A decade or so ago, I got myself into what I believe the youth call “Twitter beef” when I called out a tech conference happening in London with an all-male speaker lineup. I posted a ranty tweet and a blogpost, then went to bed. I woke up the next morning to some understandably angry responses from the conference organisers, an invitation to appear on Woman’s Hour, and, eventually, international media coverage.
I learned a lot of things in the aftermath, including about right-to-reply, accurate use of statistics, and media scheduling challenges (I never did make it onto Radio Four). So I was a bit surprised to see essentially the same thing happen again this week with a conference whose organiser, um, invented fictional women speakers to avoid creating the dreaded “manel”.
I saw this story covered on the venerably ancient tech news blog Slashdot, which has a userbase of grumpy sysadmins who fear change. The prevailing opinion amongst the below-the-line commenters there was: why should the software industry keep pandering to women when they clearly don’t want to work in programming?
I’m not going to bother rehearsing the well-known rebuttals or even engaging with this fatuous argument: it belongs in the past (much like Slashdot itself; I’m not sure why I still read it). But it struck me that some people still really do believe that there are, well, boy jobs and girl jobs.