I’m in the middle of writing my thesis so I can finally get my PhD and put an end to this long chapter of my life and the only thing I can think about is how it’s all been a prayer. It starts with a mystery, as all good prayers do. It is followed by doubt and misery. It ends with awe.
I remember the exact moment I realized I was built for worship. I lay on my back on the top of a mountain. The next day there would be fog, but that night was clear enough to see every star in the sky. You could hear the ocean far below, crashing. I was sixteen or seventeen years old. I remember thinking, I will never be able to fathom this. We are so small, and this majesty is so beautiful. I don’t remember saying anything out loud, but I must have, because last month my sister-in-law turned to me and told me, I will never forget what you said that night.
I was reading up on the Hungarian scientist Albert Szent-Györgyi, who discovered how muscles contract and first isolated Vitamin C, for which he was awarded the 1937 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. During World War II he had to operate a black market enterprise just to house and feed his laboratory staff. Coincidentally, he was philosophically against the idea of writing grants and asking for money, preferring to be funded by rich patrons instead, which he found when he started a lab in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. He liked dividing scientists into two categories: The physiologist who “carefully preserves
structure and subtle qualities” and the biochemist who “willfully destroys them”. (Szent-Györgyi, 1949) In a letter to Science, he writes of two other categories: the Apollonian who “tends to develop established lines to perfection”, and the Dionysian who “relies on intuition and
is more likely to open new, unexpected alleys for research”. Of course, he identifies himself as both the destroying biochemist and the intuitive Dionysian (Szent-Györgyi, 1972). With apologies to Professor Szent-Györgyi, I identify very much as an Apollonian, though I’m very much not looking for perfection.
Part of writing a thesis is to place your meager findings within the context of decades of work. It’s a humbling and rewarding task. You sit on the shoulders of geneticists who knew nothing, not the names of genes, not the paths of their transduction, not the signals, not the receptors. They just had syringes and microscopes and dreams, and then forty years later, here I am, adding mystery to the mystery.