|
Following the October 17 protests, the French government is facing a political crisis, with heightened tensions between the executive and La France Insoumise (LFI). Government and other parties accuse LFI of inciting violence, leading to the President of the Senate, Gérard Larcher, suggesting the possibility of banning the left-wing party. Critics also draw parallels between the government's current methods and past actions in New Caledonia, suggesting an authoritarian drift.
Mediapart:
After October 17, the government is on edge
Following protests on October 17, the French executive is attempting to survive a political crisis amidst opposition pressure and promises to avoid repeating past mistakes in managing public demonstrations.
Le Monde:
October 17 Protests: A Fierce Standoff Between LFI and the Government Tightens…
The executive branch, along with centrist, right-wing, and far-right parties, accuse the 'insoumis' of inciting violence. The President of the Senate suggested that the possibility of banning La France Insoumise could be considered.
Mediapart:
Before October 17, the Kanak precedent illuminates government methods
The government's actions and communication since the October 17th violence echo events in New Caledonia after revolts in 2024, involving scapegoating, restricting freedoms, and authoritarian drift, all likely to fail.
Mediapart:
October 17 mobilization: the tipping point
Reflecting on the October 17 mobilization, the article suggests that while struggles converged in the marches, the executive used the violence to impose its narrative and advance authoritarianism and repression.
Mediapart:
In the October 17 marches, 'a non-white population, long invisible, claiming…
A political sociology researcher highlights deep anger and the emergence of a "racized youth from working-class neighborhoods" mobilizing and making their voices heard during the October 17 demonstrations.
|
