Can Historians Be...Imaginative?
The Drafting the Past newsletter is free to all. If you would like to help keep the podcast and newsletter going, you can support Drafting the Past on Patreon.
First, a big thank you to everyone who signed up for a call to give me feedback about Drafting the Past. I've been enjoying these conversations so much—it's surprisingly lovely to remember that there are real listeners on the other side of my microphone, and that I'm not just yelling into a faceless void, even though it sometimes feels that way.
I'm also getting lots of helpful information about what you all value most about the podcast. If you didn't get a chance to sign up for a call and there's something you want to share, don't worry! A show survey will be out near the end of the year to collect feedback more broadly. And you're always welcome to hit 'reply' to this email to send me a note!
Episode 72 with Joanne Paul Out Now
Does it make you nervous to hear a historian talk about using imagination in their work? Or do you, like this week's guest Dr. Joanne Paul, think imagination is essential to what we do?
For Episode 72: Joanne Paul Isn't Afraid to Call Herself an Artist, I talked with Joanne about how she rediscovered the artist inside her and the difference between imagination and invention for historians. The latter is largely off-limits, but the former is what enables us to write scenes that bring readers right into the story alongside our historical figures. Plus, she shares how she applies screenwriting tools to her work, along with some of the screenwriting resources she finds most helpful!
I gobbled up Joanne's books The House of Dudley and Thomas More: A Life, and I think you'll get a lot out of this conversation. I did!
(Note: Links to bookshop.org are affiliate links. If you make a purchase through one of these links, Drafting the Past gets a small cut that helps to keep the show going. Affiliate income so far: $77.40.)