TildAlice Dev Weekly logo

TildAlice Dev Weekly

Archives
Log in
Subscribe
May 10, 2026

SciPy FFT vs NumPy FFT: 2.3x Speed Gap at 50kHz

NumPy FFT ran 2.3x slower than SciPy on 50kHz bearing data. Here's the benchmark, the gotchas, and a one-line fix for your vibration pipeline.

Read the full article: SciPy FFT vs NumPy FFT: 2.3x Speed Gap at 50kHz


You're receiving this because you subscribed to TildAlice newsletter. | #scipy-fft, #numpy-fft, #vibration-analysis, #bearing-fault-detection, #phm

Don't miss what's next. Subscribe to TildAlice Dev Weekly:
← Newer RoPE vs ALiBi: 32K Context LLaMA Perplexity Beats MPT Older → Python list vs tuple vs set: Read/Write Speed Benchmark
tildalice.io
GitHub
Powered by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.