Here is today's selection of cs.CL papers focusing on advancements in machine translation and language processing. The papers explore innovative approaches to enhance cross-lingual alignment, optimize language models for low-resource languages, and improve the detection of AI-generated content. Additionally, they address challenges in dealing with noisy text data and propose adaptive routing methods for large language models.

Automatic detection of Gen-AI texts: A comparative framework of neural models

The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models has significantly increased the difficulty of distinguishing between human-written and AI generated texts, raising critical issues across academic, editorial, and social domains. This paper investigates the problem of AI generated text detection through the design, implementation, and comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning based detectors. Four neural architectures are developed and analyzed: a Multilayer Perceptron, a one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network, a MobileNet-based CNN, and a Transformer model. The proposed models are benchmarked against widely used online detectors, including ZeroGPT, GPTZero, QuillBot, Originality.AI, Sapling, IsGen, Rephrase, and Writer. Experiments are conducted on the COLING Multilingual Dataset, considering both English and Italian configurations, as well as on an original thematic dataset focused on Art and Mental Health. Results show that supervised detectors achieve more stable and robust performance than commercial tools across different languages and domains, highlighting key strengths and limitations of current detection strategies.

Why Better Cross-Lingual Alignment Fails for Better Cross-Lingual Transfer: Case of Encoders

Better cross-lingual alignment is often assumed to yield better cross-lingual transfer. However, explicit alignment techniques -- despite increasing embedding similarity -- frequently fail to improve token-level downstream performance. In this work, we show that this mismatch arises because alignment and downstream task objectives are largely orthogonal, and because the downstream benefits from alignment vary substantially across languages and task types. We analyze four XLM-R encoder models aligned on different language pairs and fine-tuned for either POS Tagging or Sentence Classification. Using representational analyses, including embedding distances, gradient similarities, and gradient magnitudes for both task and alignment losses, we find that: (1) embedding distances alone are unreliable predictors of improvements (or degradations) in task performance and (2) alignment and task gradients are often close to orthogonal, indicating that optimizing one objective may contribute little to optimizing the other. Taken together, our findings explain why better'' alignment often fails to translate intobetter'' cross-lingual transfer. Based on these insights, we provide practical guidelines for combining cross-lingual alignment with task-specific fine-tuning, highlighting the importance of careful loss selection.

VEPO: Variable Entropy Policy Optimization for Low-Resource Language Foundation Models

Large language models frequently exhibit suboptimal performance on low resource languages, primarily due to inefficient subword segmentation and systemic training data imbalances. In this paper, we propose Variable Entropy Policy Optimization (VEPO), which leverages Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards to incorporate deterministic structural constraints into the policy alignment process. This framework ensures prescribed sequence length, robust format consistency, and rigorous linguistic well formedness, all enforced during training. Central to our approach is a variable entropy mechanism that enables the model to dynamically calibrate the equilibrium between literal fidelity and semantic naturalness by modulating the exploration exploitation manifold. By integrating entropy tempered advantage estimation with asymmetric clipping, VEPO sustains robust exploration while mitigating policy collapse. Empirical evaluations across 90 FLORES-200, COMET-22, chrF directions demonstrate that VEPO yields substantial improvements in both tokenization efficiency and translation quality, bridging the performance gap for underrepresented languages.

TARo: Token-level Adaptive Routing for LLM Test-time Alignment

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities but typically require expensive post-training to reach high performance. Recent test-time alignment methods offer a lightweight alternative, but have been explored mainly for preference alignment rather than reasoning. To bridge this gap, we propose, Token-level Adaptive Routing (TARo), which steers frozen LLMs toward structured reasoning entirely at inference time. Specifically, we first train reward models on step-wise mathematical traces to capture fine-grained logical consistency signals, then introduce a learnable token-level router that automatically controls the guidance of the reward model to the base model. Extensive experiments show that TARo significantly improves reasoning performance by up to +22.4% over base model and +8.4% over existing token-level test-time alignment methods, while also boosting out-of-distribution clinical reasoning (MedXpertQA) and instruction following (AlpacaEval). Furthermore, TARo also generalizes from small to large backbones without retraining, extending test-time alignment from preference optimization to robust, cross-domain reasoning.

Detecting Basic Values in A Noisy Russian Social Media Text Data: A Multi-Stage Classification Framework

This study presents a multi-stage classification framework for detecting human values in noisy Russian language social media, validated on a random sample of 7.5 million public text posts. Drawing on Schwartz's theory of basic human values, we design a multi-stage pipeline that includes spam and nonpersonal content filtering, targeted selection of value relevant and politically relevant posts, LLM based annotation, and multi-label classification. Particular attention is given to verifying the quality of LLM annotations and model predictions against human experts. We treat human expert annotations not as ground truth but as an interpretative benchmark with its own uncertainty. To account for annotation subjectivity, we aggregate multiple LLM generated judgments into soft labels that reflect varying levels of agreement. These labels are then used to train transformer based models capable of predicting the probability of each of the ten basic values. The best performing model, XLM RoBERTa large, achieves an F1 macro of 0.83 and an F1 of 0.71 on held out test data. By treating value detection as a multi perspective interpretive task, where expert labels, GPT annotations, and model predictions represent coherent but not identical readings of the same texts, we show that the model generally aligns with human judgments but systematically overestimates the Openness to Change value domain. Empirically, the study reveals distinct patterns of value expression and their co-occurrence in Russian social networks, contributing to a broader research agenda on cultural variation, communicative framing, and value based interpretation in digital environments. All models are released publicly.