Here is today's selection of cs.CL papers exploring advancements in machine translation and related fields. A common theme is the enhancement of model efficiency and evaluation methodologies, as seen in discussions on parameter-efficient quality estimation and innovative evaluation techniques for personalized dialogue systems. Additionally, insights into maintaining learned knowledge during fine-tuning and AI's evolving capabilities in specialized domains, such as scientific preference learning, highlight the ongoing progress in AI's adaptability and reasoning skills.

Parameter-Efficient Quality Estimation via Frozen Recursive Models

Tiny Recursive Models (TRM) achieve strong results on reasoning tasks through iterative refinement of a shared network. We investigate whether these recursive mechanisms transfer to Quality Estimation (QE) for low-resource languages using a three-phase methodology. Experiments on $8$ language pairs on a low-resource QE dataset reveal three findings. First, TRM's recursive mechanisms do not transfer to QE. External iteration hurts performance, and internal recursion offers only narrow benefits. Next, representation quality dominates architectural choices, and lastly, frozen pretrained embeddings match fine-tuned performance while reducing trainable parameters by 37$\times$ (7M vs 262M). TRM-QE with frozen XLM-R embeddings achieves a Spearman's correlation of 0.370, matching fine-tuned variants (0.369) and outperforming an equivalent-depth standard transformer (0.336). On Hindi and Tamil, frozen TRM-QE outperforms MonoTransQuest (560M parameters) with 80$\times$ fewer trainable parameters, suggesting that weight sharing combined with frozen embeddings enables parameter efficiency for QE. We release the code publicly for further research. Code is available at https://github.com/surrey-nlp/TRMQE.

Rethinking Evaluation in Retrieval-Augmented Personalized Dialogue: A Cognitive and Linguistic Perspective

In cognitive science and linguistic theory, dialogue is not seen as a chain of independent utterances but rather as a joint activity sustained by coherence, consistency, and shared understanding. However, many systems for open-domain and personalized dialogue use surface-level similarity metrics (e.g., BLEU, ROUGE, F1) as one of their main reporting measures, which fail to capture these deeper aspects of conversational quality. We re-examine a notable retrieval-augmented framework for personalized dialogue, LAPDOG, as a case study for evaluation methodology. Using both human and LLM-based judges, we identify limitations in current evaluation practices, including corrupted dialogue histories, contradictions between retrieved stories and persona, and incoherent response generation. Our results show that human and LLM judgments align closely but diverge from lexical similarity metrics, underscoring the need for cognitively grounded evaluation methods. Broadly, this work charts a path toward more reliable assessment frameworks for retrieval-augmented dialogue systems that better reflect the principles of natural human communication.

ECG-Reasoning-Benchmark: A Benchmark for Evaluating Clinical Reasoning Capabilities in ECG Interpretation

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show promising performance in automated electrocardiogram interpretation, it remains unclear whether they genuinely perform actual step-by-step reasoning or just rely on superficial visual cues. To investigate this, we introduce \textbf{ECG-Reasoning-Benchmark}, a novel multi-turn evaluation framework comprising over 6,400 samples to systematically assess step-by-step reasoning across 17 core ECG diagnoses. Our comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals a critical failure in executing multi-step logical deduction. Although models possess the medical knowledge to retrieve clinical criteria for a diagnosis, they exhibit near-zero success rates (6% Completion) in maintaining a complete reasoning chain, primarily failing to ground the corresponding ECG findings to the actual visual evidence in the ECG signal. These results demonstrate that current MLLMs bypass actual visual interpretation, exposing a critical flaw in existing training paradigms and underscoring the necessity for robust, reasoning-centric medical AI. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Jwoo5/ecg-reasoning-benchmark.

Fine-tuning MLLMs Without Forgetting Is Easier Than You Think

The paper demonstrate that simple adjustments of the fine-tuning recipes of multimodal large language models (MLLM) are sufficient to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. On visual question answering, we design a 2x2 experimental framework to assess model performance across in-distribution and out-of-distribution image and text inputs. Our results show that appropriate regularization, such as constraining the number of trainable parameters or adopting a low learning rate, effectively prevents forgetting when dealing with out-of-distribution images. However, we uncover a distinct form of forgetting in settings with in-distribution images and out-of-distribution text. We attribute this forgetting as task-specific overfitting and address this issue by introducing a data-hybrid training strategy that combines datasets and tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that this approach naturally extends to continual learning, outperforming existing methods with complex auxiliary mechanisms. In general, our findings challenge the prevailing assumptions by highlighting the inherent robustness of MLLMs and providing practical guidelines for adapting them while preserving their general capabilities.

AI Can Learn Scientific Taste

Great scientists have strong judgement and foresight, closely tied to what we call scientific taste. Here, we use the term to refer to the capacity to judge and propose research ideas with high potential impact. However, most relative research focuses on improving an AI scientist's executive capability, while enhancing an AI's scientific taste remains underexplored. In this work, we propose Reinforcement Learning from Community Feedback (RLCF), a training paradigm that uses large-scale community signals as supervision, and formulate scientific taste learning as a preference modeling and alignment problem. For preference modeling, we train Scientific Judge on 700K field- and time-matched pairs of high- vs. low-citation papers to judge ideas. For preference alignment, using Scientific Judge as a reward model, we train a policy model, Scientific Thinker, to propose research ideas with high potential impact. Experiments show Scientific Judge outperforms SOTA LLMs (e.g., GPT-5.2, Gemini 3 Pro) and generalizes to future-year test, unseen fields, and peer-review preference. Furthermore, Scientific Thinker proposes research ideas with higher potential impact than baselines. Our findings show that AI can learn scientific taste, marking a key step toward reaching human-level AI scientists.