Machine Translation Digest for Jul 11 2025
Here is today's selection of cs.CL papers in the field of machine translation and multilingual processing. The common themes revolve around improving machine translation through novel evaluation metrics, advancing multilingual speech recognition, and enhancing the understanding and application of complex regulations by language models. These studies highlight the ongoing efforts to refine language model capabilities across diverse multilingual and domain-specific contexts.
Improving MLLM's Document Image Machine Translation via Synchronously Self-reviewing Its OCR Proficiency
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong performance in document image tasks, especially Optical Character Recognition (OCR). However, they struggle with Document Image Machine Translation (DIMT), which requires handling both cross-modal and cross-lingual challenges. Previous efforts to enhance DIMT capability through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on the DIMT dataset often result in the forgetting of the model's existing monolingual abilities, such as OCR. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel fine-tuning paradigm, named Synchronously Self-Reviewing (SSR) its OCR proficiency, inspired by the concept "Bilingual Cognitive Advantage". Specifically, SSR prompts the model to generate OCR text before producing translation text, which allows the model to leverage its strong monolingual OCR ability while learning to translate text across languages. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the proposed SSR learning helps mitigate catastrophic forgetting, improving the generalization ability of MLLMs on both OCR and DIMT tasks.
Evaluating LLMs in Medicine: A Call for Rigor, Transparency
Objectives: To evaluate the current limitations of large language models (LLMs) in medical question answering, focusing on the quality of datasets used for their evaluation. Materials and Methods: Widely-used benchmark datasets, including MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and MMLU, were reviewed for their rigor, transparency, and relevance to clinical scenarios. Alternatives, such as challenge questions in medical journals, were also analyzed to identify their potential as unbiased evaluation tools. Results: Most existing datasets lack clinical realism, transparency, and robust validation processes. Publicly available challenge questions offer some benefits but are limited by their small size, narrow scope, and exposure to LLM training. These gaps highlight the need for secure, comprehensive, and representative datasets. Conclusion: A standardized framework is critical for evaluating LLMs in medicine. Collaborative efforts among institutions and policymakers are needed to ensure datasets and methodologies are rigorous, unbiased, and reflective of clinical complexities.
Beyond N-Grams: Rethinking Evaluation Metrics and Strategies for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization
Automatic n-gram based metrics such as ROUGE are widely used for evaluating generative tasks such as summarization. While these metrics are considered indicative (even if imperfect) of human evaluation for English, their suitability for other languages remains unclear. To address this, we systematically assess evaluation metrics for generation both n-gram-based and neural based to evaluate their effectiveness across languages and tasks. Specifically, we design a large-scale evaluation suite across eight languages from four typological families: agglutinative, isolating, low-fusional, and high-fusional, spanning both low- and high-resource settings, to analyze their correlation with human judgments. Our findings highlight the sensitivity of evaluation metrics to the language type. For example, in fusional languages, n-gram-based metrics show lower correlation with human assessments compared to isolating and agglutinative languages. We also demonstrate that proper tokenization can significantly mitigate this issue for morphologically rich fusional languages, sometimes even reversing negative trends. Additionally, we show that neural-based metrics specifically trained for evaluation, such as COMET, consistently outperform other neural metrics and better correlate with human judgments in low-resource languages. Overall, our analysis highlights the limitations of n-gram metrics for fusional languages and advocates for greater investment in neural-based metrics trained for evaluation tasks.
ILT-Iterative LoRA Training through Focus-Feedback-Fix for Multilingual Speech Recognition
The deep integration of large language models and automatic speech recognition systems has become a promising research direction with high practical value. To address the overfitting issue commonly observed in Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) during the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage, this work proposes an innovative training paradigm Iterative LoRA Training (ILT) in combination with an Iterative Pseudo Labeling strategy, effectively enhancing the theoretical upper bound of model performance. Based on Whisper-large-v3 and Qwen2-Audio, we conduct systematic experiments using a three-stage training process: Focus Training, Feed Back Training, and Fix Training. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Furthermore, the MegaAIS research team applied this technique in the Interspeech 2025 Multilingual Conversational Speech Language Modeling Challenge (MLC-SLM), achieving 4th in Track 1 (Multilingual ASR Task) and 1st place in Track 2 (Speech Separation and Recognition Task), showcasing the practical feasibility and strong application potential of our approach.
Can Large Language Models Understand As Well As Apply Patent Regulations to Pass a Hands-On Patent Attorney Test?
The legal field already uses various large language models (LLMs) in actual applications, but their quantitative performance and reasons for it are underexplored. We evaluated several open-source and proprietary LLMs -- including GPT-series, Anthropic, Deepseek and Llama-3, variants -- on parts of the European Qualifying Examination (EQE) for future European Patent Attorneys. OpenAI o1 led with 0.82 accuracy and 0.81 F1 score, whereas (Amazon Web Services) AWS Llama 3.1 8B lagged at 0.50 accuracy, and a Python-deployed Llama 3.1 8B scored 0.55. The latter two are within the range of mere guessing for the two-answer forced-choice design. None of the evaluated models could have passed the examination fully, as accuracy never exceeded the average threshold of 0.90 required for professional-level standards -- also not models that are regularly promoted for their assumed beyond-PhD- and bar-admitted-lawyer-level performance. GPT-4o excelled at integrating text and graphics, while Claude 3 Opus often lost formatting coherence. Human patent experts evaluated the textual justifications and uncovered various critical shortcomings of each model. They valued clarity and legal rationale over the raw correctness of the answers, which revealed misalignment between automatic metrics and expert judgment. Model outputs were sensitive to modest temperature changes and prompt wording, which underscores the remaining necessity of expert oversight. Future work should target logical consistency, robust multimodality, and adaptive prompting to approach human-level patent proficiency. In summary, despite the outstanding performance of recent large models, the general public might overestimate their performance. The field has a long way to go to develop a virtual patent attorney. This paper wants to point out several specific limitations that need solutions.
| Curated by yukajii.com |