Last Week's New Yorker Review: š± The Weekend Special (June 23)
The Weekend Special
Pieces are given up to three Boyles (for fiction), Harrimans (for essays), or Parkers (for random picks). As with restaurant stars, even one Boyle, Harriman, or Parker indicates a generally positive review.
The newsletter will continue in spite of the war.
š± Fiction
āAny Human Heartā by Yiyun Li. No Boyles. marriage, matter, malevolence. Among the most profoundly depressive things I can recall the magazine publishing of late; curdled and even hateful. Li is allowed a portion of this, and she keeps it compelling, but while Liās style suggests that any judgement the reader might make is indeterminate and cloudy, I donāt think thereās a reasonable way to read this story in which Maureen is anything other than profoundly cruel, with the narrator comparing her to āthe executioners at Dachauā, and suggesting that her mother passed a childhood wound on, transformed, to her. Philosophically, I donāt necessarily have an issue with the view that āreal human crueltyā is āarticulableā and in some sense ever-present, though Iām more of the view that the human condition is one of falling short and misunderstanding, and that incomprehension is in truth so central to our travails that the hyperfocus on mere evil, which so often soaks up the spotlight, obscures more than it reveals. Iām not sure Li advances any perspective that wasnāt rendered in her very strong memoir-excerpt, and the suggestion that this story will present an outside consciousness proves mostly a red herring; Maureen is more an object of judgement than a true subject, and the plot mainly tracks Lilian, Liās stand-in ā also seen in prior stories. Liās prose is very strong, in her stark way, but this story is startlingly uninterested in empathy. Who wants a bouquet of flowers from someone who doesnāt like you?
š± Weekend Essay
āThe Old Manā by Jelani Cobb. Two Harrimans. growing, grappling, graying. A heartfelt personal essay about Cobbās father. Straightforward and content to leave its broader significance as subtext, probably a wise move; the reader can be trusted to infer the many ways in which the personal is political. Cobb doesnāt try to subvert the form; each beat and pivot arrives on cue, but the genuinely touching material and Cobbās usual steady, sane intelligence are a good match āĀ they leaven one another, so that the piece is neither sappy nor dry. This doesnāt have the punch or power of, say, Wesley Morrisā landmark mustache essay, which it somewhat resembles. But not everything has to aim for Pulitzers. Cobb does his job with the wisdom of age.
š± Random Pick
āOf All Thingsā by Howard Brubaker. (Oct 12, 1940). One Parker. will, weather, war. These talk-show-ish political quips were apparently a popular feature of the Ross magazine. Thereās something fascinating about them, a peek into 1940s Twitter āĀ but the only really funny one is the first, about Hitler and Mussolini ābreaking bread and treaties together.ā
Alright, that was quite short, hereās another.
š± Random Pick 2
āAliveā by Brendan Gill. (May 18, 1963). No Parkers. rave, revelation, ragamuffiny. Gill adores all three pictures under review, but especially the now-largely-forgotten Sparrows Canāt Sing, which he compares to Ulysses with only a hint of abashedness. Gillās writing is amiable and gossipy, but it doesnāt give a very good sense of what any of these movies are like āĀ especially Bergmanās Winter Light, which he grants only a perfunctory synopsis, a warning against its bleakness, and some generic praise (ābeautifulā). Gill had an extraordinarily long tenure at the magazine and wrote for basically every section; his Times obit doesnāt even mention his movie reviews, which ran for the first six years of the sixties. I do now want to see Sparrows Canāt Sing, though I doubt Iād get as much en-Joyce-ment from it.
š± Something Extra
Previously I promised a review of Bowl EP, a visceral (in a few ways) slice-of-life show about two skaters engaging in some life-bringing time-wasting. Itās a bumpy ride, but I think itās the strongest small-ensemble Iāve seen ā the leads are each phenomenally lived-in, entirely believable but pivoting to showier moments without a hitch; a surprise supporting performance is brasher and hugely compelling as acting if not always as writing. The set, an empty swimming pool used as a skate rink, is hook enough; itās the kind of genuinely subversive theater that makes a lot of other stuff look like kiddie shit. And it just closed. Your loss!
I also saw Prince F*ggot, Jordan Tannahillās meta romance about queerness and power, which is now competing with the other Shayok Misha Chowdhury-directed show for my favorite play of the year. Going in blind does help, but if you arenāt convinced by the cast or my rave, well, you can find a synopsis. A show that carves away at its premise over time, finding deep pockets but never forgetting to deliver the goods āĀ tears in the rain, self-abnegation in the club. I sobbed through the last twenty-some minutes. See it, see it, see it, see it, see it, see it. It just got extended through July 27 and itās already sold out, but maybe itāll get extended again; you can also show up to 99 cent Sundays and wait in line. Itās worth it.
John Proctor is the Villain I largely found politically frustrating, setting up a situation in which there is no actual nuance to make sure it doesnāt have to address any nuance in its vision of liberation (which doesnāt actually look that liberating) ā but it undeniably achieves its aims, and the cast is just fantastic, especially Amalia Yoo, who earned that Drama Desk.
The Publicās bilingual outdoors traveling Much Ado is imperfect but very fun. If it will be near you, I can hardly imagine a nicer afternoon.
Sunday Song:
Add a comment: