Shipping a translation system means more than matching source and target sentences: you have to know whether it keeps media bias intact, follows style and terminology instructions, and only spends retrieval budget when external evidence actually helps. The papers here look at those problems from different angles, from an exploratory study of English→Bulgarian and German→Bulgarian bias transfer, to WMT 2026 work on instruction-specialized translation with quality-aware training and on-policy distillation, to selective retrieval for LLM translation under a partial-evidence regime.

Does Machine Translation Retain Media Bias?

MT can drop or add media bias, so bias-sensitive workflows need post-editing checks beyond literal adequacy, especially for affective wording and news content.

Within the most recent two decades, machine translation (MT) has been advanced from a research area to a mature, deployed technology for prose text and most language pairs. However, language has different dimensions of meaning, and the alluded progress has primarily been demonstrated for propositional meaning. In this small exploratory study, we investigate whether one type of affective meaning, namely different types of linguistically expressed media bias, are retained under automatic translation for two language pairs, English and German as the source languages, and Bulgarian as the target language. We evaluate four state-of-the-art translation methods to answer the question whether and to what degree a loss of non-neutral language (specifically, 27 types of media bias) can occur as a result of applying MT. Our empirical findings are consistent with the claim that MT does not fully retain existing news bias of its input source text, but also may add extra bias of its own. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study of MT media bias retention.

Qwen-MT-Lumen at WMT2026: Instruction-Specialized Translation via Quality-Aware Training and On-Policy Distillation

For instruction-specialized MT, the useful levers are continued pre-training, online preference optimization with direct-assessment judges, and on-policy distillation to preserve terminology, style, and format constraints.

We present Lumen, The open-source model is available at, our submission to the WMT 2026 General Machine Translation Shared Task. We focus on instruction-specialized translation, where systems must produce accurate translations while satisfying fine-grained requirements on style, terminology, and structured output. Lumen follows a four-stage pipeline. First, continued pre-training and supervised fine-tuning jointly strengthen multilingual translation competence and the ability to follow translation-specific instructions, such as terminology, style, and format constraints. Second, we extend the originally offline M^2PO preference-optimization framework into an online preference-optimization stage: the current policy samples candidate translations, an LLM judge assigns continuous direct-assessment scores, and the resulting multi-pair preferences are used to update the model. Third, on-policy distillation transfers stronger translation-instruction-following behavior from a larger teacher model to the Qwen3-14B student, improving translation-instruction adherence while retaining a 14B primary translation backbone. Finally, structure-aware inference and postprocessing preserve required formats, while selective repair addresses clear structural or decoding failures before submission. We participate in 23 translation directions. Under an absolute 1--5 LLM-judge rubric that evaluates translation-instruction following and translation quality separately, Lumen reaches an overall mean score of 4.60. Despite using a 14B translation backbone, it achieves performance comparable to leading proprietary systems in both translation quality and translation-instruction following.

Retrieve What Helps, Only When It Helps: Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Selective Retrieval-Augmented Machine Translation

Selective retrieval helps most when the system learns when to retrieve and what to retrieve, rather than querying external evidence for every input, and retriever training should target translation quality, not similarity.

Retrieving external knowledge can improve large language model (LLM) translation by providing supplementary information such as idiom interpretations and terminology. However, existing retrieval-augmented machine translation systems typically apply predefined retrieval strategies uniformly across all inputs. We argue that translation operates in a partial-evidence regime: LLM's parametric knowledge suffices for many inputs, while external evidence benefits a subset and usually supports rather than directly provides the desired translation. This creates two challenges: deciding when to retrieve and what evidence to acquire. We introduce Selective Retrieval-Augmented Translation (SRAT), an agentic reinforcement learning framework that learns when to translate directly or retrieve, what to retrieve, and how to integrate these decisions by optimizing final translation quality. To align evidence retrieval with downstream translation quality rather than simple semantic similarity, we further develop joint Plackett--Luce optimization and translation-quality contrastive training for retriever-training. Experiments on idiom, knowledge-intensive, and document-level translation with offline or online retrieval show that SRAT consistently outperforms never- and always-retrieve baselines, and quality-aligned retriever training provides further gains when similarity-based retrieval is insufficient. The results demonstrate the benefit of treating retrieval as a learnable translation action rather than fixed preprocessing.

Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility

Sparse autoencoders are promising for probing multilingual LLM internals, but the survey warns that recoverability, interpretability, and utility are still strongly shaped by design choices and evaluation pipelines.

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising approach to mechanistic interpretability by decomposing language-model activations into sparse, potentially interpretable features. However, differences in design assumptions, evaluation objectives, and experimental settings complicate conclusions about their effectiveness. We present a critical survey of 138 studies on SAEs in natural language processing. Our contributions are fourfold: (1) we propose a task-grounded taxonomy connecting dictionary design, feature operations, and NLP functions; (2) we examine how sparsity allocation, geometry, data coverage, and inference affect feature recoverability; (3) we assess evidence for semantic interpretability, mechanistic faithfulness, and behavioral utility; and (4) we synthesize findings across multilingual processing, retrieval, reasoning, classification, and behavioral regulation, highlighting the roles of objectives, baselines, supervision, and intervention pipelines. Through comparative analyses of published results, we reconcile apparent disagreements, identify unresolved questions, and propose directions for more rigorous evaluation. An anonymous research register https://anonymous.4open.science/r/sae-research-register-C331/register.html accompanies the survey.

Latent Compaction with Test-Time Training

Latent Compaction uses test-time training to shrink KV caches by up to 32x while keeping retrieval accuracy high, so it is relevant for long-context MT or localization workflows constrained by memory.

Long contexts enlarge key--value (KV) caches, increasing memory use and attention costs during generation. Compressing these caches must preserve information for unseen questions. We introduce Latent Compaction, which learns a compact document-specific cache through test-time training. We initialize cache entries using reconstruction importance, teacher attention, and key-space diversity. Training first fits attention outputs and log-normalizers to those of the full cache, with reconstruction-selected entries held fixed. It then jointly optimizes the entire cache through end-to-end distillation from the full-cache model. Model weights remain frozen throughout, and training uses only generic prompts about the document, without access to downstream questions or answers. Experiments on RULER, LongBench, and Phonebook Lookup demonstrate substantial gains over budget-matched compression baselines. On a RULER, for example, our method achieves 96.7% accuracy at 32x compression, compared with 40.0% for KVZip+. The method also transfers across model scales and families, with retrieval gains on both Qwen3 and MiniCPM5. These results show that treating the KV cache as a neural network and optimizing it with test-time training can preserve retrieval accuracy under aggressive compression. The code is released at https://www.github.com/THUNLP/latent-compaction

Papers announced by arXiv on Wednesday, 14 October 2026, covering submissions from 13 October to 14 October 2026.