You could just, like, give him a new head, right. Is that now how Frankenstein's monsters work

Bizarro, 12/6/23

A fun fact is that while "Frankenstein," in the sense of a story about creature sewn together from corpses and reanimated via forbidden science with unexpected results, is in the public domain, Frankenstein's monster, in the sense of the green-skinned corpse guy with a flat head and bolts in his neck, is the intellectual property of Universal Studios, for whom that design was created in 1931. I really had it in my mind that the flat top of the head was meant to indicate that the skull had been sliced open to drop a brain into it, but I can't find any citation to that now; however, the Wikipedia article for Frankenstein's monster does have the unsettling note that "Jack P. Pierce ... based the monster's face and iconic flat head shape on a drawing Pierce's daughter (whom Pierce feared to be psychic) had drawn from a dream." Anyway, today's strip raises a lot more questions than it answers: are the Monster and his Bride having sex, reproductively, and are their corpse-mangled qualities passed down to their offspring via some Lamarckian mechanism? Or did the pair conspire to reproduce the sins of their creator, assembling in their own image a son from scavenged corpse parts, continuing the hideous cycle? Also, is the kid's full name "Frankenstein's Monster Junior," and does he get mad if people just call him or his father "Frankenstein?" I honestly care about all this much more than his potential head injury situation.

Rex Morgan, M.D., 12/6/23