Here is today's selection of cs.CL papers exploring advancements in machine translation and related technologies. The papers focus on improving cultural and gender understanding in MT, alongside frameworks for evaluating AI-generated content and MT systems.

From Words to Worlds: Benchmarking Cross-Cultural Cultural Understanding in Machine Translation

Culture-expressions, such as idioms, slang, and culture-specific items (CSIs), are pervasive in natural language and encode meanings that go beyond literal linguistic form. Accurately translating such expressions remains challenging for machine translation systems. Despite this, existing benchmarks remain fragmented and do not provide a systematic framework for evaluating translation performance on culture-loaded expressions. To address this gap, we introduce CulT-Eval, a benchmark designed to evaluate how models handle different types of culturally grounded expressions. CulT-Eval comprises over 7,959 carefully curated instances spanning multiple types of culturally grounded expressions, with a comprehensive error taxonomy covering culturally grounded expressions. Through extensive evaluation of large language models and detailed analysis, we identify recurring and systematic failure modes that are not adequately captured by existing automatic metrics. Accordingly, we propose a complementary evaluation metric that targets culturally induced meaning deviations overlooked by standard MT metrics. The results indicate that current models struggle to preserve culturally grounded meaning and to capture the cultural and contextual nuances essential for accurate translation. Our benchmark and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CulT-Eval-E75D/.

From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation

Large language models (LLMs) are currently applied to scientific paper evaluation by assigning an absolute score to each paper independently. However, since score scales vary across conferences, time periods, and evaluation criteria, models trained on absolute scores are prone to fitting narrow, context-specific rules rather than developing robust scholarly judgment. To overcome this limitation, we propose shifting paper evaluation from isolated scoring to collaborative ranking. In particular, we design \textbf{C}omparison-\textbf{N}ative framework for \textbf{P}aper \textbf{E}valuation (\textbf{CNPE}), integrating comparison into both data construction and model learning. We first propose a graph-based similarity ranking algorithm to facilitate the sampling of more informative and discriminative paper pairs from a collection. We then enhance relative quality judgment through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with comparison-based rewards. At inference, the model performs pairwise comparisons over sampled paper pairs and aggregates these preference signals into a global relative quality ranking. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves an average relative improvement of \textbf{21.8\%} over the strong baseline DeepReview-14B, while exhibiting robust generalization to five previously unseen datasets. \href{https://github.com/ECNU-Text-Computing/ComparisonReview}{Code}.

ConGA: Guidelines for Contextual Gender Annotation. A Framework for Annotating Gender in Machine Translation

Handling gender across languages remains a persistent challenge for Machine Translation (MT) and Large Language Models (LLMs), especially when translating from gender-neutral languages into morphologically gendered ones, such as English to Italian. English largely omits grammatical gender, while Italian requires explicit agreement across multiple grammatical categories. This asymmetry often leads MT systems to default to masculine forms, reinforcing bias and reducing translation accuracy. To address this issue, we present the Contextual Gender Annotation (ConGA) framework, a linguistically grounded set of guidelines for word-level gender annotation. The scheme distinguishes between semantic gender in English through three tags, Masculine (M), Feminine (F), and Ambiguous (A), and grammatical gender realisation in Italian (Masculine (M), Feminine (F)), combined with entity-level identifiers for cross-sentence tracking. We apply ConGA to the gENder-IT dataset, creating a gold-standard resource for evaluating gender bias in translation. Our results reveal systematic masculine overuse and inconsistent feminine realisation, highlighting persistent limitations of current MT systems. By combining fine-grained linguistic annotation with quantitative evaluation, this work offers both a methodology and a benchmark for building more gender-aware and multilingual NLP systems.

Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions

The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has created an urgent need for robust and generalizable detectors of machine-generated text. Existing benchmarks typically evaluate a single detector on a single dataset under ideal conditions, leaving open questions about cross-domain transfer, cross-LLM generalization, and adversarial robustness. We present a comprehensive benchmark evaluating diverse detection approaches across two corpora: HC3 (23,363 human-ChatGPT pairs) and ELI5 (15,000 human-Mistral-7B pairs). Methods include classical classifiers, fine-tuned transformer encoders (BERT, RoBERTa, ELECTRA, DistilBERT, DeBERTa-v3), a CNN, an XGBoost stylometric model, perplexity-based detectors, and LLM-as-detector prompting. Results show that transformer models achieve near-perfect in-distribution performance but degrade under domain shift. The XGBoost stylometric model matches performance while remaining interpretable. LLM-based detectors underperform and are affected by generator-detector identity bias. Perplexity-based methods exhibit polarity inversion, with modern LLM outputs showing lower perplexity than human text, but remain effective when corrected. No method generalizes robustly across domains and LLM sources.

Gender Disambiguation in Machine Translation: Diagnostic Evaluation in Decoder-Only Architectures

While Large Language Models achieve state-of-the-art results across a wide range of NLP tasks, they remain prone to systematic biases. Among these, gender bias is particularly salient in MT, due to systematic differences across languages in whether and how gender is marked. As a result, translation often requires disambiguating implicit source signals into explicit gender-marked forms. In this context, standard benchmarks may capture broad disparities but fail to reflect the full complexity of gender bias in modern MT. In this paper, we extend recent frameworks on bias evaluation by: (i) introducing a novel measure coined "Prior Bias", capturing a model's default gender assumptions, and (ii) applying the framework to decoder-only MT models. Our results show that, despite their scale and state-of-the-art status, decoder-only models do not generally outperform encoder-decoder architectures on gender-specific metrics; however, post-training (e.g., instruction tuning) not only improves contextual awareness but also reduces the masculine Prior Bias.