There are a number of themes I've been circling with the current iteration of this newsletter: reading communities, book reviews, the future of bookstores, modes of engaging with books, my own reading practice.
One area I've been trying to figure out how to write about more concerns books and quality, judgment, ratings, canonicity — dancing around the constellation of things that make a book a good book; that identify a book as one of the best books.
From the start, trying to make a list of "best" books is fraught: best to whom? Best by what metrics? Best for a particular context, or best — as best we can decide, so far — for all time?
Antilibraries is in large part about reckoning with these questions, about exploring where specific books live in the matrix of might/should/could-readability, as well as about wrestling with the meta-level conundrums of curation and classification and value.