Draconic Lineage: A Contribution to Racial Science and Race Realism
Dragonsphere Report
It is striking that no one has yet seen fit to develop and disseminate a theory of the Draconic race. In fact, the average reader is probably unaware that there even is such a race. Therefore, it becomes my duty to attempt to fill this hole, even though I am barely a probationer and by no means the best figure for such a task. The significance of this project is simply too great to leave entirely untouched, and in even the course of my own meager investigation, it will become apparent that all of history is cast into sharp relief and put into a condition of perfect clarity once a theory of the Draconic race is introduced.
We must begin by looking for the origin of dragons. The Epic of Gilgamesh features the dragon Humbaba, and is one of the candidates for earliest depiction of a dragon. Conversely, some sources put the emergence of dragon symbolism in ancient China as having occurred at around the same time, if not much earlier. It seems reasonable enough to assert on the basis of this and other evidence that the dragon came to public awareness independently in the east and the west. The divergent physical forms depicted in these two different types of dragons, as well as their different attitudes and presentation, needs to be accounted for. To a certain extent, the latter is explained away easily simply by the rise of Christianity as a defamatory power (and more on this later). However, this explanation is incomplete, as evil dragons exist not just in Mesopotamian folklore, such as with Tiamat, but in eastern folklore as well, such as the eight headed dragon of chaos in the Kojiki. While exceptions exist in both east and west, the general ratio of good to evil is roughly inverted across the divide.
What is clear, however, and attested to by the comparative mythologies of many unique and independent people across the span of space and time, is that at a certain point, dragons began interbreeding with humans. This is uncontroversial, so I will not go into much depth about it. However, the Han Chinese sometimes refer to themselves as "Descendents of the Dragon", and in the west we have examples such as Melusine. It is worth noting that Melusine is usually depicted as a woman who is a serpent from the waist down, and that this correspondence opens up a variety of other possible interpretations of draconic lineage, including in an origin myth of the Scythians as documented by Herodotus. This interbreeding, and the consequent extinction of credible documented dragon sightings, likely serve to account for most of the differences between eastern and western dragon depictions, and any remaining real differences can be characterized as demonstrative of different subtypes in the dragon race.
Therefore, we can at once conclude that descendants of both Han Chinese and Scythian ancestry are predominately dragon-blooded, and that among various Celtic, Germanic, and Slavic peoples (who are the principle but not sole cultures to document dragon interbreeding), a minority of dragon-blooded individuals exist. We find a minority of Scythian ancestry in all three places, of course, as well as in modern Iran and elsewhere. In point of fact, the Scythians seem to represent a nexus point, not just geographically in their middle-eastern location, but also in the hybrid-like conception of a dragon which they held, which seems to blend eastern and western dragon characteristics, and in their interactions with cultures which subsequently developed dragon myths of their own. The implications of this are unknown and require more investigation.
In this context, the difference in the significance of the dragon between the east and west becomes immediately apparent. The Christian hatred and vilification of the dragon are revealed as obfuscatory reference to some hidden, hated minority: either hidden by history, or hidden by nature. To understand the properties of this minority and why they might be hated, we should first investigate the Han Chinese under the pretext of overall unity in the total Draconic race, and according to principles of Race Realism:
The most distinct attribute of the Han Chinese is that they are, as a population, smarter than non-draconically derived humans. They score an average of at least 5 points higher on IQ tests than the average population, and that is despite the relative privations inherent to Communist economies. Therefore, high intelligence can be easily understood as an essential racial component of draconic lineage. So why did dragons fail to integrate in the west when they plainly integrated so well, and to such overall advantage, in the east?
The answer can only be Christianity. Christianity is an appallingly stupid institution, as is plainly evinced by its rejection of anything with the character of early Christian philosophy in favor of a purely literary reading of the Bible, upon which all of its increasingly incoherent and vacuous philosophy would subsequently be founded. On repudiating and destroying all early Christian philosophy, Iranaeus of Lyons declared with retardation characteristic of the religion:
"The Gospels could not possibly be either more or less in number than they are. Since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is spread over all the earth, and the pillar and foundation of the Church is the gospel, and the Spirit of life, it fittingly has four pillars, everywhere breathing out incorruption and revivifying men. From this it is clear that the Word, the artificer of all things, being manifested to men gave us the gospel, fourfold in form but held together by one Spirit. As David said, when asking for his coming, "O sitter upon the cherubim, show yourself." For the cherubim have four faces, and their faces are images of the activity of the Son of God. For the first living creature, it says, was like a lion, signifying his active and princely and royal character; the second was like an ox, showing his sacrificial and priestly order; the third had the face of a man, indicating very clearly his coming in human guise; and the fourth was like a flying eagle, making plain the giving of the Spirit who broods over the Church. Now the Gospels, in which Christ is enthroned, are like these."
This is not just stupid, but belligerently stupid: it makes a deliberate point of answering intelligence with stupidity. It does so to demonstrate the authority of the church as so absolute that intelligence is not required, if not absolute precisely because stupidity is its ultimate foundation. Therefore, it is trivial to conclude that dragons were persecuted in Christian societies because of their intelligence. Now, it is necessary to call back to some of my previously developed ideas about intelligence in order to further explain everything that follows from this. To begin with, there are tiers of people. The ancient Gnostics knew this, but were unable to make good use of the knowledge: by reifying it into metaphysical truth, which at the time was the only possible analytical framework, they made it a weapon that functioned against their own communities both in the form of internal strife, and in the form of external criticism. Modern IQ studies, including those that point to difficulties in communication and social interaction between individuals of a standard deviation or more distance between them, help us to better understand some of the factual and material circumstances that must have once engendered thoughts of metaphysical categories.
Combine this with my observation about Meme Zaibatsus and you have the beginning of the whole picture: The Christian Church has been, for its duration, a laboratory for developing the most effective possible means of social cohesion and control, and by requirement its social cohesion and control would have to both take account of differences in intelligence, and take command of the Meme Zaibatsu mechanism of communication. All subsequent Christian "philosophy" not rejected as heresy is thus an instantiation through this type of mechanism.
An essential component of race realism is the notion of extreme correspondence between essential biological properties and behaviors. Thus, dragon is as dragon does. Therefore, I claim as dragons all occultists, all heretics, all alchemists and witches, and all early scientists rejected or harmed by the church, at minimum. Since Christianity is stupid, any visible rejection or deviation from Christianity is generally a sign of intelligence. Furthermore, as a laboratory of social cohesion, Christianity was inherently dishonest and cynical at the level of its intelligent members, whose "philosophy" all reads like gibberish sophistry to any honest and intelligent person of today; just as, in fact, it did to honest and intelligent persons at the time, albeit for different reasons. So there is not just a difference in intelligence but also a difference in character on display here, and if we take race realism for granted, then that must also map to draconic vs human racial characteristics. The truest martyrs aren't just crucified in the flesh but in the image and the name as well, and thus all true western martyrs, even Christian martyrs, share the church as their enemy.
Therefore we arrive very simply at our conclusion, that all intelligent, quality people of character in history were dragons.
Thus ends another Dragonsphere Report