*Chanting* TRAINS! TRAINS! TRAINS! TRAINS! It’s been far too long, but it’s finally here. The one about trains. Gonna try and keep things as brief as possible outside of this week’s topic because the next edition’s gonna be a big one.
As a thoroughbred Torontonian, I’m thoroughly familiar with Toronto’s public transit system, run by the Toronto Transit Commission, or TTC for short. It’s what I would use to go to and from both high school and almost all of university, and it’s what anyone who actually wants to go to downtown Toronto in a timely manner ends up using.
I’ve got a lot of fond memories from my time Riding the Rocket (the official motto of the TTC, I kid you not), from being called a “Popcorn Pimp” by a crackhead on the bus in ninth grade, to having to walk 3km to school because the bus drivers on the route that went to my school all decided not to come that day, to being packed like sardines on a subway platform (to the point where people were leaning right off the edge of the platform) because the previous train went out of commission, dropping all its passengers at a packed subway station downtown. In other words, a fantastic transit system. But 2017 brought a huge surprise as the TTC was named the #1 Transit System of the Year in all of North America by the American Public Transportation Association.
I was shook. To quote Future in his seminal, prescient masterpiece “Mask Off”: Ain’t no way, ain’t no fuckin’ way. There was no way that a transit system which had buses and trains breaking down on a daily basis could possibly be the best transit system in not only Canada, but Canada and the United States.
But then I looked at the competition.
It only really settled in when talking to a friend around two years later. He was an Ottawan staying in Toronto for the duration of our internship, which meant taking the TTC daily to get to work. He exclaimed to me how much better Toronto’s transit system was than Ottawa’s, a large part of which had to do with the former’s reach. For reference, here’s OCTranspo’s (Ottawa’s transit system) coverage:
Note: These are LRT lines, not Subway lines.
And here’s the TTC’s coverage:
Note: The Blue line is Scarborough’s rickety old LRT, which has been using the same train cars that it used when it opened 36 years ago, and is to date the only part of the TTC which has remained without any expansion or update. I took it to work every day for four months in 2017.
Another Note: This map also doesn’t show the city’s streetcar system, which extends pretty broadly below the green line in that map. OCTranspo doesn’t have one.
It was only after that conversation that I began to seek out the horror stories about other transit systems in North America. It’s insane to think about how far behind the rest of the world North America has fallen when it comes to even just rail transit in general. Something like Japan or China’s high speed rail system would make going from Toronto to Montreal (not that I would want to set foot in Quebec on my own volition) far less of a drag than it currently is, yet more time is spent entertaining bonehead ideas like Musk’s death tunnels than towards actually making mobility easier for the public.
It’s gonna be interesting to see how Toronto’s upcoming Eglinton LRT system, a system that’s been under construction since I started high school 9 years ago, shifts transit even further when that does eventually open after the imminent collapse of civilization. Until then, I’ll be a bit more considerate when the bus driver notices me running after the bus and chooses to accelerate even faster.
The good news is that work on the Last Big Piece is winding down, so hopefully that first draft should be good for the end of next week. But as I was working on it this week, I kinda realized how much tougher it is for me to write something when I lack conviction or confidence in what I’m writing about. I know, shocking, right? I think with this piece, the further I went into the rabbit hole with research, the less confident about the point I was trying to make.
But the past week’s events (surrounding X-Factor #10) had me thinking more about the role of comics criticism, especially in online rhetoric, and the responsibility that writers and critics have when putting out a piece of work. I don’t know, I’m hoping that this piece will be a good note to go out on, but I’m more interested in what’s beyond it at this point.
Speaking of which, the next newsletter is going to go more into what that beyond is, and what that means for the state of the newsletter itself.
I’ve also been doing this thing called the “Half Year Dash”, where I watch at least a movie a day for the latter half of the year in an attempt to clear out my watchlists across various streaming platforms. I’ve got a script that throws a random movie at me every day for me to watch. Let’s see how long I keep with this.
The Half Year Dash:
More questions, more questions! Here’s one from anonymous reader #5:
Q: If you’re Disney or Discovery (I think that’s who runs DC), what are the pros & cons of putting effort into trilogies when these 6-8 episode mini-series on Disney+ are proving to be successful? Do you see this in a similar light to the discussion of how comics are collected?
A: It’s an interesting thing because the trilogy format has traditionally been a thing in movies. I didn’t really think about it before I compiled the list for the Half Year Dash, but there is a cleanliness to a trilogy, which just feels rooted in the fundamentals of logic. Jokes tend to land on the third beat, the rule of thirds dominates photography; there’s just something about threes that work so well.
However, trilogies and 6-8-episode “prestige” seasons aren’t the same. Even though three 90-minute movies and 6 45-minute episodes both equal 270 total minutes of content, the storytelling formats are wholly different. It’s the same as a 6-issue trade vs. an Original Graphic Novel. Breaking it up into smaller episodes means accounting for more start and endpoints, and sectioning the story off in a manner where each piece breaks off cleanly. Funny enough, my Next Big Thing will involve talking about this stuff, so uh, wait and see? I’ve already rambled way too much about this here.
I know I’ve been talking about The Next Big Thing and What Comes Beyond, and while it all sounds ominous (or like I’m some underground rapper at the foot of your bed saying, “Big things coming soon” over and over again), it’s mainly because actually prepping for these things has taken a while, and has raised questions faster than I can find answers for them.
But that changes with the next newsletter.
The next edition will be the Next Big Thing newsletter, pretty much detailing what I’ve got in the works for the foreseeable future, answer every question that I haven’t been able to answer yet (till then, submit them here, and talk about the future of this newsletter. It probably won’t be in two weeks, but it’ll be soon, once I’m ready to announce things. But until then, have yourselves a great weekend.