The OctoPost logo

The OctoPost

Subscribe
Archives
August 17, 2025

The OctoPost: Feet, Comic-Con, and a Software Life Cycle

A photo from the "How To Draw An Octopus" panel at comic-con shows the seated audience looking at a large screen, on which is projected the title of the panel, an octopus eye, and the three in-progress drawings of the panelists. Text overlaid on the photo is connected with an arrow to each of the three drawings, explaining what's in them. The text reads, "Sam: Start with simple shapes to draw an octopus. Josue: Make it a character with posture and expression. Danna: Scribble over anything you don't like and say it inked."
Three-way live drawing workshop at Comic-Con. Photo by Kathryn Gonzalez, edited by me.

Cephalopod News

By recording detailed 3D video of the “Octopus Garden” where thousands of octopuses gather at deep-sea hot springs, scientists can now describe exactly how these animals use their arms to move. In the words of lead scientist Kakani Katija, “We learned that octopus crawl by creating a modified foot that persists throughout the behavior, a simplification that could aid roboticists.”

Octopuses are mollusks, the same group that includes snails and clams. A core feature of all mollusks is a large muscular foot—snails ooze on it, clams dig with it, and octopus ancestors developed it into a plethora of sucker-lined arms. Learning that these complex appendanges are (sometimes) used as ordinary feet . . . well, I had to tease.

A simply drawn two-panel comic of a snail and octopus. In the first panel, the snail says, "Wow! Where did you get all those arms?" The octopus, looking smug, answers, "My ancestors evolved them from a boring foot like yours." The snail responds, "RUDE. Well how do you move?" In the second panel, the octopus, looking sheepish and approximating a two-fingers-touching gesture with its arms, says, "I, uh . . . create a modified foot." The snail laughs "HAH!" with unfettered molluscan joy.

Seriously, it’s very cool research with a very cool tool. Many thanks to my friend Sam for being the first to send it my way! Using a sophisticated 3D camera to record octopuses in situ has a double benefit over studying animals in the lab: the data more accurately represent real-world behavior, and the octopuses don’t experience the stress of captivity.

Speaking of captivity, this is a fascinating article: A marine biologist and an octopus walk into a prison, leading incarcerated students in a discussion of intelligence, confinement, and connection.

Many wanted to know about the animals’ quality of life. Asking “Is she bored in there all day?” or more to the point “Is she ok?”

It’s a poignant example of the empathy toward octopuses that I’m seeing more and more.

My News

Last month, I attended San Diego Comic-Con as a professional panelist! This enormous gathering of geeks (summary and photos) offers more activities than you can shake a lightsaber at. In our one day at the con, my family caught a talk by famous cartoonists, a paint-your-own miniatures session, a live Dungeons & Dragons cooking competition, and a screening of student animated films.

And, of course:

Promo image for How to Draw an Octopus, Sunday July 27, 4pm, Room 3, at San Diego Comic-Con. Photos of the three panelists with their book titles appear at the bottom: SS Julian (Octopolis: Holdfast), Danna Staaf (Monarchs of the Sea), Josue Cruz (Puppy Knights!). Josue made this incredible design, which also includes cephalopod art from each of us and a fantastic edit of the SDCC logo with an octopus eye where the regular logo has a human eye. It's SO COOL y'all.

We were scheduled for the last slot on the last day, and hoped to attract maybe 50 attendees, but, well, I’ll just quote Sam’s lovely reflections:

30 minutes before our panel began, we saw a line forming outside the room. You may not have guessed this, but the people of comic-con love to draw. And it turns out, they love octopuses, too! That line stretched all the way around the corner of the entrance, and when the last panel wrapped up, that room was filled to the brim. There were, by my estimate, over 300 people at the panel. People had to be turned away!

With the enthusiasm of the audience and the expertise of fellow panelists, it became easily one of the best hours I’ve spent on a stage. We chatted about the sea change in pop culture’s perception of octopus characters, from villains like Doc Ock to heroes like Marcellus. Then we dove into octopus anatomy, and thence to the hands-on part of the workshop.

A photo of SS Julian, Josie Cruz and Danna Staaf on a panel at San Diego Comic-con 2025
Photo by Kathryn Gonzalez

Josue (an AV whiz as well as an incredible cartoonist) had arranged our setup so the audience could watch all three of us draw at once, and attendees were given paper and pencils to follow along. We learned so much from each other and from the audience’s fantastic questions!

We’ll be able to share a full video soon, and in the meantime, here’s a delightful trailer. I’m grateful to Sam and Josue for the panel experience, to Kathryn and Sarah for documenting, and to my family for endless support.

I brought 17 copies of my OctoPunch comic (shared last October) turned into a zine, which obviously wasn’t enough. I asked my lovely husband to hand them out to only the children in the audience; we still ran out.

Photo of my hand holding a mini one-sheet-of-paper zine with all the zine-making materials on a table in the background: unfolded papers, scissors, stapler, scraps of paper and a pile of finished zines. The cover says "OCTOPUNCH by Danna Staaf" and has a drawing of an octopus giving a big comic book punch with one arm.

I will definitely make more for future events!

If you’re not already subscribed to the OctoPost, which provides updates on my appearances and publications as well as delivering all the cephalopod news that’s fit to ink, you can sign up here.

Funny Pages

The aforementioned lovely husband does many kinds of engineering, and our work often cross-pollinates in whimsical ways. Hence today’s comic, which I’ll explain in more detail below.

A speculative natural history illustration that presents "software" as a type of lepidopteran (moth or butterfly). It is made in traditional media (paper, ink, alcohol markers). The title is SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE and it begins in the upper left. "Software eggs are laid on paper napkins..." says the text next to three beautiful blue spheres on a white napkin. An arrow leads past the text "...they hatch into larvae, or 'alphas'..." to point at a rather horrible little yellow caterpillar-ish thing. An arrow leads from this past the text "...which grow through instars called 'versions'..." to point at a larger, lumpier, and hairier version. This version retains the yellow coloration, with the addition of a green spotted portion to its body. A third arrow leads onward, past the text "...forever.", to a still larger and more horrible version. This one is still yellow, and green spotted, and now also purple and red striped. From this abomination, two arrows peel off, both with question marks. One leads back to the napkin with the text, "Has the juvenile evolved through neoteny to reproduce without maturing?" Another leads down to faintly colored outline of what might be a quite stunning moth or butterly. The text next to this hypothetical creature reads, "Naturalists theorize that software should metamorphose into a beautiful final form, but this has never been observed." In the lower right is the text "natural illustration: Danna Staaf; software consultant: Anton Staaf."

In the Silicon Valley mythos, brilliant ideas begin as scribbles on paper napkins. A first attempt at writing the software is called the “alpha version.” After it’s revised into a “beta version,” it gets tested and further revised. In theory, revision continues until the software functions exactly as intended without any bugs, at which point it is released into the wild. In practice, software gets shipped when deadlines become unignorable, and continues to be patched and updated indefinitely.

Don't miss what's next. Subscribe to The OctoPost:
Join the discussion:
Gray
Aug. 17, 2025, morning

I would gently suggest a reframe of the correctional facility visit. While I understand the orientation toward octopuses, I think a more interesting conclusion than, “look at all the ways and places we’re finding care for octopuses,” is perhaps, “if we earnestly respect octopus intelligence to be so advanced that we do not completely comprehend it, what can we learn from the lived experiences of women (and probably non-binary people) at a corrections facility — in human captivity — that might give us insight into both how we treat octopuses in captivity and how we treat our fellow humans?” I was so moved to hear that the participants expressed concern for the octopuses who even die to escape. I wouldn’t begrudge someone with that much on their plate to not spend their time worrying about an animal they have no relationship with, and yet here they all are, people and octopus, bonded by what appears to be similar sentiments and experiences. (Note: my intention isn’t to condemn octopus captivity; I do think, however, that every idea worth acting upon deserves analysis.)

While my experiences aren’t identical, I also felt deeply for La’Darion, as I’m also a disadvantaged aspiring marine biologist who wants to study octopuses, and if your life doesn’t go exactly the right way, the goal feels impossible! I wish her the best and sincerely hope the educators follow up with her in a more meaningful way.

I’m sincerely looking forward to when your drawing panel is posted; I hope you update us when that happens!

Best wishes!

Reply Report
The OctoPost
Aug. 18, 2025, morning

I appreciate this perspective and suggestion so very much. The participants' concern for the octopus also deeply moved me, and I failed to express that or to explore the wonderfully articulate question that you raise. I have been thinking a lot about octopuses as mirrors that lead us to learn about our own behaviors, and you're right to point my attention toward the value of learning from the experiences of these students and our attitudes toward captivity.

I share your hope for follow up support for La'Darion, and I'm going to write to MaST to see if I can learn more. Thank you again for this kind and thoughtful comment! I wish you all the best in your journey, and if you ever want to talk about it, or exchange other octopus thoughts, please feel free to e-mail me.

And yes, I will definitely share the panel video when it's up!

Reply Report Delete
Mike
Aug. 18, 2025, morning

I enjoyed the biological viewpoint on the life cycle of a software project! But it raises the question of exactly what it means for software to "reproduce". Since versions like "alpha" and "beta" apply to software projects rather than individual bits of code, I guess that "reproduction" here isn't about code-generating code or AI programming or anything like that. Instead we might say that a fork of a software project is asexual reproduction by fission, while maybe when a new project is inspired by features from existing ones that is a sort of sexual reproduction (with a variable number of "parents"). Is that what you had in mind?

On the other hand, if an "adult" software project means one that isn't changing any more, then that makes me think of how Donald Knuth decided that the version number of the TeX typesetting software is converging towards pi, with no new features added and every bug-fix release adding another decimal digit (currently at 3.141592653), and at his death the version number will become pi and all remaining bugs will become permanent "features". So perhaps after Knuth's death we will get a glimps of the elusive "adult software"?

Reply Report
The OctoPost
Aug. 19, 2025, morning

I wasn't aware of the TeX situtation; that is fascinating and indeed sounds like a promising candidate for a mature form. (My consultant informs me that there is also a "bug bounty" involved.)

As for the question of software reproduction, I admit I don't hold a strong view myself. It's entirely possible that software is exclusively parthenogenic; indeed, the accumulation over time of deleterious alleles or "bugs" might suggest it. On the other hand, cross-pollination (sometimes characterized as "IP theft") seems rampant in this ecosystem, which would support sexual reproduction.

As you may have noticed, I'm opting to take refuge in biobabble rather than commit to an exact science.

Reply Report Delete
Home
Powered by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.