Last Week's New Yorker Review

Subscribe
Archives
August 11, 2025

Last Week's New Yorker Review: 🄐 The Weekend Special (August 18)

The Weekend Special

Pieces are given up to three
Knapps (for fiction), Downeys (for essays), or Fords (for random picks). As with restaurant stars, even one Knapp, Downey, or Ford indicates a generally positive review.

🄐 Fiction

ā€œThe Corn Woman, Her Husband, and Their Childā€ by Annie Proulx. No Knapps. marriage, mavericks, magma. Certainly better than Proulx’s previous very long return-to-fiction misfire, because at least her descriptive prose is largely convincing here. Still, this reads like a talented stylist’s exercise in free writing; an attempt to continue a story every day, including plenty of information on whatever Proulx has decided to research or read about, with no particular thought as to its overall meaning or shape. The ending tries to wrap things up by returning to the start, but it’s not at all convincing. The best material here, which at least sparks with the risk of thought, concerns Goldie’s trans identity and her mother’s tortured reaction; because there is little to no psychological interiority here, though, it’s very hard to tell how anyone feels about anything, which is the heart of the matter. It’s all endless information and discourse, plus clunky dialogue that seems to be heavily telegraphing its point – yet never actually makes that point clear. Can anything mean anything in this relentless swirl of information? If you can read this whole story without your eyes glazing over, you’re better than I. Proulx neither rejects nor takes advantage of the tools of narrative. There is, certainly, a circus-act wonder at this almost-ninety-year-old legend fearlessly making a mess. But she seems to be aiming at a psychologically acute portrait of human existence; that she’s arrived, instead, at a gonzo postmodern jumble of signifiers can’t quite be taken as a success.

🄐 Weekend Essay

ā€œWhat It’s Like to Brainstorm with a Botā€ by Dan Rockmore. No Downeys. collaboration, colleague, convincing. The slopper doth protest too much, methinks.

🄐 Random Pick

ā€œA Kind of Dancerā€ by Suzannah Lessard. (January 9, 1989.) No Fords. neoclassical, narrow, nature. Rieti’s music is a witty reconfiguration of the tropes of traditional orchestration which still takes obvious pleasure in those tropes; it’s not the worst thing, but it is a little lightweight, and I’m not inherently interested in the guy’s life. Still, I was enjoying this for its first half – and then the second half is a mostly-quoted interview that repeats nearly all the information from the first half over again. Why?! The piece just ends up too long, and repetitive. Plus, I never got the sense Lessard is a subject-matter expert, necessarily; her take on Rieti’s avant-garde contemporaries is needlessly dismissive. (Sure, Winthrop Sargeant was needlessly dismissive of much the same thing, but he was contemporaneous; plus, that was his brand.) Still, she can write; this has the magazine’s traditional erudite bounce. In the regular edition, this would be a very high ā€œSkipā€; it’s easily the best of the three pieces in this Special. But there’s just no particular reason to dig for it in the archives.

🄐 Something Extra

I had the most incredible meal at CafƩ Mado the other day. They are doing unspeakable things with summer produce.

…Hey, not like that! Ew!


Sunday Song:

Don't miss what's next. Subscribe to Last Week's New Yorker Review:
Start the conversation:
Powered by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.