Here is today's selection of cs.CL papers exploring advancements in human-AI collaboration and reasoning in language models. The common theme revolves around enhancing reasoning and translation capabilities, focusing on improving human-AI co-annotation, scalable model libraries, and addressing dialectal biases in language processing.

ReasonScaffold: A Scaffolded Reasoning-based Annotation Protocol for Human-AI Co-Annotation

Human annotation is central to NLP evaluation, yet subjective tasks often exhibit substantial variability across annotators. While large language models (LLMs) can provide structured reasoning to support annotation, their influence on human annotation behavior remains underexplored. We introduce \textbf{ReasonScaffold}, a scaffolded reasoning annotation protocol that exposes LLM-generated explanations while withholding predicted labels. We study how reasoning affects human annotation behavior in a controlled setting, rather than evaluating annotation accuracy. Using a two-pass protocol inspired by Delphi-style revision, annotators first label instances independently and then revise their decisions after viewing model-generated reasoning. We evaluate the approach on sentiment classification and opinion detection tasks, analyzing changes in inter-annotator agreement and revision behavior. To quantify these effects, we introduce the Annotator Effort Proxy (AEP), a metric capturing the proportion of labels revised after exposure to reasoning. Our results show that exposure to reasoning is associated with increased agreement, along with minimal revision, suggesting that reasoning helps resolve ambiguous cases without inducing widespread changes. These findings provide insight into how reasoning explanations shape annotation consistency and highlight reasoning-based scaffolds as a practical mechanism for human--AI co-annotation workflows.

CLT-Forge: A Scalable Library for Cross-Layer Transcoders and Attribution Graphs

Mechanistic interpretability seeks to understand how Large Language Models (LLMs) represent and process information. Recent approaches based on dictionary learning and transcoders enable representing model computation in terms of sparse, interpretable features and their interactions, giving rise to feature attribution graphs. However, these graphs are often large and redundant, limiting their interpretability in practice. Cross-Layer Transcoders (CLTs) address this issue by sharing features across layers while preserving layer-specific decoding, yielding more compact representations, but remain difficult to train and analyze at scale. We introduce an open-source library for end-to-end training and interpretability of CLTs. Our framework integrates scalable distributed training with model sharding and compressed activation caching, a unified automated interpretability pipeline for feature analysis and explanation, attribution graph computation using Circuit-Tracer, and a flexible visualization interface. This provides a practical and unified solution for scaling CLT-based mechanistic interpretability. Our code is available at: https://github.com/LLM-Interp/CLT-Forge.

Reading Between the Lines: How Electronic Nonverbal Cues shape Emotion Decoding

As text-based computer-mediated communication (CMC) increasingly structures everyday interaction, a central question re-emerges with new urgency: How do users reconstruct nonverbal expression in environments where embodied cues are absent? This paper provides a systematic, theory-driven account of electronic nonverbal cues (eNVCs) - textual analogues of kinesics, vocalics, and paralinguistics - in public microblog communication. Across three complementary studies, we advance conceptual, empirical, and methodological contributions. Study 1 develops a unified taxonomy of eNVCs grounded in foundational nonverbal communication theory and introduces a scalable Python toolkit for their automated detection. Study 2, a within-subject survey experiment, offers controlled causal evidence that eNVCs substantially improve emotional decoding accuracy and lower perceived ambiguity, while also identifying boundary conditions, such as sarcasm, under which these benefits weaken or disappear. Study 3, through focus group discussions, reveals the interpretive strategies users employ when reasoning about digital prosody, including drawing meaning from the absence of expected cues and defaulting toward negative interpretations in ambiguous contexts. Together, these studies establish eNVCs as a coherent and measurable class of digital behaviors, refine theoretical accounts of cue richness and interpretive effort, and provide practical tools for affective computing, user modeling, and emotion-aware interface design. The eNVC detection toolkit is available as a Python and R package at https://github.com/kokiljaidka/envc.

Enhancing reasoning accuracy in large language models during inference time

Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit strong linguistic abilities while remaining unreliable on multi-step reasoning tasks, particularly when deployed without additional training or fine-tuning. In this work, we study inference-time techniques to improve the reasoning accuracy of LLMs. We systematically evaluate three classes of inference-time strategies: (i) self-consistency via stochastic decoding, where the model is sampled multiple times using controlled temperature and nucleus sampling and the most frequent final answer is selected; (ii) dual-model reasoning agreement, where outputs from two independent models are compared and only consistent reasoning traces are trusted; and (iii) self-reflection, where the model critiques and revises its own reasoning. Across all evaluated methods, we employ Chain-of-Thought (CoT) [1] prompting to elicit explicit intermediate reasoning steps before generating final answers. In this work, we provide a controlled comparative evaluation across three inference-time strategies under identical prompting and verification settings. Our experiments on LLM [2] show that self-consistency with nucleus sampling and controlled temperature value yields the substantial gains, achieving a 9% to 15% absolute improvement in accuracy over greedy single-pass decoding, well-suited for low-risk domains, offering meaningful gains with minimal overhead. The dual-model approach provides additional confirmation for model reasoning steps thus more appropriate for moderate-risk domains, where higher reliability justifies additional compute. Self-reflection offers only marginal improvements, suggesting limited effectiveness for smaller non-reasoning models at inference time.

Benchmarking Bengali Dialectal Bias: A Multi-Stage Framework Integrating RAG-Based Translation and Human-Augmented RLAIF

Large language models (LLMs) frequently exhibit performance biases against regional dialects of low-resource languages. However, frameworks to quantify these disparities remain scarce. We propose a two-phase framework to evaluate dialectal bias in LLM question-answering across nine Bengali dialects. First, we translate and gold-label standard Bengali questions into dialectal variants adopting a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline to prepare 4,000 question sets. Since traditional translation quality evaluation metrics fail on unstandardized dialects, we evaluate fidelity using an LLM-as-a-judge, which human correlation confirms outperforms legacy metrics. Second, we benchmark 19 LLMs across these gold-labeled sets, running 68,395 RLAIF evaluations validated through multi-judge agreement and human fallback. Our findings reveal severe performance drops linked to linguistic divergence. For instance, responses to the highly divergent Chittagong dialect score 5.44/10, compared to 7.68/10 for Tangail. Furthermore, increased model scale does not consistently mitigate this bias. We contribute a validated translation quality evaluation method, a rigorous benchmark dataset, and a Critical Bias Sensitivity (CBS) metric for safety-critical applications.