2026: Modern Day Miracles of God
An evidence-first look at what God is still doing — written for skeptics, and for anyone still waiting on a miracle.
Before You Decide
You already know how this is supposed to go. A religious article promises "proof," delivers three anonymous testimonies, and asks you to feel something.
This one is going to try something harder.
Below you will find named people, dated events, named diseases, named doctors, named medical journals, and links you can open in another tab right now. Where a case has a weakness, I am going to tell you what the weakness is before you find it yourself. Where skeptics have a good counter-argument, I will state it in its strongest form.
All I ask is one thing: suspend the automatic "no" for fifteen minutes. Not belief — just the reflex.
Because there is a rule most modern people carry without ever having examined it: the universe is a closed system, and nothing from outside ever reaches in. That sounds like science. It isn't. No experiment ever produced it. It is a philosophical starting posture, and it quietly decides the verdict on every miracle claim before the first piece of evidence is read.
If you want believers to examine their assumptions — fair. Examine yours too.
The honest question, stripped of religion: is the universe a sealed room, or is there a door?
Everything else follows from that.
But before we begin: if you want a story that explains the link missing in humanity.
→ Read the story of Noah and Biblical aliens (origin of fallen angels & demons) here.
Or better, this article:
→ Story of Noah: Origin Of Demons, Missing species of humanity and ancient aliens.
And if you're really in need of a miracle… read this:
→ 5 Churches Where Miracles Still Happen.
What a Miracle Actually Is
Skeptics usually picture a miracle as nature breaking. Physics glitching. A rule being violated.
That is not what Scripture describes.
Picture a ball rolling across a table. Newton's laws describe its path perfectly. Now reach out and lift the ball. Have you broken the laws of physics? No. Gravity still worked. An agent simply acted inside the system.
That is the biblical model — not the suspension of natural law, but the intervention of a Person into a world He built and still holds together.
Which means miracles have a signature. In Scripture they are almost never random. They are:
Purposeful — they point at something; they are never mere spectacle
Merciful — they overwhelmingly land on the suffering, not the powerful
Personal — they come through relationship, not technique
Revelatory — they disclose the character of the One doing them
Notice that Jesus refused to perform for Herod, who wanted a show (Luke 23:8–9), but healed a beggar shouting on a roadside. That is not inconsistency. That is a pattern — and it is the exact inverse of a con artist's pattern. A fraud performs for the powerful. Jesus performed for the desperate.
"But Miracles Stopped After the Apostles"
This is the most common intellectual off-ramp, so it deserves a straight answer.
The position is called cessationism — the claim that miraculous gifts ended when the last apostle died. The problem is simple: there is no verse that says it.
The passage usually cited is 1 Corinthians 13:8–10, where prophecy and tongues cease "when that which is perfect is come." But the very next line defines the term: "For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face." That is not the completion of a book. That is seeing God directly. It hasn't happened yet.
Meanwhile, on the first day of the Church, Peter announced the opposite:
"And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh... and they shall prophesy." (Acts 2:17–18)
"The last days" is the entire span between the ascension and the return. We are inside that window. The promise was never dated to expire in AD 100.
And Jesus Himself:
"He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do." (John 14:12)
He did not say for forty years. He said he that believeth on me.
Part One: Four Prophets, Four Ministries, Footage You Can Watch
What follows are four African prophets whose ministries have become, for millions of people, the visible answer to "does God still do this?"
I am including the footage so you can look with your own eyes instead of taking my word for anything. Watch at least one before you reach the end.
Prophet Shepherd Bushiri — Malawi & South Africa
Background. Born in 1983 in Malawi, Shepherd Bushiri came from ordinary beginnings and built the Enlightened Christian Gathering (ECG) into one of the largest church movements on the continent. What began as small gatherings became stadium crusades drawing tens of thousands across Southern Africa. Alongside preaching he is known as an entrepreneur and author, and his services are defined by mass prayer, prophetic declaration, and healing.
What people report. Attendees describe an atmosphere they call "thick" — the sense of a Presence entering a room. Testimonies include the sick rising from wheelchairs, deaf ears opening, and worshippers overwhelmed by what they identify as the Holy Spirit.
One recurring feature deserves the skeptic's attention precisely because it has a direct biblical ancestor. In Acts 5:15, the sick were carried into the streets "that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them." Believers report the same phenomenon in his meetings today.
Watch:
Why the "fire and wind" detail matters. A skeptic hears that and thinks theatrics. But it is not a modern invention. The Church was born with exactly those two signs: "Suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind... and there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire" (Acts 2:2–3). If God announced Himself with wind and fire once, the claim that He might do it again is at minimum internally consistent with the source document.
Prophet T.B. Joshua — Nigeria
Background. Temitope Balogun Joshua (1963–2021) was born into poverty in Arigidi Akoko, Ondo State, with little formal education. He founded The Synagogue, Church Of All Nations (SCOAN) in Lagos, which became one of the most visited religious sites in West Africa — pilgrims arriving from Europe, Asia, the Americas and across Africa in numbers large enough to measurably affect religious tourism into Nigeria. He built Emmanuel TV into a global Christian broadcast network watched by millions.
He was also, by any measure, extraordinarily generous: scholarships, rehabilitation programmes for former militants, support for widows, large-scale distribution of aid to the poor.
Sit with the shape of that life, because it is the part skeptics skip. A village boy with no education, no connections and no money ended up consulted by heads of state and sought out by desperate people from four continents. Whatever else you conclude, that trajectory demands an explanation.
What people report. His services were unusually public. Prayer for the sick happened on camera, in front of enormous crowds, broadcast live worldwide. Blind eyes opening. The crippled walking. Deliverance from long-standing affliction. The ministry travelled — Korea, Israel, Latin America — and drew crowds everywhere.
Watch:
The pattern worth noticing. Blind eyes are the single most repeated sign in the Gospels — Bartimaeus (Mark 10), the man born blind (John 9), the two blind men (Matthew 9). And when John the Baptist sat in prison full of doubt and sent messengers to ask whether Jesus was really the Messiah, Jesus did not send back a theological argument. He sent back a list of observable events:
"Go and shew John again those things which ye do hear and see: The blind receive their sight, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the gospel preached to them." (Matthew 11:4–5)
Heaven answers doubt with evidence, not with a lecture. That is not an anti-intellectual religion. That is a religion staking its claim in the observable world — which is exactly what a skeptic should want.
Prophet Uebert Angel — Zimbabwe & UK
Background. Born in 1979 in Zimbabwe, Uebert Angel founded the Spirit Embassy / Good News Church, with congregations and influence spanning Zimbabwe, the United Kingdom and the wider African diaspora. He is an author and businessman as well as a preacher, and teaches extensively on faith, provision, and how the prophetic gift operates. His crusades regularly fill venues across Africa, including Nigeria.
What people report. Two things dominate. First, instantaneous healings under the laying on of hands. Second — and this is the one that makes skeptics sit up — what believers call "miracle money": the sudden, unexplained appearance of finances during services.
Let's be honest about that second one. It is the claim most likely to trigger your alarm. So let's think it through rather than react.
Watch:
Instant Miracles: God's Healing Power Through the Hands of Prophet Angel
Miracle Money Rains in Millions in Auchi at the Command of Prophet Uebert Angel
The theological logic. If you accept a God who created matter from nothing, then multiplying existing matter is a smaller act, not a larger one. And supernatural provision is one of the oldest patterns in Scripture:
Bread appeared on the ground every morning for forty years (Exodus 16)
Ravens delivered food to a starving prophet (1 Kings 17:6)
A widow's jar of oil refused to run empty (1 Kings 17:16)
Another widow's vessels overflowed until she ran out of containers (2 Kings 4:1–7)
Five thousand people ate from a boy's packed lunch (Matthew 14)
Jesus told Peter to pay the temple tax with a coin found in a fish's mouth (Matthew 17:27)
That last one is remarkable and almost never quoted. Jesus performed a currency miracle to settle a tax bill. A God who does that is not embarrassed by money appearing in a meeting.
The right question is never "could God do this?" It is "what is this for?" Provision in Scripture always lands on need — the widow, the hungry, the stranded. That is the test to apply.
Prophet Jeremiah Omoto Fufeyin — Nigeria
Background. Jeremiah Omoto Fufeyin is based in Warri, Delta State, and founded Christ Mercyland Deliverance Ministry. He is known across Nigeria for two things running side by side: a deliverance-focused ministry, and unusually extensive philanthropy — food distribution, cash gifts, scholarships, and sustained support for widows, students and the vulnerable across the Niger Delta and beyond. His weekly services reach a large online audience, and people travel from across Nigeria and West Africa for prayer.
What people report. Loud, physical, joyful worship. Deliverance from what participants describe as demonic oppression. Healing. Prophetic words spoken over individuals in crowds. Testimonies of breakthrough after years of stagnation, restored health, restored families.
Watch:
On the subject of demons. I know. This is where the modern mind fully disengages.
But be consistent. If you reject the demonic because it is invisible and immaterial, you have a problem — because you already believe in dozens of invisible immaterial things: consciousness, mathematics, moral obligation, the number seven. None of them can be weighed. You accept them because of their effects.
And deliverance was not peripheral to Jesus. It was central: "They brought unto him all sick people... and those which were possessed with devils... and he healed them" (Matthew 4:24). He then handed that authority on: "Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy" (Luke 10:19).
As for the dancing — David "danced before the Lord with all his might" until his wife was embarrassed by him (2 Samuel 6:14–16). Restraint has never been the biblical standard for worship. Sincerity has.
A Word About These Four Men
You may have read accusations about one or more of them. Here is the honest frame.
Your ultimate question is not about any of these four men. It is about God. Men are always the weak link — in ministry, medicine, science, journalism and government alike. Corrupt doctors exist; medicine still works.
And Jesus gave a usable test, not a feeling: "By their fruits ye shall know them" (Matthew 7:16). So look at fruit. Scholarships funded. Widows fed. Addicts sober. Marriages rebuilt. Communities changed. Millions who encountered Christ.
One more thing worth saying plainly: counterfeit currency exists only because real currency exists. Nobody forges a banknote for a currency that was never issued. The existence of religious fraud is indirect evidence that there is something genuine worth imitating.
Part Two: Recent Miracles Documented Outside the Church
Here is where the argument gets harder to dismiss.
Everything above is testimony and footage. A skeptic can reasonably say: "No paperwork. No doctors. No journals."
Fair. So let's go to the paperwork.
What follows are cases sitting in peer-reviewed medical literature, in secular medical review panels, and in hostile press archives. Every one is linked. You can open them right now.
1. Lourdes, France — The Shrine That Employs Doctors to Debunk Itself
If you deliberately built an institution designed to reject miracle claims, you would end up with something close to the Lourdes Medical Bureau.
The setup. After a 14-year-old peasant girl named Bernadette Soubirous reported visions at a grotto in 1858, cure claims began pouring in. Rather than celebrate them, the Church did something almost no religious movement does: in 1883 it established a permanent medical office to investigate — and in most cases disprove — them.
The numbers should give a skeptic pause, in the right direction. Over 7,000 cures have been formally claimed. Seventy-two have been recognised. That is a rejection rate above 99%.
Think about what that rate signals. A fraud machine approves. A filter rejects. This institution rejects almost everything that walks through its door.
The seven criteria. For a cure to pass, a panel must agree that:
The disease was serious with an unfavourable prognosis
The disease is known and documented in medicine
The disease is organic and lesional — with objective biological or radiological evidence. Purely psychological, functional or nervous conditions are excluded by rule
No treatment can plausibly account for the recovery
The cure was sudden, instantaneous, without convalescence
It restored full vital function, not merely reduced symptoms
It was permanent, not a remission
Criterion 3 deserves your attention. The Bureau has pre-emptively conceded the placebo objection. It refuses to consider the exact category of illness where placebo works.
The most recent case: Antonietta Raco, recognised April 2025
This is the freshest formally recognised miracle at Lourdes, and it is the strongest of the modern set — because the disease has no known remission in the medical literature at all.
Raco, an Italian woman, began suffering neurological symptoms in 2004 at age 45
She was diagnosed with primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) — a motor neuron disease related to ALS — by Dr. Adriano Chiò, professor of neuroscience at the University of Turin
By 2008 she was wheelchair-bound, with slurred speech, swallowing difficulty confirmed by videofluoroscopy, and lung forced vital capacity down to 56%
She bathed in the Lourdes pools on 31 July 2009. Back home, she stood unaided for the first time in years
At her September 2009 clinic assessment, Dr. Chiò found she could walk independently. Her FVC had risen to 93%. Her swallow study was normal
The file was opened in 2010 and took sixteen years to resolve — including independent assessment by Dr. Vincenzo Silani of the University of Milan, a PLS specialist
The International Medical Committee of Lourdes stalled for years, for an honest reason: the diagnostic criteria for PLS itself were uncertain in the literature. Only after an international diagnostic consensus was published in 2020 and validated in 2024 could the committee vote — 17 in favour, 4 against
On 16 April 2025, Bishop Vincenzo Carmine Orofino declared it the 72nd miracle of Lourdes
Dr. Silani, the neurologist who reviewed her, is quoted directly:
"I am a specialist in motor neuron diseases... The causes are unknown, and the process, once initiated, becomes inexorable... I have never observed a clinical arrest or cure of this pathology... A scientist must always learn and recognise reality, even when it seems humanly incomprehensible. Doubt was a given, but after searching for all possible answers, I resigned myself to the idea of not being able to provide an acceptable scientific explanation today."
That is not a priest talking. That is a professor of neurology conceding the limit of his field.
Sources:
FSSPX News — full account of the 72nd miracle, with Dr. Silani's and Dr. de Franciscis' statements
OSV News / Catholic Standard — the announcement and the 7,000-claim figure
The 70th and 71st, briefly. Sister Bernadette Moriau (70th, recognised 2018) had cauda equina syndrome, four failed surgeries, a spinal neurostimulator, permanent braces and heavy morphine. Days after returning from Lourdes in 2008 she removed the braces; her twisted foot was straight; she stopped morphine and the neurostimulator immediately. Her file was reviewed over eight years by an estimated 300 physicians. Dr. Kieran Moriarty, one of the reviewing specialists, was asked whether any treatment could have produced that recovery. His answer: "No treatment would be that effective that quickly." The 71st, recognised in December 2024, was John Traynor, a British soldier gravely wounded in the First World War.
The full CBS 60 Minutes investigation of the Lourdes process — including on-camera interviews with the reviewing physicians — is here.
One of those reviewers, Jacek Mostwin, professor of urology at Johns Hopkins, described the panel's posture this way: "We're just as technical as a forensic pathologist when it comes to looking at the technical details of the case."
2. Mozambique, 2009 — When Researchers Brought Instruments Into the Field
Here is the objection you have been waiting to raise: "Fine, but nobody ever measures these things properly, with equipment, in the moment."
Someone did.
In 2009 a research team led by Dr. Candy Gunther Brown of Indiana University — with a physician (Dr. Stephen Mory), a Cambridge-trained doctor in tropical medicine (Dr. Rebecca Williams) and a professor from Saint Louis University (Dr. Michael McClymond) — travelled to rural Mozambique carrying an audiometer and standardised "Illiterate E" vision charts.
They tested 24 consecutive subjects reporting hearing (14) or vision (11) impairment, immediately before and immediately after they received hands-on prayer at Christian meetings in the villages of Impiri, Namuno, Chiúre and the city of Pemba.
The results were published in the peer-reviewed Southern Medical Journal, September 2010:
Significant improvement in auditory function: p < 0.003
Significant improvement in visual function: p < 0.02
Two subjects showed hearing thresholds reduced by over 50 decibels
The authors' own conclusion: "The magnitude of measured effects exceeds that reported in previous suggestion and hypnosis studies."
Read the design carefully, because it anticipated your objections:
They deliberately chose hearing and vision precisely because those functions are less susceptible to psychosomatic influence than pain or arthritis — and they say so explicitly, criticising earlier prayer studies for choosing rheumatoid arthritis
Three subjects were excluded for giving false-positive responses during testing
Two subjects who could not be retested were counted as unimproved
The study had IRB approval from Indiana University
Be fair about its limits. Small sample. No control group. High ambient field noise. The authors themselves call for further study rather than claiming proof, and published commentaries in the same journal pushed back.
But that is precisely the point. This is not a testimony video. It is a documented, instrumented, peer-reviewed, methodologically self-critical study sitting in the medical literature that anyone can pull up right now.
Sources:
3. Blindness Reversed — Published in Explore, 2020
This is one of the most striking recent case reports, because the underlying condition is structural and degenerative, not functional.
A woman diagnosed with juvenile macular degeneration had been blind for twelve years, with documented diagnosis. She was instantaneously healed after her husband prayed for her. The case was investigated by the Global Medical Research Institute — a research body that applies evidence-based medical methods to claimed healings — and published as a peer-reviewed case report.
Macular degeneration does not respond to belief. It is retinal tissue.
Sources:
4. Sixteen Years of Feeding Tubes, Ended — Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2019
A male infant began forcefully vomiting at two weeks old and underwent a pyloromyotomy. He did not improve on medical therapy and was diagnosed with gastroparesis, requiring both a gastrostomy (g-tube) and a jejunostomy (j-tube) to be fed. He lived that way for sixteen years.
In November 2011, at a church service, he received prayer and described feeling "an electric shock starting from my right shoulder travelling down through my stomach." He was immediately able to tolerate oral feeding. The tubes were removed four months later. He required no further treatment. More than seven years later he remained symptom-free.
Two details a skeptic should weigh:
His family were cessationists at the time — they believed miracles had ended with the biblical era. This was not a group primed to expect a healing
The case was published in the peer-reviewed Complementary Therapies in Medicine (April 2019), with the follow-up window explicitly documented
He has since entered the medical field himself.
Source: Christian Today — report on the peer-reviewed case
5. Advanced Parkinson's Disease — Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 2021
A female patient born in 1959 had Parkinson's disease at an advanced, rapidly progressive stage, with major debilitating symptoms requiring high doses of oral medication.
In 2012 she experienced what the authors describe as "instantaneous, nearly complete healing" after intercessory prayer. There was no recurrence of her former symptoms; remaining symptoms continued to improve. She regained her full capacities at work and in daily life.
This was not a self-reported testimony. The case was assessed by a medical assessment team at Amsterdam University Medical Centre (VUmc) and classified as "remarkable." The authors' own summary of what happened:
"The clinical course was extraordinary, contradicting data from imaging studies, as well as the common understanding of this disease."
Note the phrase contradicting data from imaging studies. That is objective scan evidence, not a feeling.
Source: PubMed — "My Body Does Not Fit in Your Medical Textbooks" (PMID 33620331)
6. The Dutch Study — 27 Cases, Assessed by a University Medical Team
This one matters because it is a programme, not a single anecdote — and because it is scrupulously unflattering to the believer's case in places, which is exactly why you should trust it.
Between 2016 and 2021, researchers in the Netherlands assembled 27 reported cases of healing after prayer and submitted each to an independent medical assessment team at Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Each case had a documented medical history. The team could classify a recovery as "medically remarkable," "medically unexplained," or neither.
The results, published in the Journal of Religion and Health (2023) and in ScienceDirect:
Eleven of the 27 were assessed as "medically remarkable"
None were labelled "medically unexplained" — the team's highest bar was not met
Recurring characteristics across the cases: a temporal connection with prayer, instantaneity, unexpectedness, strong physical manifestations, and a sense of being overwhelmed and transformed
The study began with a Dutch GP named Dick, whose patient Julia had post-traumatic dystrophy (CRPS) and had been wheelchair-bound with right-sided pain since 1990. In 2007, after seventeen years, she attended a prayer healing session, stood up from her wheelchair and walked without pain. Her condition remained stable for the following fifteen years. Her own doctor searched the literature for an explanation and came up empty — which is how the research began.
I am including the honest half of this result deliberately. Zero cases reached "medically unexplained." A skeptic is entitled to make something of that. But eleven independently assessed "medically remarkable" recoveries clustering around the moment of prayer is not nothing, and no natural mechanism has been offered for the clustering.
Sources:
7. Fátima, Portugal — 13 October 1917
I include this last, out of chronological order, for a specific reason: it is the only case in this article that was announced in advance.
What was claimed beforehand. Three shepherd children — Lúcia dos Santos (10) and her cousins Francisco (9) and Jacinta Marto (7) — said a heavenly figure had told them a public sign would occur at a specific place, on a specific date, at roughly noon, "so that all may believe."
The prediction was printed in newspapers. That is a staggering risk. It gave an entire nation months of notice to gather and stare at one patch of ground at one hour, with every opportunity for total public humiliation.
Who was watching. Estimates of the crowd range between 50,000 and 70,000, standing in heavy rain. Crucially it was not a self-selected devout crowd. Portugal in 1917 was under an aggressively secular First Republic; churches and schools had been seized and public religious festivals banned. Journalists came specifically to mock.
What was reported. The rain stopping. The clouds parting. The sun appearing as a dull silver disc that could be looked at directly without pain, then appearing to spin, throw multicoloured light across the landscape and the crowd, and plunge toward the earth before returning. Many reported that soaked clothing and muddy ground were suddenly dry.
Why it is hard to dismiss. The most detailed contemporary account was filed not by a priest but by Avelino de Almeida, star reporter for O Século — an openly anticlerical Republican newspaper in Lisbon. He arrived a skeptic, wrote mockingly of the pilgrims, and then filed this:
"To the amazed eyes of those people... the sun trembled, the sun had never-before-seen brusque movements beyond all cosmic laws — the sun 'danced'... It still remains for the competent ones to apply judgment to the macabre dance of the sun."
An anti-religious newspaper putting a reported miracle on its front page is not what fabrication looks like. It is what a reporter looks like when he cannot explain what he has just watched.
Father John De Marchi, who spent seven years (1943–1950) in Fátima interviewing witnesses, recorded that among the hundreds who gave formal testimony — believers and scoffers alike — "none to our knowledge has directly denied the visible prodigy of the sun."
Be honest about the counter-arguments. Not everyone saw the same thing. Some saw only colours. Some saw nothing. Skeptics propose retinal effects from staring at the sun, or an unusual atmospheric phenomenon. These are serious proposals and should not be waved off.
But note what they do not explain: the appointment. Optical illusions and cloud phenomena do not RSVP three months in advance to a location chosen by children.
Sources:
What All of This Has in Common
Look at the shape of the body of evidence rather than at any single case.
One case was announced in advance. Fátima was predicted months ahead, with date, time and place printed in newspapers, in front of 50,000–70,000 people including hostile journalists.
One is filtered by a panel built to reject. Lourdes has rejected over 99% of more than 7,000 claims, excludes psychological conditions by rule, and had its most recent case reviewed for sixteen years by named neurology professors who publicly stated they could not explain it.
One brought instruments into the field. Mozambique fixed its protocol before subjects were prayed for, used calibrated audiometry, excluded false-positive responders, counted untestable subjects as failures, and published in a peer-reviewed medical journal where it was then publicly criticised.
Four are in the medical literature as case reports. Twelve-year blindness from macular degeneration. Sixteen years of feeding tubes for gastroparesis, in a family that did not believe in miracles. Advanced Parkinson's, with a recovery that contradicted imaging data, assessed by a university hospital team. Eleven "medically remarkable" recoveries out of 27 cases assessed by that same team.
Now notice something.
Each case carries a genuine counter-argument. I will not pretend otherwise, and you should not trust anyone who does. But notice that the counter-arguments are all different.
One needs an optical illusion. One needs an improbable run of spontaneous remissions in a disease with no documented remissions. One needs measurement error in calibrated audiometry. One needs a misdiagnosis of retinal degeneration. One needs sixteen years of feeding-tube dependence to have been unnecessary. One needs Parkinson's imaging data to have been wrong.
To dismiss the whole body of evidence, you need a separate ad-hoc explanation for every single case. That is not one theory. That is a series of individual rescues, each invented to protect a conclusion you brought with you.
At some point a simpler explanation becomes available. And the reason it still feels unavailable is not that the evidence is weak. It is that the conclusion is costly.
Part Three: The Serious Objections
You deserve real answers, not slogans. Here are the strongest arguments against everything above, taken seriously.
"Hume proved miracles are always irrational to believe"
David Hume argued that since a miracle violates uniform human experience, the evidence against it will always outweigh any testimony for it.
It sounds airtight. It is circular, and the circle is easy to see once pointed out.
Hume claims human experience is uniformly against miracles. How would he know that? Only by first dismissing every single report of a miracle as false. He assumes his conclusion in order to build his premise: miracles never happen, therefore reports of miracles are false, therefore miracles never happen.
By that same logic, no genuinely unprecedented event could ever be rationally believed — which would have made meteorites, germ theory and continental drift permanently irrational to accept. Every one of those was dismissed by experts because it contradicted "uniform experience."
Evidence is supposed to shape expectations. Hume's rule uses expectations to forbid evidence. That is backwards.
"It's the placebo effect"
Sometimes it is, and honest believers should say so plainly. Emotional environments produce real physiological effects. Pain perception shifts. Adrenaline masks symptoms. Christians should not pretend otherwise.
But placebo has known boundaries. Placebo does not regrow tissue. It does not restore an optic nerve or reverse macular degeneration. It does not raise forced vital capacity from 56% to 93%. It does not end sixteen years of feeding-tube dependence permanently. It does not contradict Parkinson's imaging data.
Placebo affects subjective symptoms — pain, fatigue, mood. It does not reverse objective structural pathology. And note that Lourdes rules out functional and psychological conditions by criterion, and the Mozambique team chose hearing and vision specifically to avoid this objection.
The placebo objection covers part of the ground honestly. It does not cover the strongest cases. An explanation that covers 60% of the data is not a refutation of the other 40%.
"It's emotional manipulation and crowd psychology"
Again — sometimes, yes. Crowds are suggestible. Music, expectation and social pressure are powerful. Any honest believer has to concede this.
But run the objection in reverse. Crowd psychology explains why someone might feel healed. It does not explain why a man blind for thirty years walks home reading. It explains excitement, not outcomes.
And note that it proves too much. If emotional crowds automatically produced healings, football stadiums and concert arenas would be the world's most effective hospitals. They are not.
It also does not touch the documented cases. Nobody was in a crowd when Antonietta Raco stood up at home in Basilicata. Nobody was chanting when a Dutch GP's patient stayed pain-free for fifteen years afterward.
"Show me a peer-reviewed, double-blind study"
This is a fair demand in spirit, but it contains a category error.
A double-blind trial tests a repeatable mechanism — a drug that behaves the same way in every subject. Miracles, by definition, are not a mechanism. They are the acts of a Person. You cannot run a controlled trial on a free agent, any more than you could design a double-blind study to prove your mother loves you.
Personal agency is not established by repetition. It is established by evidence and testimony — which, incidentally, is exactly how courts of law establish the most serious facts in human society, including guilt, innocence and death.
That said: the peer-reviewed literature above is real. Southern Medical Journal. Explore. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine. Journal of Religion and Health. The evidence base is not empty. It is simply not shaped like a pharmaceutical trial — because it is not that kind of thing.
"Why is it always somewhere else? Why Africa?"
Fair question, and it deserves a real answer rather than a defensive one.
Part of the answer is sociological. Much of the Western world has spent three centuries training itself out of a supernatural worldview. That training is thorough. Where the possibility of divine action has been culturally erased, people do not ask for it — and do not recognise it when it comes.
But note the documented cases in this article: Portugal. France. Italy. The Netherlands. The United States. Mozambique. It is not only Africa.
And there is a deeper answer, in the text. Of Jesus in His own hometown Scripture says something startling: "He did not many mighty works there because of their unbelief" (Matthew 13:58).
Read that again. The power was not reduced. The reception was.
Faith is not the payment for a miracle. It is the posture that receives one. Miracles are not distributed by geography. They are distributed by hunger. Much of Africa has retained something the modern West traded away: a worldview in which God is near, the unseen is real, and prayer is the first response to crisis rather than the last.
That is not superstition. It may be the older and more accurate map.
The Question Nobody Asks a Skeptic
Here is something I would genuinely like you to sit with.
Suppose God proved Himself to you tomorrow, beyond all possible doubt. A verified, undeniable, video-documented, medically confirmed miracle performed at your personal request.
What would change in your life?
Because if the honest answer is "not much," then evidence was never really the obstacle. Something else was.
This is not an accusation. It is an observation from the text itself. Jesus performed signs so undeniable that His enemies never once disputed that they happened. Read the Gospels closely: the Pharisees never say "that healing was faked." They say "He casteth out devils by Beelzebub" (Matthew 12:24). They accepted the event and reinterpreted the source — because accepting the obvious source would have cost them everything.
Jesus put it precisely: "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead" (Luke 16:31).
That is a shockingly bold claim. And history tested it. One did rise from the dead — and many still were not persuaded.
Belief has never been purely an evidence problem. It is a willingness problem wearing an evidence costume.
If You Are the One Waiting on a Miracle
Some of you did not come here to argue. You came because you are tired, and you are hoping.
So let me speak to you directly, and honestly.
Nothing in this article guarantees you a healing. I will not do that to you. Seven thousand people brought their claims to Lourdes and seventy-two were recognised. Antonietta Raco waited five years in a wheelchair before that July day, and then sixteen more before anyone official said the word "miracle." Sister Bernadette Moriau went through four surgeries first. The young man with the feeding tubes waited sixteen years.
God is not a vending machine, and anyone selling you a formula is selling you something.
But here is what the evidence in this article does establish, and you are allowed to hold onto it:
Your case is not automatically closed. A disease with no documented remission in world literature remitted in 2009, and it took the world's leading specialist in that disease sixteen years to say he could not explain it.
You do not need to have great faith. The gastroparesis family did not even believe healing still happened. It happened anyway.
It does not require a stadium. Raco stood up in her own house. A Dutch woman stood up in a small meeting. A woman regained her sight after her husband prayed.
Delay is not denial. Almost every documented case in this article involved years of waiting first.
And there is something else worth saying, because it is the part that actually holds people through the waiting.
Miracles were never the point.
A healed body still eventually dies. Lazarus walked out of a tomb — and died again later. Every person Jesus healed in the first century is dead today. An emptied wheelchair is a beautiful thing, and it is temporary.
So what were they for? Signs. That is the actual biblical word — semeion, a sign. A sign is not a destination. A road sign reading "London 40 miles" is not London. Its entire purpose is to make you look somewhere else.
John says it outright:
"Many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name." (John 20:30–31)
The miracle is the sign. Jesus is the destination.
Which means the greatest miracle available to you today is not the healing of a body. It is the forgiveness of a life — a person who was closed, cynical, guilty and afraid becoming genuinely new. That happens every day, in millions of people, and it is the one miracle that lasts past the grave.
And here is what should arrest a skeptic: that particular miracle requires your permission. God heals bodies unilaterally. He does not save souls without consent. Everything Christianity offers, at its centre, is a door that opens from the inside.
The Invitation
The best answer ever given to a skeptic was three words long.
When Nathanael heard about Jesus, he sneered: "Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?" (John 1:46). It was cynical, dismissive, superior — exactly the kind of remark you would make.
Philip didn't argue. He didn't produce evidence. He said:
"Come and see."
That is all this article is.
Watch the footage. Open the PubMed links. Read the O Século dispatch from 1917. Look at the faces of ordinary people in the moment something they had given up on happens to them. You do not have to conclude anything yet.
Then do the harder thing. Pray — even if it feels absurd. Even if you are not sure anyone is listening. Say something honest, like:
"God, if You are real, and if Jesus is who He claimed to be, show me. I am willing to know the truth, whatever it costs me."
That is not a religious formula. It is honesty, and honesty is the only thing God has ever required as a starting point. The promise attached to it is old and specific: "Ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart" (Jeremiah 29:13).
The miracles of God did not end at Calvary, or at Pentecost, or when the last apostle died. They continue in Lagos and Warri, in Johannesburg and Harare, in a village in Basilicata and a clinic in Amsterdam, in hospital corridors and living rooms, in packed stadiums and half-empty village churches. They happen wherever someone is desperate enough, or humble enough, to take God at His word.
The door in the sealed room was opened once, at the beginning of everything.
It has never been shut.
Jesus gave Himself to open the way. He is still waiting to receive you. All you ever need to do is pray.
"Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh: is there any thing too hard for me?" — Jeremiah 32:27
The evidence is on the table. It always was.
The question was never whether there is enough of it. The question is what you will do with it.
The impossible is possible with God.
A miracle can still happen today.
Today might be yours.
A Note on Sources
Every claim in Part Two is linked to a primary or reported source: PubMed abstracts, journal DOIs, the Lourdes medical association's own documentation, contemporary 1917 newspaper reporting, and broadcast investigations by the BBC and CBS 60 Minutes. Where a study has methodological limits, those limits are stated in the text rather than hidden. Readers are encouraged to verify each one independently — that is the entire spirit of the article.
If you made it to the end… congrats.
And if you're ever in doubt of the existence of Jesus.
Read it here: 10 Historical Evidences of Jesus Outside The Bible.